Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Tilly Edinger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Tilly Edinger's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2013 (UTC).

Tilly Edinger

[edit]

Created by Keilana (talk). Self nom at 22:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC).

  • This interesting article is newly created and long enough. It is in general well sourced but the hook fact is not supported by an inline citation, a requirement for DYK. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
  • It should be cited to Yount 1999, the article says "While there, she wrote the founding work of paleoneurology" and that sentence is cited. I didn't cite in the lead because it's cited and discussed in the body. Want me to drop a citation in the lead? Keilana|Parlez ici 16:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Specifically, "While there, she wrote the founding work of paleoneurology..." in the Career and legacy section. I see no reason to object right now. Nyttend (talk) 04:34, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
  • You're right, and it's perfectly well cited. It had not occurred to me that the statement "she wrote the founding work of paleoneurology" meant that she had founded "paleoneurology". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
  • I overlook things like this all the time; no complaints. I've nowiki-ed your DYK? up above so that someone quickly can see that you've approved it. Nyttend (talk) 07:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Please do not nowiki previous icons. I've restored it. When I promote a hook, it's important that I can see the history of the review. The icon at the bottom is what we look for to see if a hook should be ready for promotion. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks everybody, sorry for the confusion. Keilana|Parlez ici 16:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)