This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
I have reverted this article to a much earlier version. Someone had copy-pasted a large amount of text from the company website, something that is a violation of copyright law and Wikipedia policy. Please write stuff in your own words, or use materials with explicit permission. --Alvestrand (talk) 10:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care of the copyvio. The article still reads very promotional and there may even be some COI. I've contacted some of the other contributors to see if this can be fixed.--Kudpung (talk) 22:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
The article has been tagged again for needing references. Please do NOT remove the tag again until the issue has been resolved. Please ensure that to avoid COI, references are to reliable third party sources that do not commercially promote the subject's possible commercial interests.--Kudpung (talk) 23:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
A perfectly legitimate reason, and now that the article is there, and as other articles already link to it in correct context, it's probably a good idea to see if it can be developed. Hence the reason why I have removed the PROD template which was inserted within 3 hours of my message to all the contributors. Let's give it a chance before getting too dramatic and deletion trigger-happy.--Kudpung (talk) 04:19, 13 October 2009 (UTC)