This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tanisha Williams article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Overall this page is well complete. Some critiques I have are a few spots where the grammar is a bit clunky, some of the citations link to things that aren't very clear in what exactly they are supporting and it would be nice to have a photo. Particular citations would the first citation of source 1, does this page just say she's a botanist? is it necessary to cite that when you have cited so many other sources about her research? the other would be the first citing of source. It isn't clear what information it is providing, perhaps moving it closer to what exactly you're drawing from it could make it more clear. My final critique would beof putting #BlackBotanistsWeek in the Lead. Without the hashtag having its own article to link it seems like there should be more information on the # since putting in the lead makes it seems like it will be more represented than it is in the body of the page. I would also recommend touching more on her activism and what her motivations and goals are since you're sources discuss this but your activism section seems to just rephrase the lead discussion about her found the hashtag. The grammar should be no problem to fix with a read over, there wasn't much but the sentence "For her doctoral research, she studied plant adaptability to climate change, and the ability to predict plant adaptability to climate change, focusing on plants in the Pelargonium genus growing in the Cape Floristic Region in South Africa." is particularly confusing and you should rework it. Godawgs598 (talk) 22:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
