This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article seems to be quite bias in the information about rural health care. All of the information is unsourced and some of it is incorrect. The information should either be sourced or removed. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 00:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have to agree, the info has been in the article unsourced since November 2009. Unless someone can provide a source as to where these priorities came from, they should be removed.
WP:BLP states "We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high quality sources. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." If we are to follow policy, a case could probably be made to remove the info now. 04:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
I have deleted the information that was not sourced and that I felt was bias and made false accusations. As for her top three priorities that are unsourced I feel that time should be given to see if someone adds the information. I tagged a citation needed in January 2011 and I will give some more time to see if some sources it, if they do not I will delete it. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 04:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
