The 1619 Project: Revision history

5 July 2024

• curprev 15:2215:22, 5 July 2024‎ MattMauler talk contribs‎ m 72,052 bytes +4‎ ce: apostrophe not in italics undo

28 June 2024

• curprev 12:4412:44, 28 June 2024‎ LastDodo talk contribs‎ 72,048 bytes −1‎ Undid revision 1230874191 by 50.221.225.231 (talk) I think 'question' is clearer. 'Criticize' could be taken to mean criticizing the fact that it is historically accurate. undo Tag: Undo

25 June 2024

• curprev 05:3705:37, 25 June 2024‎ 50.221.225.231 talk‎ 72,049 bytes +1‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

16 June 2024

• curprev 08:3808:38, 16 June 2024‎ 2600:1700:79a0:e530:2983:276:a77:ae9c talk‎ 72,048 bytes +36‎ →‎Background: corrected/updated the 1901 illustration to better reflect the reality that the it's an image of the first enslaved Africans... undo Tag: Visual edit

7 June 2024

• curprev 12:1812:18, 7 June 2024‎ LastDodo talk contribs‎ 72,012 bytes −21‎ Moved 'american history wars' reference from the very first line (dont know why it was there) to the beginning of the second paragraph, which discusses criticism, controversy etc. Not sure it really adds much but have edited on the conservative side in case there is a good reason for its inclusion. undo

2 June 2024

• curprev 16:4116:41, 2 June 2024‎ Dumuzid talk contribs‎ 72,033 bytes −354‎ Undid revision 1226915215 by Meanderingbartender (talk) Apologies, but I am going to revert this for being undue; the article itself is purely speculative (noting that at the time they couldn't be sure) and I can't find much follow up undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 15:1715:17, 2 June 2024‎ Meanderingbartender talk contribs‎ 72,387 bytes +354‎ Undid revision 1226827812 by 81.108.173.159 (talk) Statement is backed up from the reference undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 02:1802:18, 2 June 2024‎ 81.108.173.159 talk‎ 72,033 bytes −354‎ →‎Background: Statement misrepresents findings in referenced article. undo Tags: Reverted references removed

8 May 2024

• curprev 14:1514:15, 8 May 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 72,387 bytes +8‎ Altered template type. Added magazine. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Anas1712 | Category:The New York Times | #UCB_Category 30/81 undo

7 May 2024

• curprev 22:2022:20, 7 May 2024‎ Pngdeity talk contribs‎ 72,379 bytes −45‎ removed Category:1619 establishments in Virginia using HotCat undo

21 April 2024

• curprev 06:5406:54, 21 April 2024‎ KlayCax talk contribs‎ 72,424 bytes +252‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 06:5306:53, 21 April 2024‎ KlayCax talk contribs‎ 72,172 bytes +69‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 01:1601:16, 21 April 2024‎ Sangdeboeuf talk contribs‎ 72,103 bytes +20‎ →‎Accompanying material and activities: Wikilink One World (imprint) undo

23 March 2024

• curprev 22:2722:27, 23 March 2024‎ Saucysalsa30 talk contribs‎ 72,083 bytes −10‎ The entire book covers the 1619 Project, not only 1 page. undo
• curprev 22:1322:13, 23 March 2024‎ Saucysalsa30 talk contribs‎ 72,093 bytes +378‎ Emmy award undo

22 March 2024

• curprev 18:2918:29, 22 March 2024‎ GuardianH talk contribs‎ 71,715 bytes −19‎ MOS:EDITORIAL undo Tag: Visual edit

21 March 2024

• curprev 20:5520:55, 21 March 2024‎ Dovid talk contribs‎ 71,734 bytes −31‎ Nonsensical phrasing or fractured syntax, probably due to the unnecessary length of the parenthetical insertion undo Tag: Visual edit

14 March 2024

• curprev 10:3810:38, 14 March 2024‎ 2001:5a8:4260:3100:114d:b30e:beeb:7a2d talk‎ 71,765 bytes 0‎ MOS:LQ (verified with original source material - there is no comma there in it) undo
• curprev 10:3510:35, 14 March 2024‎ 2001:5a8:4260:3100:114d:b30e:beeb:7a2d talk‎ 71,765 bytes +3‎ →‎Historical accuracy: MOS:LQ, semantic markup undo

1 March 2024

• curprev 03:4403:44, 1 March 2024‎ Acroterion talk contribs‎ 71,762 bytes −524‎ Reverted 1 edit by Mikalra (talk): No, you're using an opinion piece as a refernc e, and you need to start at the article that's linked and get consensus there, not here undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 03:4303:43, 1 March 2024‎ Mikalra talk contribs‎ 72,286 bytes +524‎ Yes according to the linked article. "The first Africans to arrive in America in 1619 were sold into bondage as indentured servants, not as slaves, and that distinction really matters. " Undid revision 1211156093 by Acroterion (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 03:3903:39, 1 March 2024‎ Acroterion talk contribs‎ 71,762 bytes −524‎ Reverted 1 edit by Mikalra (talk): Not according to the linked article undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
• curprev 03:3703:37, 1 March 2024‎ Mikalra talk contribs‎ 72,286 bytes +524‎ Persons brought to VA in 1619 were indentured servants undo Tag: Reverted

17 February 2024

• curprev 13:4113:41, 17 February 2024‎ David Gerard talk contribs‎ 71,762 bytes −507‎ rm questionable thinktank source, redundant undo

