Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/The Firebrand

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of The Firebrand's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 11:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC).

The Firebrand

[edit]

5x expanded by Ruby2010 (talk). Self nominated at 21:35, 10 March 2013 (UTC).

    • Yeah, I did know that... I read the book many years ago. So I know that the hook is true, but there is no reference to this in the article, even in the synopsis, just an assertion in the lead. However, ALT1 is sourced to an offline source. AGF - but I know it to be true too. Otherwise, article is new enough, long enough, fully referenced. QPQ done. Good to go with ALT1. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:48, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for reviewing! I added a citation to the lead confirming the accuracy of the first hook, if any DYK admin wishes to use it. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 04:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)