This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I think that this should not redirect to API, since Web APIs are an important topic on their own. Nor should it redirect to the possible synonym Web Services, since the current article defines Web Services as using WSDL and SOAP, and thusly defined Web API is not synonymous with Web Service, since not all Web APIs use these technologies. So in short I think that this should become an article. Boyprose (talk) 00:33, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
It occurs to me that this article might better be called API (web). Any comments? Boyprose (talk) 01:40, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
However browser, service and cache are not acronyms. I've added a redirect from API (web) and others, anyway. --Nemo 11:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
I believe that this concept is different enough from that of Web API to merit its own page. To me, web API implies a series of specified parameters that a developer uses to store/retrieve data from the back end or manipulate data and objects from the front end. Webhooks seem like more of a way to check for errors through verification processes, or to ensure that data stays 'fresh' 126.96.36.199 (talk) 20:15, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Web API, WebAPI or Web-API? I found all of them in use.  --Nemo 07:55, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
I believe the current "web API" is sufficient and its naming is inline with other similar articles. If you want to add redirects named such, that could be useful. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 15:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
I've moved it because WebAPI was a pseudo-duplicate and had a source for the name itself. --Nemo 11:00, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Actually it was not a duplicate but a different concept. I reversed the redirect and split the server-side concept from the client-side concept (Mozilla's WebAPI is a project for a set of client-side web APIs--W3C actually defines several of these; this is entirely a different thing from server-side web API and web services). Uzume (talk) 00:01, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
I recently moved ASP.NET MVC and in so doing that I realized that ASP.NET Web API is a separate framework from ASP.NET MVC (but both are included as a part of ASP.NET) so I updated the redirect and this article's lead dab hatnote to point to ASP.NET. Uzume (talk) 14:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
I took the liberty of removing the "For the Microsoft ASP.NET Web API..." block at the top. "ASP.NET Web API" apparently doesn't even rate its own page. More to the point, I very seriously doubt that a significant percentage of people who land on Web API are really looking for "ASP.NET Web API". However, for those few, so it doesn't get lost completely, I added an entry for it in the "See Also" section. That ought to suffice. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 16:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)