Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Calectasia cyanea

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 03:00, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Calectasia cyanea

[edit]

Calectasia cyanea

Created by Gderrin (talk), Casliber (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 12:46, 19 February 2015 (UTC).

  • 2444 B. Park part verified by online reference. New veried. Inline citation for "star of Bethlehem". Probably it could be better for a Christmas appearance. Also, IMO the hook can be made more interesting, if "restricted distribution in the Torndirrup National Park and Albany regions of the South West Botanical Province" (and no other place on Earth) can be capitalised. I strongly recommend the pictured can be removed from the hook. Redtigerxyz Talk 07:16, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • A couple of comments: while April Fool's could work, we're already far beyond the number of submissions that two slots can support, so it might not be able to run then. And, since Christmas is well over six weeks away, the hook cannot be saved for that special occasion: at this point, early May is as late as you can go. Sorry for the not-great news. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:38, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
  • @Yoninah: only birds have official names - many other organisms - fish/plants/insects have names which care used for other species etc. The name "blue tinsel lily" has been applied to a few....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:45, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
  • OK, let's move on this. New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. But I don't see an inline source for the hook fact. And it seems misleading to say in ALT1 that it is "only" found in the park, when the article states: "The Star of Bethlehem has a very restricted distribution in the Torndirrup National Park and Albany regions of the South West Botanical Province". Yoninah (talk) 20:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
  • If you look in ref 2, and Cntrl-F this text "As the species is only currently known from a single population within the Torndirrup National Park, it cannot be considered to have a fragmented distribution", you will see it. However, it doesn't seem to gell with the other ref, unless it is being optimistic about the range. I will just look at dates of journalsCas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:15, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you. ALT2 hook ref verified and cited inline. This is perfect for the quirky slot! Good to go Yoninah (talk) 21:39, 4 April 2015 (UTC)