A fact from St. James Priory, Derby appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 May 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Corporation of Derby used to pay two pounds of wax, annually, to the monks of St. James Priory, for the right to cross St. James Bridge?
St. James Priory, Derby is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
The article on St. James Priory, Derby is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles
"St James' Priory, Derby" and "Full name= St James's Priory, Derby"
are correct whereas the present name of the article is a modern usage; the forms "Priory of St. James, Derby" and "St James's Priory, Derby" are alternatives which conform to English grammar. "Coat of arms" is preferable to "coat of the arms". "Established= Between 1072-1076": either: "between 1072 and 1076" or "c. 1072-76" are preferable. --Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
