The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by SL93 (talk) 23:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Very close paraphrasing of sources, particularly these two: , . Article will need to be completely rewritten to address this. DoctorKubla (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Unacceptable close paraphrasing has not been addressed; sole edit by author was to change some capitalizations. I just checked to confirm DoctorKubla's findings, and found one instance where the source being closely paraphrased wasn't the one given for the paragraph (it was the other of the two mentioned above). Article has been tagged with "close paraphrasing" template, and nomination is being closed as unacceptable for the main page. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:48, 18 August 2013 (UTC)