The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: New and neutral, right length (article could use a little more volume, but the material to do that is present), each para. and key hook facts sourced, Earwig-OK, hook is solid - the most "hooky" point is the "Granny" concept, and that's there, along with one prize - I think that's the main points extracted at this stage in article development. Image seems clear at 100 px. Hook length was a concern, but there's one alt from Grimes2, and I offer another - the original hook does not pass. So for Alt 0a or Alt1, once QPQ is in, ready to go. SeoR (talk) 18:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
New and neutral, right length (article could use a little more volume, but the material to do that is present), each para. and key hook facts sourced, Earwig-OK, hook is solid - the most "hooky" point is the "Granny" concept, and that's there, along with one prize - I think that's the main points extracted at this stage in article development. Image seems clear at 100 px. Hook length was a concern, but there's one alt from Grimes2, and I offer another - the original hook does not pass. So for Alt 0a or Alt1, once QPQ is in, ready to go. SeoR (talk) 18:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)