Jump to content

Talk:Violence against Indians in Australia controversy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Violence against Indians in Australia controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Violence against Indians in Australia controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 - (Deletion of this section)

[edit]

Detailed reasons why this section has been deleted; 1) I’ve followed the ongoing reports of the terrible crime this section refers to, and I’ve checked the most recent reports on the consequent court case. This court case has made clear that the murder was a random attack and was not driven by racism. 2) Evidence tendered to the court showed that the cause of the attack was extreme psychiatric illness, including schizophrenia and psychosis, & the attacker was found unfit to stand trial for this reason. Since the core theme of the article is racially motivated violence (a fact that should be reflected in the title, but is not), this makes the mention of this crime superfluous to this article. 3) In addition, the current text is about 2 years out of date and does not reflect the court’s findings. For these reasons, the section does not deserve to be in this article and should be deleted. I hope you accept my good faith in making this edit. Cheers! 203.39.222.146 (talk) 12:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Visits by publicity hounds

[edit]

Why are visits by various publicity seekers more important than the chronology and details of the attacks? I think the previous structure was much more logical. Greglocock (talk) 21:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]