This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject National Basketball Association, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NBA on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Basketball AssociationWikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationTemplate:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationNBA articles
Lithopsian I am aware that the AfD closed as a redirect, however there was only 10 hours between my proposing a dab and the discussion being closed. I am aware that the other Walt Czarneckis have never had articles (nor would I argue for one), but the Team Penske VP's position has sources, and his name often comes up in news articles when giving quotes on behalf of Penske, hence why I believe it's a plausible search on Wikipedia and therefore worthy to create a dab out of (also I'm the one who added the hat to Detroit Gems). - "Ghost of Dan Gurney"(work / talk)03:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's why we have WP:HATNOTES. Being a plausible search term doesn't mean we have to have a dab page. When a dab page has only two entries (entries with no bluelink generally shouldn't be on any dab page), then it is usually most helpful to readers to redirect them to the most likely topic, with a hatnote so they can quickly click through in the minority of cases where the redirect is not where they wanted to go. Creating a dab page doesn't get anyone to where they want to go any quicker, gets some people to a place they didn't need to be instead of directly to where they wanted to be, and all in all only satisfies Wikipedia editors' desire to create lists for everything. Only when the hatnotes become too cumbersome or there really isn't a primary topic do we need a dab page (see APCC and NASA (disambiguation) for examples).
Going off in a totally different direction, disambiguation pages that list only items of the same type (eg. people) should usually become set index articles. A set index can be used to give additional information about the ambiguous term and the listed entries, whereas a disambiguation page is purely to get people to the article they wanted as painlessly as possible. In some cases, there may be a set index and a disambiguation page for the same term (eg. Cannon (surname) and Cannon (disambiguation) with the primary topic at Cannon). This case probably doesn't qualify because none of the people are really notable, but something else to consider. Lithopsian (talk) 17:22, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
