Talk:Zytglogge

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zytglogge/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

• "Built at around the turn of the 13th century," → "Built in the early 13th century,"
• "When it was built – probably at around 1218–20[2] – the Zytglogge served as the gate tower of Berne's western fortifications. " → "When it was built around 1218–20,[2] the Zytglogge served as the gate tower of Berne's western fortifications. "
• "the Empire (see: Golden Charter of Bern). At " → "the Empire. At " – remove references like that tell the reader to "see" something because when they print it out, they can't click on it ;) Articles are supposed to be able to be understood in any medium, format, etc.
• The image in " Interior" is huge – perhaps use a width of 500px or so. It won't look good on small screens.
• " Bibliography" section goes after "References"
• Why is there an image in " References"? Move it somewhere else (the text that it is near must discuss it) or remove it.
• There are so many images, that I suggest staggering them per MOS:IMAGE

Gary King (talk) 19:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Y All done, thanks!  Sandstein  20:51, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zytglogge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061113171320/http://www.g26.ch:80/bern_zeitglocken.html to http://www.g26.ch/bern_zeitglocken.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zytglogge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061105154443/http://www.berninfo.com/en/navpage.cfm?category=SightsBET&subcat=ToursGroupsBET&id=32723 to http://www.berninfo.com/en/navpage.cfm?category=SightsBET&subcat=ToursGroupsBET&id=32723

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Zytglogge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Kept all cn tags have been addressed. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Some unsourced content. I have contacted the original nominator, and if they are willing, the article's GA status will be secure. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

I cannot identify the grounds for this request. "Some unsourced content" is exceedingly unspecific. In view of this discussion, I will address specific concerns that editors other than the nominator have. Sandstein 18:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

@Femke, in the discussion linked to above you asked about the two {{cn}} tags. From context and content I assume that I took these statements from Bellwald (1983), but I don't have the physical book and checking it out from the library again would be too much of a hassle, so I've deleted these sentences and the tags. Sandstein 18:55, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Brilliant. Thanks. You can find out if they were cited at the moment of insertion with mw:Who Wrote That. Great gadget to avoid having to find sources back again. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:45, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.