Talk:We R Who We R

We R Who We R has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 5, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
March 19, 2011	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
May 27, 2011	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Current status: Good article

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the We R Who We R article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

UK Release Date?[edit]

We now know that Cannibal the album is gonna be released at the same time as the US, but we've heard absolutely nothing about the single, not even a single radio play. Does anyone know when the single is gonna be released? Thanks Wiki Wonda (talk) 17:18, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Digital on January 17, the albums comes on January 30. http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/news/a287920/keha-new-music-video-is-arousing.html Fixer23 (talk) 07:18, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weird charts thing[edit]

the charts the charts !!!! are backward..please refresh teh charts —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.1.245.100 (talk) 01:59, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Yves (talk) 02:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

positions in the lists are wrong. and see the references already uploaded several positions. also in the hot japan 100 is in position 22. but the article is protected so I can not edit. EscucharLeer fonéticamente —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.87.153.160 (talk) 19:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added the Japan Hot 100 but all the peak position are correct. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 19:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

German downloads chart position[edit]

The album debuted at No. 20 on the official German downloads chart. Please add that, I can't edit due to the article's protection! source —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.216.159.8 (talk) 10:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request[edit]

{{editprotected}} Can someone remove the "Remix" version from the track listing section? The reference is now dead because Apple has taken the incorrectly released song from the iTunes Store.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just because Apple is not permitting downloads of the remix at the present moment, does that mean it doesn't exist? In what way was it "incorrectly released"? — $Jeff G. ツ$ 05:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was apparently an unofficial cover released by some other group of people.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:58, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Might it make sense to put that info in a separate section on derivative works or other versions? — $Jeff G. ツ$ 06:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or it's not notable because it was a blatant copyright violation and iTunes responded properly?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:13, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: Disabled, as discussion continues. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:28, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request #2[edit]

I was just going to mention in the chart performance that the song has jumped back up to number one on the ARIA charts, making it it's third week at the top position. ^[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.45.226 (talk) 08:19, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display_album.asp?chart=1G50

Edit request from Yvesnimmo, 28 November 2010[edit]

{{edit protected}} Please update the Australian certification to Platinum, which is supported by the source. The access date will need to be updated, too. Thanks!

Yves (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- œ ^™ 07:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Official UK Charts should read #1, as We R Who We R went #1 this week on a strong debut. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.250.101.184 (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✗ Not done WP:CHRYSTAL and WP:DEADLINE. Charts arnt out for over an hour. So they will not be updated until they come out, sorry. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 19:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

In the reception theres pretty much only positive views. Can't we show both sides? Cmon now. :T — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.41.123.245 (talk) 14:43, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Find reliable negative reviews. (Oh wait, they don't exist). - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 18:42, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inspiration and composition[edit]

I think this article is remiss in having fairly expansive sections on the song's musical elements and influences, but not mentioning Rascalz' "Northern Touch", from which it borrows a lot of its cadence and flow in the verse. 207.6.233.169 (talk) 23:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR - no source provided for that. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 17:55, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display_album.asp?chart=1G50

[1]