Template talk:Taxonomy/Tetrapoda

Template:Taxonomy/Tetrapoda is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Animals

Taxonomy/Tetrapoda is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

`|always_display=`

I've reverted this edit since historically we've not included this globally on all tetrapod taxoboxes. The change would affect every single mammal, bird, reptile, et cetera, and the change would have an effect on the visual output. Therefore, I'd say if the parameter is set to true for this particular minor rank taxon, it ought to be discussed first by all relevant WikiProjects. Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for change of interwiki

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Could someone please modify the mk interwiki to

[[mk:Шаблон:Автотаксономија/Четириношци]]

. Thanks a alot! --B. Jankuloski (talk) 11:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Killiondude (talk) 05:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Skip template

Linking the parent to teleosts seems odd and uninformative of the actual parent clades. Why not use a skip template to link it to a dummy version of Elpistostegalia, as here? [1] This will allow the taxobox to display the correct parent without forcing all the fish supertaxa into tetrapod taxoboxes. Dinoguy2 (talk) 14:15, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested change

The taxobox for the Tetrapod article doesn't look right. I think it should go something like this:

Subphylum: Vertebrata
Infraphylum: Gnathostomata (jawed fishes / jawed vertebrates)
Superclass: Osteichthyes (bony fishes / bony vertebrates)
Class: Sarcopterygii (lobe-finned fishes / fleshy-limbed vertebrates)
Subclass: Rhipidistia (Dipnotetrapodomorpha)
Clade: Tetrapodomorpha

The first three (from top to bottom) should be familiar to most people. The last three are less familiar, but are the immediate supertaxons of Tetrapoda; in effect, stepping stones to the more familiar ones above. Zyxwv99 (talk) 01:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 5 September 2015

I do not understand the format nor read the instructions on how to do so, so I did it like this I just want to add "Class = Reptilia" in the taxinomic account of Monitor Lizar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.198.83.214 (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request for change of parent

Could someone change the parent to Tetrapodomorpha?

{{Don't edit this line {{{machine code|}}}
|rank=superclassis
|link=Tetrapod|Tetrapoda
|parent=Tetrapodomorpha
}}

The current link to Teleostomi skips a half-dozen important branches. Thanks!—wing gundam 18:37, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As the classification hierarchy stands, this can't be done, because it would generate the sequence of ranks:

Superclass: Osteichthyes

Class: Sarcopterygii

Clade: Rhipidistia

Clade: Tetrapodomorpha

Superclass: Tetrapoda

i.e. a superclass with a class and another superclass above it. The underlying problem is that sourced systems used in different areas of the tree of life are not compatible with one another, so we have to make compromises to fit them together. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I propose changing the parent for Sarcopterygii to Euteleostomi rather than Osteichthys in order to solve this issue. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 02:42, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 3 January 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Teleostomi is a polyphyletic group and therefore isn't valid Ankylodactylus27 (talk) 03:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. It is probably better to post your thoughts at Talk:Teleostomi or Talk:Tetrapod. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 17 February 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I want to include "Stegocephali" Ruasonrac (talk) 14:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit template-protected}} template. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 15:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stegocephalia had been included as the parent with [this edit] back in 2018. It was then reverted back to Teleostomi in 2023 with the edit summary, "change creates inconsistent ranks: superclass has superclass as parent; needs more thought". Editor Ruasonrac, you might try building a consensus at WT:WikiProject Tree of Life. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 15:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]