Talk:Swainsona pyrophila

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / South Australia / Victoria / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Swainsona pyrophila is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Victoria, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Fixes

@Gderrin: Please double check this article. You had several indicators of another species, so I'm not sure you only have S. pyrophila info here. Looks like you may have copied from an S. purpurea article or notes to make this article, but didn't correct everything. I fixed the obvious spots (though I started down a garden path, pun intended, before correcting myself) but there may be more to fix. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:17, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@UtherSRG: Double checked. Thanks for your corrections. (I don't think definite articles ("the") should be used before common names.) Gderrin (talk) 11:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]