The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:04, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Overall: There are a few minor nitpicks but no outstanding policy issues. First, I think you should use {{infobox museum}} rather than {{infobox settlement}}. Also, I feel like there should be an "in media" section for the feature film Alleged, since that isn't history. However, this is just my observation and not something that should stop this nom from proceeding. epicgenius (talk) 03:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
@Epicgenius: Thanks for the review! Spshu has already addressed both of your suggestions for improvement with this edit. Michael Barera (talk) 05:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but I was wondering what is hooky about these hooks. They read like a brochure for the site. Yoninah (talk) 21:27, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
There are a few minor nitpicks but no outstanding policy issues. First, I think you should use {{infobox museum}} rather than {{infobox settlement}}. Also, I feel like there should be an "in media" section for the feature film Alleged, since that isn't history. However, this is just my observation and not something that should stop this nom from proceeding. epicgenius (talk) 03:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
