This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
While the version of the page that was deleted on 4 October 2014 was much shorter than the re-created version, that was because I'd removed some machine-translated stuff; there is little observable difference here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:56, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Gaétan Veillette 12:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
KEEP - This article present an important protected areas of Abitibi-Témiscamingue in Quebec covering territory of 1500 km2. This protected territory is major for the forestry in this region. It is surprising that the English-speaking internet user is against the existence of an article on "Zec Dumoine" when there are 85 other protected areas in Quebec that have the status of ZEC (meaning ni French "Zone d'exploitation contrôlé" or Controlled Harvesting Zone). These controlled zones established in 1978 by the Quebec government make the territory accessible to the general public. ZECs are administered actively by non-profit organizations for the exploitation of resources within the parameters established by law. It would be good if the protester instead invests in useful initiatives to advance the content of this universal encyclopedia, rather than asking to delete the articles that serve the public well. This article is well written and does not hurt anyone. This article is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. There is no valid reason to withdraw it.Veillg1 Gaétan Veillette 12:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)