Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Rogue & Gambit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 12:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Rogue & Gambit

[edit]
  • ... that although X-Men characters Rogue and Gambit had been in a romantic relationship since the 1990s, they did not headline a comic book together until the 2018 miniseries Rogue & Gambit? Source

Created by Cambalachero (talk) and Argento Surfer (talk). Nominated by Argento Surfer (talk) at 16:48, 9 May 2018 (UTC).

  • This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are sourced inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. The required QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:04, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
ALT1: ...that Rogue & Gambit is the first X-Men comic headlined by the X-Men characters Rogue and Gambit?
This one is basically the same, but focusing on the publication and skiping the relation between the characters. It's still relevant information (that's why it's them and not, say, "Rogue & Cyclops" or "Magik & Gambit"), but that is explained in the article itself. Cambalachero (talk) 12:32, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: does Alt1 work for you? Argento Surfer (talk) 17:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5 and Cwmhiraeth: Is this ok to move forward? I can't find the template on the Noms page or in a prep or queue... Argento Surfer (talk) 11:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
  • @Argento Surfer: I've added the nomination back to the pending nominations page. Right now there's a discussion at WT:DYK on the status of that supplementary guideline about fiction, so perhaps in the meantime, maybe you can try proposing another alternate hook? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:13, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
There has been a discussion on the DYK rule concerned, with different people interpreting it in different ways. I thought the original hook complied with the rules. I also thought ALT1 did and I also approve ALT2. Time to get this promoted! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I also fail to see the problem in the original hook, which is also written with more punch. I'm promoting it. Yoninah (talk) 12:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)