This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is part of the Buckethead task force, a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Buckethead. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
I would like to see this article elaborated on, as I'm new to the concept... Maybe some of Bey's detractors? Critiques? I've come across this author and his concepts through various channels, so it much have caught on at least decently and any idea that catches on has detractors and critics, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twobitsprite (talk • contribs) (23:51, 26 July 2005)
The article at present is actually about one section of the book T.A.Z.; should it be expanded to include the whole book? Шизомби 03:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
I think there is far too much information (irrelevant information, that is) about Burning Man in this article. A brief mention of Burning Man as an example of a T.A.Z. is fine, but we do not need all this extra detail about "BMorg" and its supposed treatment of its employees. Thoughts? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 15:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I think it's fine. It's being presented many other places as well as this article as being somewhat of a TAZ, but that may not be a good example - those extra details you are complaining about are the counterpoint. And it's not like the article is huge and bloated anyway. --Gwern(contribs) 05:03 9 February2008 (GMT)
Maybe someone can dig up a pertinent quote from Larry Harvey. Aftern the 2011 burn, that is. Kortoso (talk) 18:19, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Judging by the title, one might believe this article is about the concept of the T.A.Z., rather than about the book. If this is about the book, I would suggest a page move to a title more in keeping with the title of the book. If, though, this is about the concept, which is probably a better idea, I would suggest merging the unreferenced Permanent Autonomous Zone article with this one. The latter article is largely repetitive of this one. Any thoughts? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 17:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
will not a concespt make it get lost in wawe of postmodernist care for itself ideas and not what taz actuley are abut ? donedell —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 14:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
WHY why not put a link to somwher that have some posting discussen abut the conspet or wher his ideas are take from foculte since its a many ideas sugstions and ppl want to share ideas i guss taz is what you can do yourself by choose to buy a lonly planet or set up a tent i a beach in el salvadore? paz maybe are foks join togehter like marjuina gorwher in canda seteup a sub system for live and exhange things , paz are more abut go somwher build somthing taz can you just read focult taz drink a redbuill and write dowen your ideas then make a plan for what to do ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 17:50, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Could you please repeat that in English? --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 18:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus - It's been more than 12 months with no real consensus either way. Feel free to suggest it again if you feel strongly about it. Stalwart111 06:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Really, the Pirate Utopia concept does not seem to exist apart from the concept of TAZ. That is, the term was coined by Mr. Wilson and defined by him. I am not claiming they did not exist, or that they weren't real utopias. Rather Mr. Wilson is the only author who claims they might exist, and it seems that he uses the term to describe a hypothetical/theoretical model. Anyway, the other article is quite limited, and could easily be a part of this one. Tinynanorobots (talk) 20:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Weak oppose. While the term "pirate utopia" may have been coined by Hakim Bey, people both before and besides him have imagined utopian pirate societies. However, the article at this point does not convey that, and more problematically it could be difficult to convey that without getting into original research territory. Can we give this a few months? If there aren't some good, secondary-sourced, non-OR, Bey-independent expansions by around July then I would support a merge. Bacchiad (talk) 00:47, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.