Template:Did you know nominations/Feliks Młynarski

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:36, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Feliks Młynarski, Młynarki[edit]

  • Reviewed: will do soon

Created by Piotrus (talk), Volunteer Marek (talk). Nominated by Piotrus (talk) at 10:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC).

Yeah, I was saving that hook for Operation Goral, which you know created. If we do Mlynarski separately then maybe a hook about the Triffin Dilemma would be noteworthy.Volunteer Marek (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Symbol question.svg Both articles are new enough and long enough and both the articles themselves and the hooks are adequately sourced. A search reveals no obvious copyviolations. Both images used in the articles are in the public domain. Once a QPQ is done, that will be good to go. Valenciano (talk) 08:39, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
@Valenciano and Volunteer Marek: Review done at Template:Did you know nominations/Beryl Randle. (Please note that the hook is now valid for three articles, as the Operation Góral article was expanded too). I'll have limited net access over the next week, so I hope VM can take over if there are any issues. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg I am taking the above review for Młynarki and Feliks Młynarski on trust. Re QPQ: On the one hand as a semi-self-nom you should be doing 3 QPQs for a triple nom. However on the other hand this is only a semi and you have done one, and I can donate the remaining two QPQs to you if necessary (just look through recent published DYK archives, linked on front page, to find my reviews). So I'm happy to clear the QPQ issue if you are, Piotrus.--Storye book (talk) 15:32, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Operation Góral: I take it that two of the articles in this triple are fully reviewed above, and that Operation Góral remains to be reviewed. It is new enough (created/expanded 10 and 11 June) and long enough. No disambig links found. No problems with access to external links except for the second link in the External links section, which was too slow for me. The article is objective and neutral; it is fully referenced. No copyvio or close paraphrasing found. Issues: (1) The links in the External links section need to be formatted. (2) The hook is not repeated in full in the Operation Góral article, e.g. the words "stole" and "młynarki" are not used there, and that means we cannot identify the right citation for it. Please write out the hook in the article, alongside its inline citation. When issues 1 and 2 are resolved, this nom should be OK. --Storye book (talk) 15:32, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
  • @Storye book: Elinks fixed, but I don't believe two is necessary. Młynarki is used in the lead, which also uses the words heist; that the hook uses verb to steal is I believe a common English synonym, and simplified and uncontroversial at that. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol voting keep.svg Thank you, Piotrus. All issues now resolved. The hook is in the header of Operation Góral and is referenced with Polish-language citation #1, taken AGF. Reviews of the other two articles in this triple, and the hook in each, have already been done above and are taken on trust. If there is any question of a requirement for three QPQs, then I'm donating some of mine to this nom. Good to go. --Storye book (talk) 20:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)