Talk:Vulnicura Strings
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vulnicura Strings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Title change
[edit]The title of this article should be changed to 'Vulnicura Strings (The Acoustic Versions - Strings, Voice And Viola Organista Only) as mentioned on the respective album sticker (see Discogs).
The current title was only used for promo editions of the album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.194.107.69 (talk) 09:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- I wonder if the article should be moved to simply Vulnicura Strings (common name). ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Also, I believe the title includes the word "Version", not "Versions", as seen in the lead and infobox. These should be corrected, right? ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:31, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 29 July 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 06:18, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Vulnicura Strings (Vulnicura: The Acoustic Version – Strings, Voice and Viola Organista Only) → Vulnicura Strings – Aside from being more concise, it is also undoubtedly the common name. — Kawnhr (talk) 16:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). ASUKITE 17:55, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- The following was copied from WP:RM/TR:
I'm inclined to agree at least in terms of brevity(though I haven't checked the sources), pinging @Thomasamuse who moved it back in 2015 to see if they object. If so, an RM may be a better option. ASUKITE 17:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)- I'm not objecting, but this should go to a full RM under WP:PCM. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Agree, esp. after seeing the discussion on the talk page. Will open in a moment. ASUKITE 17:53, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not objecting, but this should go to a full RM under WP:PCM. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support. My searches suggest that the shorter version is indeed much more common in independent reliable sources than the longer one, and of course it's also preferable per WP:CONCISE. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)