|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stunnel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|WikiProject Computing / Software||(Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)|
|WikiProject Free Software / Software / Computing||(Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)|
Do encyclopedia entries for software projects make sense? matt 17:25 Feb 24, 2003 (UTC)
If they are important software projects, yes. The Anome 17:30 Feb 24, 2003 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's what I think. Linux yes. Stunnel no. matt 03:59 Feb 25, 2003 (UTC)
- Why not? It is not like we are concerned with limited space and have to pick and choose between the two. We can have both. Each software project should be given the attention it deserves. If stunnel is not important, not a lot needs to be said about it. Does the article add to human knowledge? yes. Does it somehow minimize articles on other software projects? no.
Unix --> Unix-like?
Is it more correct to say "most Unix-like operating systems" rather than "most Unix operating systems"? After reviewing the page on unix-like operating systems, I decided it was, and made the change... lenehey
From the given example:
- "Network traffic from clients connecting to the mail server on port 465 would initially pass over SSL to the Stunnel application, which would then transparently forward unsecured traffic to port 25 of the mail server."