This template is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
It looks fine to me—the years that end in 0 are categorized under the 0; those that end in 1 under the 1, etc. What could be more logical for a by-decade category? Good Ol’factory(talk) 06:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm not questioning the order; it just looks bad with a heading for each member. The headings don't help in any way so there's no use having them. McLerristarr | Mclay1 10:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Why though? Isn't this just a subjective assessment? How do they not help at all when each header corresponds to the appropriate year within the decade? 1994 appears under the "4" in the 1990s—subjectively, this makes sense to me and looks fine. Good Ol’factory(talk) 08:33, 10 July 2011 (UTC)