Jump to content

Talk:The Automatic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Band Members

[edit]

Ok, there isnt much on the actual band members, soo i was thinking of just creating one single artical for all 4 members of the band, instead of the 4 pages (one for each member, except iwan as his page was deleted.)

anyone agree this would be a good idea???

This information could easily be put into the main article - I'm going to merge tag it and if no one objects merge it in. These guys are not notable enough (yet) as individuals to warrant their own articles, their notability lies in being members of the band. Madmedea 15:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support As it stands the article just repeats what has been said in the main article on the band. Any additional biographical information can be put into the history of the band. Oggy 10:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Against I'm working on adding in new sources, including equipment, notable performances and personal life. Seeming as i have already removed the page for each member of the band, this article should be kept and expanded upon, and seeming as i m one of the only people that actually works a lot on making this article i think we should keep it as a separate page. Instead of adding more merge tags in perhaps help to gather up interviews and sources we can use to expand the article? Thanks

perhaps the artical could just be expanded upon? the original articals for each member have already been removed, so one page for all band members isnt alot.

  • Alex Pennie is leaving the band after the gigs on weekend of August bank holiday because everybody had enough of his one dimensional idea of him yapping like a scottish terrier through every song —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.106.167.105 (talk) 00:39, August 25, 2007 (UTC)
Shame, I have fears that they'll become just another also-ran similar-sounding grungy guitar outfit without the synth parts and his demented squealing to add that little bit of colour and uniqueness. Even if you can't tell what's being 'sung'. 82.46.180.56 (talk) 03:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To Do List....

[edit]

Date

[edit]

I went to school with the Automatic. They have been gigging for years, way before 2004. can somebody change this to about 2002? I don't know how.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.111.238.108 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks. Oggy 14:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

[edit]

Hi, I put a picture in but it won't work because I don't know how to insert pictures from websites. If someone clever would like to fix it up for me it'd be great, thanks in advance.

Ta x Jade —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.70.37.85 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Influences

[edit]

I've removed the bit that says they're influenced by "everyone" because that's ridiculous. I've included Jarcrew in their brief influence list because apart from the fact that they've taken Jarcrew to town so badly that they should probably write them a cheque, the Jarcrew "connection" has been acknowledged several times by the band, including as a comment on a Jarcrew FanSpace. John..

It's not ridiculous at all. Any band will be influenced by every single artist they encounter. It doesn't have to be positive influence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.241.186 (talk) 16:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The 'GMTV Incident'

[edit]

I removed everything that was written about what happened on GMTV for a couple of reasons:

  • It was mentioned twice! If it's going to be mentioned at all it should only be a short reference.
  • One mention of it wasn't very neutral - "in a failed attempt to increase their credibility".
  • The other mention probably needed some severe rewriting.

If anyone wants to add it back in then can I ask that you just note my comments. I'll have some time to improve other bits of the article in the coming few days. Thanks. Oggy 14:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Singles

[edit]

ok the automatic have 5 singles, would it be better to keep just the current 3 on the main page? and then have the full 5 singles on the Not Accepted Anywhere page, as well i thought it may look quite good if there were pictures for each band member with there name, if that even makes sense. oh and some of the pictures i have recently uploaded for use on the automatics page may disapear some time soon, i keep forgeting the license stuff, just to let anyone who edits this page know!

Post Hardcore

[edit]

no one will believe this i know, but i have heard one of their songs that i believe to be hardcore - "Epic" - i got it with an issue of Kerrang!Adil Ghanty 19:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In a word, no. Deanster123 11:51, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Epic is a cover. And it isn't hardcore, it's alternative rock. --↑ɻ⅞θʉɭђɥл₮₴Ṝ 21:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images in The Automatic main article

[edit]

I am going to say this here, to the people who keep reverting all of the image emplacements of The Automatic main page, stop. The images have been released both on theautomatic.co.uk, and publicly By The Automatic on there Forum, they have also been available on MP3.com, Myspace, purevolume [NME], haystack and many more, also 'Raw Books' is NOT the name of the new album. and a reference keep being repaired and then broken by this wikiwar. I am not going to stop reverting, obviously an admin can stop me but this is ridiculous, you are interrupting wiki guidelines in a stupid way and finding new problems with any image uploaded, you are more obsessed with ruining articles than actually improving them. (LemonLemonLemons 14:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Unless they were released under a free license (GFDL, one of the Creative Commons ones or even into the public domain), they are copyrighted and considered fair use. We have policies to limit the number of fair use images. Provided there are free images (there is one), then there is no reason to use non-free images. We are a free encyclopedia, not a free encyclopedia that we can put unlimited copyrighted content into. ^demon[omg plz] 15:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On a similar note, I notice Image:Theautomaticlogo.png is being used here. That is also a non-free image and if it is genuinely a logo, it should be easy to find reliable, third-party sources which discuss it. If not, I believe it should be removed. --John (talk) 19:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Various uses.(LemonLemonLemons (talk) 20:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Considerations of creating new pages

[edit]

At the moment for many of the songs i have found out alot behind the songs and the way they perform it and what the lyrics are about ect, I'm considering creating pages on some of the other songs from Not Accepted Anywhere, to free up this Not Accepted Anywhere#Track listing#Song Meanings and other parts of various articles, obviously i still need more infomation on some of the songs but i fell there is probably enough infomation for articles on By My Side and Thats What She Said, perhaps others as well, anyone have any strong objections to this? (86.159.81.139 (talk) 17:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Read Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Songs first - kollision (talk) 12:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Tour Images

[edit]

Does anyone have any they would mind putting on the page as of yet there are no images featuring the new line-up.(LemonLemonLemons (talk) 16:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Should awards be a list or not?

[edit]

Should the awards section be a list, a table, or just written out as a paragraph? (86.160.198.158 (talk) 19:42, 15 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Band members

[edit]

None of the band members appear to be independently notable; they are referenced only in connection with this band. Therefore, the descriptions of these persons belong in this article, not in four separate articles. If this article becomes too long such that it may be appropriate to split out the section on the band members, then a single subpage on the band members should be made; see Wikipedia:Subpages for more information. —Centrx→talk • 01:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is already getting very long, i see no real reason to get rid of the band members, there lists of equipment and other such parts can't be put in the main article, how about instead of moaning about there articles not being notable you actually help expand them. (LemonLemonLemons (talk) 08:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Bob the Builder

[edit]

I've heard from several music industry sources that the company which owns Bob the Builder approached The Automatic a couple of years ago to request that it be allowed to rework 'Monster' as Bob's 2006 Christmas single: the stories I've heard say that the band turned down the request, as they feared fans would start singing the reworked version ("What's that coming over the hill? It's Bob the Builder, Bob the Builder") at them during gigs. I can't find much evidence of this, aside from Popbitch (archived here ). Does anyone know how much truth there is in the story? Dom Kaos (talk) 16:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Automatic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Automatic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 9 external links on The Automatic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on The Automatic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on The Automatic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on The Automatic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Automatic&oldid=1195539764"