Talk:Up All Night (30 Rock)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleUp All Night (30 Rock) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starUp All Night (30 Rock) is part of the 30 Rock (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 17, 2008Good article nomineeListed
May 8, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Television (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Comedy (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Up All Night (30 Rock)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article's looking alright, but here are a few suggestions for improvement:

  • It was written by, the series' creator and executive producer, Tina Fey and it was directed by Michael Engler - comma confusion. Get rid of the one after "written by" and add one after "Tina Fey". Done
  • Why is February 08 used, not just February 8? I've never seen this done before - I went to WP:MOS#Dates and it didn't say anything about this but uses examples like "March 5" and "7 January" without the zeroes. Done
  • Guest stars in this episode included... - the episode still exists, therefore it still "includes" many guest stars. Done
  • It's Valentine's Day and the TGS cast and crew have to pull an all-nighter - use "it is" to avoid contractions, and although "pull an all-nighter" is probably the best descriptive term to use, it probably isn't the most uncyclopedic or formal. Could we reword? Done
  • Cerie reveals that she in fact does not have feelings for Kenneth - we've just used the phrase "to have feelings for" so maybe mix it up and use something else like "she is not attracted to Kenneth". Done
  • Soho Grand Hotel - "SoHo"? That'd be the correct NY spelling, but I don't know if there's a sign or something that actually appears in the show...? Not done
    • A sign doesn't appear in the episode, but during the end credits, the hotel's credit (for product placement) is spelt Soho.
  • Liz has received a gift, of chocolates and flowers, from a supposed secret admirer - either remove the commas or the work "of". Done
  • Pete has forgotten that it's Valentine's Day and that also happens to mean that is his wife, Paula's, birthday - how about "...it is Valentine's Day, which also happens to be his wife Paula's birthday"? A few changes in there. Done
  • He spends the night running around to city - "the city"? Done typo
  • she would appear in various episodes in a different role - "in different roles"? Done
  • 6% of all 18–49 year olds watching television at the time of the broadcast in the U.S. - it looks weird, but there need to be another full-stop/period at the end of the sentence after "U.S.". Done
  • Canning rated this episode "8.5 out of 10" - no need for the quotes, it's a rating that can be taken out of context. Done

Otherwise, everything looks okay. The article will be on hold for a week so good luck making changes in that time. I've also noticed you have quite a few GANs going at the moment, so it'd be much appreciated if you filled out a review or two of some other articles :) —97198 talk 07:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Great, I'm happy to pass the article. —97198 talk 02:06, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Up All Night (30 Rock). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Up All Night (30 Rock). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)