Talk:Thomas Porteous

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Louisiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).

United States courts and judges

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Yeah, I took the other article and incorporated it into this one. Ericl (talk) 16:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ref audit and recent edits

Hello all,

Today I've completed a reference audit for this article since this guy could end up impeached. In the process, I've removed these statements from 'Federal Judge' section:

Porteous is well-known for his stance upholding the Constitutional separation of church and state and his judgments in defense of the First Amendment right to free speech.

and

He said there was ample evidence that many of the groups participating in the Governor's Program on Abstinence were "furthering religious objectives."

For the first one, it seems POV. If one were a conservative type of fellow, one could make an opposite statement. As for the second one, I could find no refs for it. If anyone here finds any, re-add it. Hope this helps. - Thanks, Hoshie 01:31, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From memory, there were references to these. But it was a long time ago..! I'll have a look and see if I can find them – Agendum (talk) 22:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-added the second line with a ref. I haven't been able to find a ref for the first one. I still have more to add when it comes to the hearings. I've already added everything from the impeachment vote to until now. - Thanks, Hoshie 11:48, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Thomas Porteous. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Main photo

The Present photo is pixelated and out of focus, there are better photos of the man available, could we use those instead? 50.82.56.112 (talk) 05:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]