Talk:Thomas Horrocks Openshaw

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thomas Horrocks Openshaw article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Crime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I

I have had another attempt at the article, removing any content that may be accused of being a copyvio, and adding fuller sources. Jack1956 (talk) 21:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At a glance this appears to still have the same copyright concerns. You can't just take text from other sources and reuse them, you have to write from scratch in your own words.

Be aware also that Google page caches are not the sort of things you can cite reliably in articles. 68.47.175.159 (talk) 01:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of all that. I have reworked the article..please take a longer look. Jack1956 (talk) 11:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been completely rewritten, as examining it properly will show. The anonymous user (also known as Dreamguy) has nominated this for deletion as he is unhappy that I have discovered his on-going use of sockpuppets to circumvent Wiki policy. See here [1] and here [2] Jack1956 (talk) 17:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These false accusations of sockpuppeting, assumptions of bad faith) simply do not change the fact that the contents of the article copied and pasted text straight from another website, as detailed on the main article. All this temp page is doing is extending the problems to multiple spaces on wikipedia. 68.47.175.159 (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At no stage were either of the Openshaw articles 'copied and pasted'. Both articles are based mainly on his obituary, rewritten and extended using other sources by me, including, in a minor capacity, the Barts article. This new article is entirely in my own words. I am sorry that you feel my accusation of sockpuppetry is false. I assure you that I am 100% sincere about it and that it does not arise out of maliciousness in any way. None of us are here for personal glory or enhanced reputation. We all surely want the best for Wiki and to extend knowledge. I cannot just stand by and see that damaged. If the Openshaw article is not up to standard then it will go. That will be sad but it won't be the end of my world. Jack1956 (talk) 21:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:DreamGuy's pretty much right here. I just had the two (this and version of main before blanking) open in separate tabs and switched back and forth. All the changes are superficial, such as rewording noncontent phrases and removing small amounts of content. It easily makes WP:CSD#G12. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 00:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have had one last overhaul of the article. I don't know what else to do other than what I've done now. Jack1956 (talk) 07:04, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does this mean I can use extracts from the Barts article?

Brief extracts of any material may be reproduced without our permission, under the “fair dealing” provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988; for the purposes of research for non-commercial purposes; private study; criticism; review and news reporting - all subject to an acknowledgement of ourselves as the copyright owner. Wider re-use requires our permission. This applies equally to the any of the Trust’s logos.

[3] Jack1956 (talk) 11:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's kinda' moot now, since the speedy was declined. Keep working on it, I guess. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 15:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New article

Please note: this new article is not the same one that was nominated for deletion as a copyvio and deleted at my request on January 12 2008. Jack1956 (talk) 17:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "Interests" and "Last Years" section of the biography are still almost the same as the London and Barts archive article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Revmagpie (talk • contribs) 09:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The 'Interests' section is a list of societies of which Openshaw was a member. How do you rewrite the name of a society? Jack1956 (talk) 08:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Horrocks Openshaw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527080506/http://daveg4otu.tripod.com/airfields/ben.html to http://daveg4otu.tripod.com/airfields/ben.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]