Talk:The Famous Royal Navy Volunteer

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bristol Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article
	This article has a map
	This article has an infobox

Beer: Pubs Low‑importance

	Beer portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Pub task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Merger with King Street, Bristol

I am proposing to merge this article with King Street, Bristol in order to make King Street, Bristol a Good article. Mark999 13:48, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Requested move 31 March 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 19:13, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17 King Street, Bristol → The Famous Royal Naval Volunteer – Use building's name rather than address. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With the history of this and Talk:King Street, Bristol this may not be uncontroversial and probably should be a full RM. As the only reference in this article lists it by it's street address not the tenant, and the article is in fact about the building the tenant is only mentioned as a side note. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of buildings have an address, under the same lodgic The Plough in Ipswich could be at 2 Dogs Head Street, Ipswich. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Not exactly a new pub. It's occupied the building since at least the 19th century and the public face of the building is the historic pub façade. Much better title. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@Crouch, Swale: can you update the article accordingly? I'm worried I might make it worse by doing so myself. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 19:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Arbitrarily0: done. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Name incorrectly spelled in title

it's called The Famous Royal Navy Volunteer, not Naval, the name is written on the pub sign in the photo and that's what it goes by in its media. I'm not entirely sure how to go about amending this, I tried based on instructions but not convinced it worked.

So, it turns out I got it!

EnglishWoodsman (talk) 06:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]