Jump to content

Talk:Street children in the Philippines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

originality of the text, and NPOV issues

[edit]

I have checked out some of the sources and so far they are looking like material is cut and pasted from them... and there are some NPOV issues, I will begin to rewrite for the NPOV, and help would be apprecited. Hohohahaha (talk) 17:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with Ref. no. 7

[edit]

It is given as refernce to many fact statements in the text, but the link doesn't lead anywhere. Other references will have to be added. Thanks Maysara (talk) 20:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs rewrite

[edit]

Statistics from the late 1990s and many undated statements. Several dead links. I've just deleted one section that was a copyvio (found using the Wayback machine on one of the dead links). I suspect that several others are too: the "problems" section reads like newspaper clippings and the "NGOs" section reads like brochure/advert clippings. This needs shredding and new, up-to-date research. --Stfg (talk) 19:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Street children in the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Donek6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Section filled with seemingly non-notable organizations

[edit]

The NGO responses section is currently a list of what appears to be mostly non-notable organizations. A number of them are cited with first-party sources. Wikipedia is not a business directory and we should only be mentioning notable organizations that are active in the region (We can't possibly list every business in the world). —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]