14 February 2024

• curprev 20:3820:38, 14 February 2024‎ Dumuzid talk contribs‎ m 72,269 bytes +3‎ Reverted edit by 164.106.75.251 (talk) to last version by Doric Loon undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 20:3720:37, 14 February 2024‎ 164.106.75.251 talk‎ 72,266 bytes −3‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

12 February 2024

• curprev 12:5312:53, 12 February 2024‎ Doric Loon talk contribs‎ 72,269 bytes −29‎ Removing some sloppy writing. The Union is not a "figure". undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

11 February 2024

• curprev 17:4117:41, 11 February 2024‎ Alanscottwalker talk contribs‎ 72,298 bytes +43‎ →‎top: add undo
• curprev 17:3817:38, 11 February 2024‎ Alanscottwalker talk contribs‎ 72,255 bytes +75‎ →‎top: add undo

6 February 2024

• curprev 17:5617:56, 6 February 2024‎ Chaotic Enby talk contribs‎ m 72,180 bytes −2‎ Reverted edits by 2601:204:C700:99:5846:9660:C460:CF63 (talk) (AV) undo Tags: AntiVandal Rollback
• curprev 17:5417:54, 6 February 2024‎ 2601:204:c700:99:5846:9660:c460:cf63 talk‎ 72,182 bytes +2‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 02:5502:55, 6 February 2024‎ Dumuzid talk contribs‎ 72,180 bytes −63‎ Undid revision 1203967916 by 2601:204:C700:99:F589:E793:682D:348B (talk) apologies, but this edit resulted in non-grammatical double-talk undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 02:5202:52, 6 February 2024‎ 2601:204:c700:99:f589:e793:682d:348b talk‎ 72,243 bytes +63‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 02:5102:51, 6 February 2024‎ 2601:204:c700:99:f589:e793:682d:348b talk‎ 72,180 bytes +133‎ No edit summary undo

21 January 2024

• curprev 02:3902:39, 21 January 2024‎ SamuelRiv talk contribs‎ 72,047 bytes −72‎ Undid revision 1197569375 by Usedtobecool (talk) ctrl+f the quote -- it's literally WP:HEADLINE. The article makes no note of the body of historians being large or small. Remove. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 02:2102:21, 21 January 2024‎ Usedtobecool talk contribs‎ 72,119 bytes +72‎ Undid revision 1197522528 by Saucysalsa30 (talk) it's not in wikivoice, it's cites and attributes a source, so not as obvious as you make it sound. bring your sources that say otherwise undo Tags: Undo Reverted

20 January 2024

• curprev 21:4921:49, 20 January 2024‎ Saucysalsa30 talk contribs‎ 72,047 bytes −72‎ Fixed misleading wording. Out of context, this makes it read like the 1619 project hasn't received much criticism or otherwise implies it has broad support with little criticism. Instead the article describes one particular instance of some leading scholars in the field collaborating to write a letter to the project's authors as a "small group of scholars". undo Tag: Reverted

18 January 2024

• curprev 04:5504:55, 18 January 2024‎ Encyclopedia Lu talk contribs‎ 72,119 bytes +161‎ What was the issue with this version of the edit, which corrected the grammatical error I inadvertently added? undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 03:2503:25, 18 January 2024‎ Tad Lincoln talk contribs‎ 71,958 bytes −161‎ Restored revision 1195278836 by Wolfita (talk) undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 03:2303:23, 18 January 2024‎ Tad Lincoln talk contribs‎ 72,119 bytes 0‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

17 January 2024

• curprev 13:0713:07, 17 January 2024‎ Encyclopedia Lu talk contribs‎ m 72,119 bytes +24‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 13:0613:06, 17 January 2024‎ Encyclopedia Lu talk contribs‎ m 72,095 bytes +137‎ Adding some context to the controversy over the removal. (Unfortunately, archive.org doesn’t load the page right, so we can’t confirm Mr. Silverstein’s statement, although we could perhaps consult memories.) undo Tag: Reverted

13 January 2024

• curprev 04:4704:47, 13 January 2024‎ Wolfita talk contribs‎ 71,958 bytes −5‎ Grammar undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

12 January 2024

• curprev 18:5718:57, 12 January 2024‎ QuietHere talk contribs‎ m 71,963 bytes −4‎ Italics undo

10 January 2024

• curprev 16:0516:05, 10 January 2024‎ Bcorr talk contribs‎ 71,967 bytes +38‎ Reverted good faith edits by 68.129.210.149 (talk): These mentions are appropriate in the contect of this section undo Tags: Twinkle Undo

3 January 2024

• curprev 11:2211:22, 3 January 2024‎ 68.129.210.149 talk‎ 71,929 bytes −38‎ It appears some mentions of "conservative" when speaking of a source are potentially motivated by politics. We dont use the liberal or progressive for any sources described as such. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

30 December 2023

• curprev 06:2406:24, 30 December 2023‎ Saucysalsa30 talk contribs‎ m 71,967 bytes −1‎ Minor copyedit undo
• curprev 06:2206:22, 30 December 2023‎ Saucysalsa30 talk contribs‎ 71,968 bytes +37‎ Restored revision 1192279602 by Badger 1C4C39 (talk): "The" in The New York Times, The Atlantic, and other publications is formally part of their names. undo Tags: Twinkle Undo

29 December 2023

• curprev 14:3914:39, 29 December 2023‎ 74.101.228.225 talk‎ 71,931 bytes 0‎ →‎Journalistic reaction: title and punctuation undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 14:3414:34, 29 December 2023‎ 74.101.228.225 talk‎ 71,931 bytes +4‎ →‎Response: syntax undo Tag: Reverted