Jump to content

Transport Integration Act 2010

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sandgem Addict (talk | contribs) at 13:01, 7 May 2016 (typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Clifton Hill railway station provides an example of integrated transport and land use planning at local level. The station services suburban trains to and from the city of Melbourne on the Hurstbridge and South Morang railway lines. Bus services operate near the station on Hoddle Street. The station also has a number of bicycle racks. In addition, the station has car parking facilities and is within walking distance of tram services on Queens Parade.

The Transport Integration Act 2010 (the Act)[1] is a law enacted by the Parliament of the State of Victoria, Australia. The Act is the prime transport statute in Victoria, having replaced major parts of the Transport Act 1983, which was renamed as the Transport (Compliance and Miscellaneous) Act 1983.[2]

The purpose of the Transport Integration Act is to "...create a new framework for the provision of an integrated and sustainable transport system in Victoria...".[3] The Act broadly seeks to unify all elements of the Victorian transport portfolio to ensure that transport and land use agencies work together towards the common goal of an integrated and sustainable transport system.

In essence, the Transport Integration Act sets out the policy framework for transport in Victoria and establishes and sets the charters of the key agencies who make decisions which affect the planning and operation of the State's transport system.

One commentator has opined that "(T)he Act is a leading example of modern and progressive principles-based legislation. It marked a fundamental shift away from detailed, prescriptive rules to higher level guidance and more flexible outcomes.[4]"

The Transport Integration Act is administered by the Minister for Public Transport, the Hon Jacinta Allan MLA, and the Minister for Ports and Minister for Roads, the Hon Luke Donnellan MLA.

Outline

The Transport Integration Act has policy, planning, delivery and organisational elements.

Transport

Shot of the airport control tower and a United B747 at Melbourne Airport. Transport to and from the airport is currently only available by car or bus. The absence of an integrated rail link has been a matter of public debate in Victoria in recent years.

The policy area of the Act contains a vision, objectives and principles for the transport system in Victoria,[5] making it clear that the transport system needs to be integrated and sustainable - in economic terms, in environmental terms and in social terms. The Act therefore establishes transport in Victoria as a triple bottom line issue.

The Act also consolidates and establishes most of the transport agencies in Victoria[6] and applies its policy framework to those agencies and other non transport interface agencies whose planning and land use activities can have significant effects on the transport system.

Planning

While comprehensive coverage of transport portfolio matters can be expected of a transport statute the most radical feature of the Transport Integration Act may be its reach into planning activities which are not administrated by transport agencies but which nonetheless can have a major impact on the transport system. Withington observed that "(F) for the first time, the scope of the State's principal transport statute reaches beyond transport agencies to include "interface bodies" such as planning authorities and land managers".[7]

The Act also requires the development of a transport plan for Victoria and requires that the plan be periodically revised.[8] It also requires transport agencies regulated by the Act to prepare corporate plans and to coordinate them with the central Department of Transport and other affected transport agencies.[9]

Effects

Withington observed that "(T) the Act is designed to encourage people to think - in a structured way - about the impacts of their decisions on the transport system. It is detailed enough to provide clear direction, but also flexible enough to accommodate agencies' different roles and responsibilities and a wide range of different circumstances".[10]

Parts

A train loaded with containers at Swanson Dock East at the Port of Melbourne. Legislation like the Transport Integration Act and its underlying policy framework seeks to prompt State and local government agencies to improve transport and land use integration. Future Government policies and projects can be expected to result in improved rail connectivity at places like Victoria's ports.

The Transport Integration Act is divided into eight parts -

  1. Preliminary
  2. Vision statement, Objectives, Principles and Statements of Policy Principles
  3. Administration (Ministers, Department of Transport, the Secretary, the Transport Infrastructure Development Agent)
  4. Planning (Transport plan, Corporate plans)
  5. Transport System Agencies (Director of Public Transport, Public Transport Development Authority, Roads Corporation, Taxi Services Commission)
  6. Transport Corporations (Victorian Rail Track, V/Line Corporation, Linking Melbourne Authority, Port of Melbourne Corporation, Port of Hastings Development Authority, Victorian Regional Channels Authority)
  7. Transport Safety Agencies (Director, Transport Safety and Chief Investigator, Transport Safety)
  8. General

Coverage

The coverage of the Act is broad and extends to all State-controlled transport activities including most land and water-based transport and some air transport activities.

Transport system activities

The Act applies to most State transport agencies and their activities through its coverage of Victoria's "transport system".[11] Accordingly, it applies[12] to things such as -

"Transport system" is defined widely to include not only system infrastructure and conveyances, but also such things[15] as -

  • communication systems and other technologies
  • strategic, business and operational plans
  • schedules, timetables and ticketing systems
  • labour components
  • service components.

