Talk:The Mystery of Edwin Drood (TV series)

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Article title... could/should it be modified?

Hello Necrothesp and Maclean,

I want to thank you for starting-up this article and its "talk page", because I had wanted to do this myself after watching the two episodes on BBC2, but I'm still relatively new and haven't attempted such yet.

May I take you both to task on one point, namely the inclusion of the term "miniseries" in the article title, which is, in my opinion, inaccurate.

I look forward to your replies.

Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 10:15, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is part of a disambiguation: The Mystery of Edwin Drood (disambiguation). What do you think would be a more appropriate disambiguation? maclean (talk) 11:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer, being a "Brit", [[The Mystery of Edwin Drood 2012 (BBC 2-hour dramatisation)]]

Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 11:53, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Titanic (disambiguation) illustrates a similar disambiguation scheme. The disambiguation should be as simple as possible and follow WP naming conventions (Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television) or Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films)). Your suggestion has too many disambiguations, we should aim for one or two words. According to those naming convention guidelines, our options depend on the medium, is it a film or a miniseries? Looking at TV miniseries, it looks like miniseries is correct, though I think a case can be made that it could be called a "film" (just one made of TV). I think our options are (TV miniseries) or (2012 film), though I can see (miniseries) and (TV serial) is also used in other articles. maclean (talk) 21:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. For my part, I would prefer 2012 film, as I find miniseries misleading in this instance. After all, it would seem that it is to be aired in the US all on one night. Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 22:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm British as well, and as the creator of this article and its title I think miniseries is the correct description, certainly under Wikipedia conventions. It's certainly not a film in its country of origin, as films are invariably a single part, not two parts. -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But only two parts, and may be shown as one, as it will be in the US. Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 22:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

However, Wikipedia practice is to describe films and TV series in the form in which they were originally shown in their country of origin, which was as a two-part series, which is commonly referred to (now also in Britain too) as a miniseries. -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, as I said at the top of the section, I am a new boy and I bow to your considerable experience on Wikipedia. I look forward to reading the article as it develops. Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 22:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]