Talk:WRDC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The section on NBC affiliate history mentions that WRDU frequently pre-empted NBC programming while making no mention of the problems they originally had with WTVD being granted first refusal on NBC programming, thus depriving WRDU of more popular NBC shows. There was a precedent-setting lawsuit or petition before the FCC (I don't know the exact details) which resulted in WRDU being freed from their second-class NBC affiliate status. It would be nice if someone who knew the details could clarify this bit of history.

Update: I see it's been added (echoing what's on the WTVD page) that WTVD retained its dual affiliation until 1971. Using that date I've been able to find someone else's less-than-definitive recollection (btw I used a search on 1971 WTVD WRDU FCC to look at the cached version of that link rather than creating an account at that site) that WRDU petitioned the FCC to mandate that networks have exclusive affiliation with one station in markets with more three commercial stations. Jaydro 06:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is some more information: Much to WRDU's chagrin, WTVD was able to take away any NBC programming it wanted and WRDU had no redress. That forced the substitutions; they were not willingly done as the article implies. WRDU finally got the FCC to rule that no dual network VHF station could take programming from a single network UHF station if the UHF station had a coverage area at least 66% as great as the VHF station, a requirement that WRDU just barely met. That ruling came in 1971; it was probably a "letter ruling" so it may be hard to find. Another problem was that the WRDU transmitter site was at the Orange/Chatham county line (next to the current WUNC-TV site) and WRDU's signal just couldn't make it across the terrain into Raleigh (the "Fairgrounds Ridge" effectively blocked the UHF signal, but only lessened the WUNC-TV/FM VHF signals). WRDU put a translator on channel 22 on Capital Towers in North Raleigh and another on channel 70 on top of the Wachovia building in the middle of the city, but they did little to help.

5/10/07 -- The paragraph above beginning "Here is some more information ..." is mine, but not the "I was an employee ...". Let's correct that. DSP

I was an employee of WRDU-TV in late 1973 into 1974. I can tell you that indeed its problems were mainly self-inflicted; the local newscast was a joke, the station frequently popped off the air, and anytime there were technical difficulties with the NBC feed (or anything else), the station resorted to the only local programming it had in abundance: a library of ancient black-and-white Popeye cartoons. Triangle Telecasters (the owner at the time) simply had no money to put into the station.

You seem to identify yourself of WCPE-FM[edit]

That's odd, you were a employee at a NBC affilate and then quit in 1975?, It looks like you did not want to become general manager of PBS station, WUNC-FM in Chapel Hill for no reason, too bad, WUNC does not use so much transmitters, but I wish you would had programmed WUNC as a classical station.

--4.188.69.137 06:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material[edit]

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

  1. WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
  2. As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
  3. WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
  4. Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 02:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Senior partner"[edit]

The article describes WLFL as the "senior partner" in the relationship with WRDC, and applies the same term to the WJZY/WMYT duopoly in Charlotte. I know what the article's describing (WLFL's owner first operated WRDC through an LMA, and then purchased the station outright), but I'm not sure "senior partner" is the applicable term. JTRH (talk) 01:55, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WRDC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

Merge Proposal and / or Redirect. Please do not modify it.
The result of the request for the Proposed Merger of {requested article} into this talk page's article was:

Merger was completed to target's history section per CONSENSUS. Supporters have better argument consistent with precedent and the Manual of Style; additionally, one oppose appears to be a single-purpose account, which drastically reduces it's weight.
— — — — —

WNAO-TV should be merged into WRDC, as content from the former article has been inserted into the latter. Even though they are separate stations from a licensing standpoint, they have a combined rich history. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:13, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • support. This article is more comprehensive and naturally includes all the same content, and the proposal seems not to be opposed. Homunq (࿓) 21:43, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • support for reasons given above. JTRH (talk) 22:09, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • oppose. The two stations, besides operating on the same UHF frequency in the same region, are in NO WAY related and share NO combined history. Separate license, to separate cities, separate ownership, and operations over a decade apart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:BFC0:8A:606F:90EB:EEC3:69E9 (talk) 02:27, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • oppose for reasons given above. --WashuOtaku (talk) 13:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
— — — — —
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a WP:PM.

Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

GenQuest "Talk to Me" 07:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A copy of this template can be found here.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WRDC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:26, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:WRDC&oldid=1198415351"