Talk:Upper Rhenish Master

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge with Paradiesgärtlein

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Closed: No support for a merger. Moonraker12 (talk) 15:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is an article about the only known work of this artist at Paradiesgärtlein. It is not referenced and of almost the same length as this one. Seeing as the master is only known by moniker, and this work is the sole reason (and please correct me if I'm wrong) for his fame, I'm not really sure he warrants an article of his own. Axel Löfving (talk) 22:29, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you much for contribution. I am expanding this article. The work is very important and the actual shared knowledge about the artist is really worth being improved. Tha artist deserves the right to be identified on his own - also if only as a unnamed Master - not the only indeed in the period between 13th-century - 15th-century. This particularly for improving research on him and his period of activity.--Veronichinus (talk) 10:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've closed this, as there has been no support for this proposal in the past three years. I would also note that there is little overlap between the articles, and both artist and painting are notable. I would also note that the German WP article is considerably more detailed, and (to correct the proposer) lists four other paintings by this artist which are themselves notable. So there is plenty of room for improvement. Moonraker12 (talk) 15:55, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.