Talk:Spanish Sahara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spanish Sahara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Legal problem[edit]

The page states that the spanish sarah is now part of the sarawi arab republic... though it isn’t. The part should be: Now part of: Morocco Waffleduffle (talk) 11:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Waffleduffle, Morocco occupies ~75%, the SADR controls the rest. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 22:47, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moroccan existence in sahara[edit]

The article mention that On bases of the treaty between Morocco and Spain of 1 March 1767 , Morocco had no claim on region in 1767, This treaty, according to Article 18 of which Sherifian sovereignty extended beyond the Wad Noun, further south into the neighbouring region of Sakiet El Hamra [1]

Morocco has resisted allowing a referendum to be held, and has continued to offer its people jobs in controlled territory.

Morocco didn't resisted referendum , issue is who can and cannot vote , While for the Polisario see the Saharawis that should be allowed to vote in the referendum are only those included in the 1974 Spanish census, for Morocco all Saharawis with family or blood ties to the region should be allowed to vote, irrespective of whether they were included in the Spanish census , This position was shared by 1991 then-UN Secretary-General, Javier Perez de Cuellar. For Perez de Cuellar, the Spanish census of 1974 could not be the only basis for a referendum,. He argued that the Sahrawis’ nomadic way of life, with constant movement of individuals and families across national borders, whether to flee colonialism and conflict, for economic reasons or to seek education, the Spanish census could not include all Saharawis. Even the Spaniards admitted that their census did not reach all of the Saharan territory, and many tribal chiefs have said that thousands of Saharawis and Saharan refugees were omitted from the census

And Morocco keep "offering" people job as part of administration of territory , same with other region in morocco , it's not settlement scheme — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABIDALAA (talkcontribs)

@ABIDALAA: It 100% is a settlement scheme and is on occupied territory, which is in direct violation of international law. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 00:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Emailuser/Koavf and M: even if you want believe they are , they aren't , Morocco run territory same as any other part of Morocco including job offering , the fact is that they are more jobs offering in any other region then in western sahara is prove of my point [2] , also as if it's occupation or not , the Fourth Hague Convention of 18 August 1907 (H.IV) , clearly doesn't fit in western sahara , and nature of dispute is dispute on sovereignty , word occupation was never used on UNSC rapport on western sahara since 1991

References

  1. ^ Fouad Ammoun, Separate Opinion of Vice-President Ammoun , p. 79.
  2. ^ http://alwadifa-maroc.com/offre/public

Considering the editing of the 00:52, 1 June 2020‎[edit]

this editing reinstate that Hispano-Moroccan Treaty of 1767 Morocco had no claim either to western sahara , the actual the treaty between Morocco and Spain of 1 March 1767 , mention in Article 18 sovereignty of sultan extended beyond the Wad Noun, further south into the neighbouring region of Sakiet El Hamra — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABIDALAA (talkcontribs) 02:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Area[edit]

What is the territory of the Spanish Sahara? Bar (talk) 04:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

בר, https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=area+of+Western+Sahara 102,703 mi2. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 06:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Koavf. I asked about the Spanish Sahara, and you found about the area of the Western Sahara. Does the area overlap by 100%? Bar (talk) 06:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
בר, Yes. This is pretty clear from the article, is it not? ―Justin (koavf)TCM 06:19, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]