Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Megan Barton-Hanson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Megan Barton-Hanson

Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk). Self-nominated at 13:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Megan Barton-Hanson; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Megan Barton-Hanson - hooks ALT, ALT1, ALT2 and ALT3
[edit]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: This section of the review is only relevant to hooks ALT, ALT1, ALT2 and ALT3. Article is new enough, long enough, very well and clearly sourced, article is plagiariss free. Hooks are cited and intersting, but I am striking ALT2 we're talking about a BLP. I'm on the fence about ALT3 - but as the nominator says the fact that cock destroyer got deleted makes it weaker. I've added one request for clarification to the article - if that could be addressed I can OK it. Lajmmoore (talk) 09:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Hey Tracey - hooks ALT, ALT4 and ALT5
[edit]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: This section of the review is only relevant to hooks ALT, ALT4 and ALT5. There's a couple of places where I've asked for clarification as it's not clear to me how the information fits in with the topic, it would be great if they could be addressed to help the reader. Otherwise article is new enough, long enough, well sourced, neutral, plagiarism free, QPQ is done. Hooks are cited and interesting. Although I do not like ALT4 personally. Lajmmoore (talk) 09:51, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Overall comments
[edit]
  • ALT (double nomination), ALT1 and ALT5 appear to me to be the strongest hooks. I think some behind-the-scenes technical detail might be needed to link Hey Tracey to this nomination (that is beyond me though). If the clarifications are addressed, both can be OK'd. Thanks for creating the articles @Launchballer: Lajmmoore (talk) 09:51, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
    • Getting Personal is an online store, which I've added. I've also expanded the lede of Hey Tracey - the relevance is that Abadi and Pollard are format developers, and that the show quite literally involves people irritating people with humorous phone calls, but perhaps it would be better that readers had that information to begin with.--Launchballer 10:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
I did put in a request that Megan's article run on 6 March, is this possible?--Launchballer 13:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)