Talk:Tony Defries

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 August 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notability/NPOV

Well, that´s too funny - this is not an objective article at all, but sounds rather like a PR-campaign for DeFries himself. Look at the history of this entry and you will find

"DeFries clearly wrote this entry himself[...]"

I doubt that wikipedia is the right place for articles like this. At least not if you´re looking for information.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.48.21.4 (talk • contribs) 14 August 2008‎

Subject seems to be notable, having managed Bowie, Mott the Hoople and Iggy Pop. I'm rewriting in neutral terms. Itsmejudith (talk) 17:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There should definitely be an article about MainMan, however you assess them - creative chaos or looney bin - it was a highly influential company for a few years. I recognize it's really hard in this case to come up with anything that would seem fully objective and certified by WP standards. /Strausszek (talk) 00:34, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In support of the claim that this article is not objective,according to recent biographies,this is the view of David Bowie:

"One reason for his restlessness, extreme even by his standards, had come in New York at the end of July, when he learned the real nature of his financial relationship with Defries. As Trynka writes, Bowie ‘believed he was a partner in MainMan’, the management company Defries had built around him. ‘In reality, he was an employee.’ He wanted out, but couldn’t extricate himself entirely: MainMan owned the masters of all the recordings he’d made to date, and Defries was entitled to hefty royalties, in perpetuity, on everything Bowie made until their contract expired in 1982. So he wasn’t free of Defries, but perversely the ongoing constraints of his contractual obligations to his ex-manager – at the crudest level, his wish not to make money for MainMan – gave him a new sense of artistic freedom, the recklessness that comes of believing you have nothing to lose."

from LRB (London Review of Books) So Ordinary so Glamorous - March 2012 I'm not an experienced editor, maybe someone can add this viewpoint to the published page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.76.46.25 (talk) 06:26, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

This article can't even get the name right. And I can't be arsed to create a page called "Tony DeFries", and redirect "Tony Defries" to "Tony DeFries". So feel free to do that in my stead, someone ... anyone. Cheers (an ardent Bowie fan). Ref ^(chew)(do) 05:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

The article remains a pretty airbrushed account of DeFries and his life. His notability largely comes from his huge bustup with Bowie, and this is barely mentioned. I know this is a BLP and we need to take care, but this should be covered if we are going to retain a DeFries article at all. --Ef80 (talk) 17:46, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article was rewritten by @Djmehow: and is now a hagiography full of WP:PEACOCKery and no mention of anything negative. Spike 'em (talk) 18:26, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling of name

There seems to be some confusion over whether or not to capitalize the F in "defries." The BBC does. The New York Times does currently. But back in 1986, they didn't. [1] The closest thing I can find to an official website is this LinkedIn profile [2]. Based on that, it seems like he prefers it uncapitalized. So, I will move the article to "Tony Defries." If someone has a more definitive source for the spelling—liner notes, legal documents, company website—please feel free to change it back. --GentlemanGhost (converse) 01:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

info box

in the info box, the subject is described as: "technologist material science quantum physics researcher"

there is no evidence in the article to suggest that he has ever studied anything by way of a technical/scientific disciplne, only that he has funded or directed some research. can we fix this, one way or t'other, please?

duncanrmi (talk) 21:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biased puff piece

This article reads like it was written by the guy himself, it heavily airbrushes the MainMan years and his conflicts with Bowie which led to a rancorous split between them in 1975 and Bowie taking charge of his own career. Bowie felt that Defries was practically embezzling the income he generated for MainMan (and that the manager was trying to pose as the real artist), under the cover of a contract Bowie had signed without really understanding the fine print, simply on the strength of his personal bond with Defries around 1970/71. George Tremlett's biography Bowie: Living on the Brink (one of the best biographies of this elusive artist) and Tony Zanetta's Stardust (a key source for the MainMan years; Zanetta was one of very few people who had access to both men at the time) give a completely different view of the economic and artistic circumstances around the split. 188.150.64.57 (talk) 08:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]