Template:Did you know nominations/Chinko
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by —howcheng {chat} 23:04, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Chinko
[edit]- ... that Chinko Nature Reserve in the Central African Republic provides an undegraded habitat with the genetic diversity needed to recolonize animal populations in neighbouring regions?
- Reviewed: Alex Raisbeck
Created by Inkian Jason (talk). Nominated by Cwmhiraeth (talk) at 18:21, 1 April 2018 (UTC).
- New?
It was published as a draft on March 27.
- Long enough?
13,500 bytes
- Neutral/cites sources/free of plagiarism?
- a large portion of the hook is a quotation in the article, which can easily be rewritten as prose. It would be useful if you could add imperial units throughout the article.
- Hook format?
- Hook interesting?
- I would prefer "undisturbed" than "undegraded". The sentence doesn't read too well. Perhaps - "...that Chinko... supports a diverse ecosystem capable of recolonizing depleted animal populations in neighbouring regions?" Still a bit long. I'm not sure...
- Support ALT1, unsure whether to mention the country name or not. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- New?
So the article is almost in good shape. Clear up the bit with the quotation and the hook, and it should be good to go. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink: Sorry, I missed this. How about
- ALT1 ... that Chinko Nature Reserve in central Africa provides a natural habitat with the genetic diversity needed to reestablish animal populations in neighbouring regions? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Sounds good! But could you reword some of the prose in the article so it isn't a quotation? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink: It's not my article, but I have removed that particular quote. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- That's much better. Good to go! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:20, 24 April 2018 (UTC)