Talk:Treasure Hunt (British game show)

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Bogus[edit]

I'm surprised the article doesn't mention that this show was completely and utterly bogus. The landings were all planned in advance - there is no way that the helicopter would have been allowed to fly and land wherever it pleased without the relevant permissions from airspace authorities and landowners. --Richardrj 05:47, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's nothing. I have reason to believe the clues were planted in certain locations as well! ;-) --Bonalaw 07:54, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You've emboldened me to add my point (but not yours; you can do that if you wish) to the article. --Richardrj 09:49, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This really isn't true you know - helicopters (and other small aircraft flying visually) have great freedom to fly more or less where they like at low altitude over most of the UK. Even in those areas which are controlled airspace, permission is routinely granted over the radio with minimal hassle.

Similarly helicopters can land and take off pretty much anywhere with the permission of the landowner, as long as it's safe and otherwise complies with the rules of the air. (If a site is used for less than 28 days in a year for landings/takeoffs it doesn't even need planning permission).

See http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?categoryid=7&pagetype=90&pageid=769 for a brief intro from the CAA on this.

Although scheduled airliners etc are very strictly controlled and monitored for their entire journey, a huge number of so-called general aviation flights operate under far more relaxed rules, particularly in visual flight conditions where the pilot is trusted and able to see hazards and react to them without relying on air traffic control.

205.228.12.194 13:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whats going on[edit]

i added a section about a classic moment where the presenter had tinitus and got distracted during the show. it was on points of view the next evening, someone had written in saying " i tuned in to watch anneka rice, not some old geezer's personal problems". the moment was mocked on comedey shows around the country.

why was this deleted?

You'd have to find a good source, e.g. from the archives of a major national newspaper, or something like the IMDB. And even then it would have to be notable; if Wikipedia did not have a notability standard, it would be easy for people suffing with logorrhoea to fatten up the article with lots of things that are true and accurate but non-noteworthy (e.g. the exact running times of each episode, exact airdates, the different colours of Anneka Rice's jumpsuits). Even if this event could be sourced, it might not necessarily be worth mentioning. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 23:02, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Treasure Hunt (UK) theme excerpt.ogg[edit]

Image:Treasure Hunt (UK) theme excerpt.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]