Template:Did you know nominations/Nutrition Technologies
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 15:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Returned to draft space
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nutrition Technologies
- ... that Nutrition Technologies is a company which provides new feed sources for an increasing agriculture, aquaculture, and animal industry worldwide? Source: "The company manufactures and supplies sustainable oils, proteins, and frass to help feed the increasing agriculture, aquaculture, and animal feed industries across the world." (and [1]
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Created by HIMeal2000 (talk). Nominated by RTG (talk) at 13:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC).
@RTG: QPQ required. This article is new enough and long enough. I do have some serious content worries. The name of the creating user makes me kind of think that the article creator might have a conflict of interest. The hook source seems like a corporate puff piece (the hook itself sounds promotional!), and I think that the article really needs to be looked at for quality sourcing that is not routine coverage of press release-type material. I would like to see some attempt to engage this sourcing (and even article tone) issue before I consider it for DYK. Raymie (t • c) 05:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Awk... it's not really a hooky article is it. I was only interested in it because I was repulsed by it, thinking this is the sort of thing a coronavirus might come off, but nobody else is going to see it like that. When I look for a notable write up it's not there. I thought maybe others would be repulsed by it too but the opposite of love is not hate. It's a sort of emptiness. No, I don't think I should have put it up for a DYK, sorry if wasting your time Ramie! ~ R.T.G 09:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- This shows all the signs of undisclosed paid editing. I think this needs discussion at dyk talk. —valereee (talk) 15:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
This article has been moved back to draft space as suspected undisclosed paid editing. Therefore not eligible for DYK. If cleaned up and moved back to article space, this article could be re-nominated at DYK, but no need to keep this failing nomination open indefinitely for that. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
