Talk:Treaty on Basic Relations Between Japan and the Republic of Korea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What??[edit]

This section makes no sense at all. Looks like it was translated by a computer:

Two is made from English, Japanese, and Korean (Korean language), and the agreement is being kept respectively by the two countries. It is known that there was US's initiation behind this negotiation since about July, 1951, and South Korea cannot become the country concerned of Peace Treaty signed in San Francisco, the president Syngman Rhee at that time hopes for direct talks with Japan, and there is details from which the conference (Preparatory talks : on October 20, 1951) is begun in diplomatic director of a bureau's Siebold attendance in highest command (SCAP) in Tokyo in Allied Forces.

Didn't want to remove it because it might be important...if one could understand it. PhnxFyreG (talk) 05:00, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many sources missing[edit]

Almost all sources for the final section on compensation are missing. This should be fixed as soon as possible, as the claims made are quite important, and relatively difficult to verify online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niyab (talkcontribs) 13:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of compensation between Japan and Germany[edit]

4.23.83.100 added a comparison of compensation between Japan and Germany. However the source only says the amount of money Germany paid. There is no mention of a comparison of compensation between Japan and Germany in the source. Nazi massacred 10 million people while Japan increased the population of Korea by 13 million. The situations were completely different. The fact that the compensation of Nazi was huge simply means Nazi did the wrongdoing far more than Japan. It is ridiculous to compare the compensation without considering what the compensation was paid for. Such comparison is clearly original research. Unless there is a reliable source which compares the compensation of two countries, the original research should not be added.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 05:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I've seen this on a couple of pages(財産及び請求権に関する問題の解決並びに経済協力に関する日本国と大韓民国との間の協定). However, this agreement is covered in this article. In fact, it takes up most of the article space. Is there a reason to have separate articles. For now, I'll just set up a redirect. XinJeisan (talk) 09:25, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]