Talk:Survey marker

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Maps Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Survey marker is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Major edit

Pgrig (talk) 15:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC) A major edit was carried out. Broadened description of types of marks and added ref. to Leigh paper. Related triangulation surveys to map-making. Distinguished between tri station and reference marks. Described NGS database and PIDs, with sample datasheet and ways to recall these. Mentioned benchmark hunting. Some extra footnotes to support these points will be added shortly. I am a hobbyist (benchmark hunter), not a surveyor.[reply]

Pgrig (talk) 12:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Continued editing. Added photos of tri station and reference marks. Added cite for underground marks. Adjusted vs. scaled marks. Tripoints (which were mentioned in original footnotes). And added "U.S." a lot, since survey marks and procedures differ internationally. (Would be nice to have input on other nations' systems.)[reply]

Merge Boundary marker

The content and subject of Boundary marker seems similar enough to me to that there should only be a single article. So I make the proposal to merge them. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:09, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The two types of marker serve very different purposes, for example one is about the process of surveying and the other is about the outcome. If they were merged, we'd need to include Triangulation station as well and potentially many others.--Northernhenge (talk) 22:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps Keep the "Boundary Marker" Article Separate...

Pgrig (talk) 16:49, 14 August 2010 (UTC) If the boundary markers shown in that article are between countries, I suggest keeping their article as is, since it is their reference to country boundaries that distinguishes them. (I'm not sure what the Welsh marker shown there is all about.) We could of course generate many, many examples of different sorts of international or state/provincial boundary markers, property markers, subdivision markers, etc. However, one assumes that a valid boundary marker was at some time surveyed, so if someone want to integrate the boundary market bits into "Survey Marker", they should give it a shot.[reply]

Information - The Welsh stone shown marks the boundary of Caernarfonshire County Council and is a county boundary marker. It also bears a benchmark (small arrow at the top) so it is also a survey marker, in this case for the Ordnance Survey Velella ^{Velella Talk} 15:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For the record I oppose the merge for much the same reasons as outline above by Pgrig. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 15:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contrast to Benchmark (surveying)

Could anybody contrast survey markers to Benchmark (surveying)? I do not understand the difference. Yotwen (talk) 10:31, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly speaking a surveying benchmark is always used to mark elevation. A survey marker includes benchmarks, but also includes horizontal position marks. Jc3s5h (talk) 16:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is it too U.S. oriented?

Obviously, surveying markers exist in most, if not all countries around the world, but the article focuses on U.S. This should be edited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.145.145.155 (talk) 11:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Survey marker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100704150507/http://www.ngs.noaa.gov:80/PC_PROD/PARTNERS/index.shtml to http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PC_PROD/PARTNERS/index.shtml/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Survey marker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224113041/http://www.penryfamily.com/surveying/saintderoin.html to http://www.penryfamily.com/surveying/saintderoin.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]