Talk:WikiProject Medicine

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Medicine

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles

Wikipedia

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of WikiProject Medicine be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Infobox and logo?

Which infobox and logo are most appropriate? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

added (change if it needs something more)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

wikidata

[1] if article is connected to wikidata,how do we populate it ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Authority_control authority control)?

[2] and/or
[3]

--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest AFD

At least three editors now in this discussion have opined that this article barely meets notability and should not exist (almost every source is not independent or is quoting someone who is not independent). It is unfortunate this navel-gazing was created; if someone takes it to AFD, I'll be a Delete per the obvious COI of the persons writing about themselves and being interviewed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and one editor being given special prominence was way out of order.[4] Graham Beards (talk) 14:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That makes four. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion

Consensus to merge. (Deletion requires WP:AfD and, once merged, the article history would need to be kept for attribution purposes.) czar 21:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

See #Suggest AFD and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Wikipedia entry for WikiProject Medicine (permalink).

I propose the rewritten content here be merged back from whence it came (Wikiproject), and this page be redirected to there.

Support, merge the rewritten content here and redirect this article back to WikiProject, from where the original content was split. There are marginal (and mostly non-independent) sources on this topic (written and published by WPMED members), some of the sources are merely interviews with involved members, some of the sources present outright falsehoods, and this article is navel gazing. Even one of the published authors agrees. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Second choice, delete per Colin (would require a trip to AFD I believe). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:57, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I concur. Graham Beards (talk) 15:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd rather go for delete. The Wikiproject article still briefly mentions WikiProject Medicine twice and that is sufficient imo. The originally forked content and the current revised text are both too much navel gazing. The Wikiproject article's job is to tell readers what a Wikiproject is, not for us to blow our own trumpets or self-cite our own "review" articles about how wonderful and important we are. -- Colin°^Talk 16:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The main article only mentions WPMED once now, because the second one failed verification (and also wasn't true). I support either a merge or deletion. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.