The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Overall: The first hook I find is good, though the second I don't really think is interesting enough, so I'd go for the first one. Length is fine and everything is sourced. However, Earwig's Copyvio Detector detected a possible copyright violation, so I'm a bit concerned about that. I'm quite new to DYK reviewing, so I'd like a second opinion on this one.mike•owendiscuss 19:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
@MikeOwen: I've trimmed the length of the article's quotation of the USA Today review, which should solve the concern. feminist (talk) 06:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
@Feminist: I just run the Copyvio Detector again, and everything seems fine. I can't see any other problems, so I feel confident passing the first hook. Have a great day :) mike•owendiscuss 10:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)