Talk:Taus v. Loftus

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sourcing concerns

I'm concerned about the sources used in this article: although the article superficially appears well sourced there are quite significant problems. Of the seven sources used, four are articles written by Loftus, one of the two parties to the underlying dispute. Another is by Tavris, described as a "longtime friend" of Loftus [1]. Yet another is a primary source. This seems to me to be quite inappropriate for an article which is in essence a BLP. I would be grateful for any thoughts on these points. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 21:50, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a legal article, primary sources are not only acceptable, but are encouraged (along, of course, with secondary sources), see WP:MOSLAW. It needs work though. GregJackP Boomer! 15:33, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Part of the problem is that although this is supposed to be a legal article almost the entire content (before our intervention) was written by a single author, a psychology student, who created it as part of a class assignment. Anyway, the infobox is great. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 17:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also reformated the refs. I'm not sure what style they were in, so I used Bluebook since this is a legal article. I may do some additional work on the article. GregJackP Boomer! 18:59, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. My most serious remaining concerns are with the two final sections, which (1) seem to be full of SYNTH, and (2) present opinions of Loftus as facts. My personal inclination would just be to delete them, but given your obviously greater familarity with legal articles you probably have a much better idea than I do what is acceptable here. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 21:21, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, I agree with you, the last two sections are OR, so I deleted them. I've found some good sources, and will rework the article. I'll probably gut and rebuild quite a bit. Bear with me - it may take a bit. GregJackP Boomer! 23:23, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's looking so much better. Many thanks for taking this on: I knew it was bad but very little idea of how to fix it. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 08:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Victoria University of Wellington supported by WikiProject Psychology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]