The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Overall: It was rather easy this time. The article is new* and long enough, sourcing is fairly good, no neutrality or plagiarism issues. The hook is approved. Basically, no objections to the nomination, the article just makes it. (* just a sidenote: you didn't really create it; rather, you converted the article from a redirect. That's not an issue for me, because you've done so within 7 days of the nomination, but you should have written redirect in front of status, rather than new.). PS. I've made some minor fixes in language - these did not influence the breadth of coverage. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 07:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
@Piotrus and Szmenderowiecki: I'm happy to promote this hook, but proverbs are pithy, and that naturally lends itself to a hook, so this may have room to improve. How about:
ALT1: That the oldest known Polish proverb, dating to 1407, translates to "when bast can be torn, then tear it"?
It was rather easy this time. The article is new* and long enough, sourcing is fairly good, no neutrality or plagiarism issues. The hook is approved. Basically, no objections to the nomination, the article just makes it. (* just a sidenote: you didn't really create it; rather, you converted the article from a redirect. That's not an issue for me, because you've done so within 7 days of the nomination, but you should have written