The Act's coverage of the transport system is therefore extensive. This occurs because "(T) the (Act) recognises that a 21st century transport system should be conceived and planned as a single system performing multiple tasks rather than separate transport modes. Accordingly, the TIA seeks to define the transport system broadly including public transport on road and rail, commercial road and rail transport, private motor vehicles, commercial and recreational water transport, walking and cycling."[16]

Land use and other activities affecting transport

The Transport Integration Act also seeks to integrate land use and transport planning and decision-making by extending the framework to land use agencies whose decisions can have significant impact on transport.[17]

Accordingly, the Act can apply to the activities of a range of planning, land use and other agencies. Generally, the Transport Integration Act "...provides that planning authorities must have regard to the policy framework when preparing a Planning Scheme Amendment...which is 'likely to have a significant impact on the planning system' ".[18]

Overarching status of Act

The Transport Integration Act has an overarching status in the hierarchy of Victoria's transport legislation. All other Victorian transport laws, including those relating to particular aspects of the regulation of trains, trams, roads, ports, transport projects and safety, are identified as "transport legislation" under the Act[19] and are therefore captured by the framework and are subordinate to it.

The Act also sits above "interface legislation" in its application to interface bodies.[20] That is, the Act captures the enabling legislation which creates and empowers the non transport agencies who have a significant impact on the transport system and requires those agencies to have regard to the key policy elements in the Act needed to guide sound transport and land use planning.

Affected agencies

Transport agencies

The current North East Rail Revitalisation project will improve transport integration in the north east of Victoria. The project includes a rail bypass of Wodonga and track upgrades between Melbourne and Albury-Wodonga to improve interstate rail freight and passenger services links.

The transport decision makers and agencies established and empowered by the Transport Integration Act include -

The Act requires Victorian transport agencies - including the Director of Public Transport, the Public Transport Development Authority, VicRoads, the Port of Melbourne Corporation, VicTrack, V/Line and the Linking Melbourne Authority – to work collaboratively towards the common goal of an integrated and sustainable transport system.

Private transport operators

The Act does not apply directly to the private entities contracted to provide metropolitan passenger rail and tram services in Victoria, nor does it apply to metropolitan and regional bus operators. However, State transport agencies must have regard to the framework under the Act when exercising statutory functions in relation to these private transport operators (including contract management).[22]

Interface agencies

The interface decision makers and agencies affected by the Transport Integration Act include -

  • relevant Victorian Government Ministers including the Minister for Planning
  • the Department of Planning and Community Development
  • the Growth Areas Authority
  • the Department of Sustainability and Environment
  • Parks Victoria
  • Major Projects Victoria
  • Places Victoria, formerly VicUrban
  • municipal councils

The Act requires that the interface agencies, including land use agencies, take account of the new Act and its policy directions when making decisions that are likely to have a significant impact on the transport system.[23]

Importantly, the Transport Integration Act also supports and assists the development, implementation and updating of a transport plan for the State.[24]

Policy framework

General

The centrepiece of the Transport Integration Act is the high level policy framework contained in Part 2. The key features of the policy framework are a vision for the transport system, six transport system objectives and seven decision making principles. The core of the policy framework is drawn from the principles of sustainability as applied to the transport sector. The framework recognises that transport is part of a broader policy goal of achieving sustainable development, both locally and globally.

Sustainability

Trams pass trains on the Flinders Street Viaduct in the Melbourne CBD.
"At the beginning of the 21st century, "sustainable development" or "sustainability" had been endorsed almost universally as an agreed goal and direction for the activities of nations, states, businesses and communities across the world. ... sustainability has become a common theme in Government policy documents. A survey of those documents indicates that sustainability is no longer an issue of marginal or purely environmental concern. It is an issue of mainstream concern to governments at all levels".[25]

In general, the policy framework in the Act adopts the core principles of sustainable development or sustainability and translates that policy into a contemporary and enforceable legislative form in a transport context. The key sustainability concepts which influenced the content of the policy framework[26] are the -

  • principle of integration of economic, environmental and social factors: decision making for sustainable development should effectively integrate economic, environmental and social factors
  • principle of futurity and equity: the present generation should ensure that it considers the needs of future generations when making decisions and conducting activities (inter-generational equity); the present generation should also ensure that the needs of all people are met fairly (intra-generational equity)
  • principle of protection of biological diversity and ecological integrity: the present generation should ensure that the health, diversity and productivity of the environment is maintained or enhanced for the benefit of future generations
  • precautionary principle: where there are threats of serious or irreversible environmental damage, lack of full scientific certainty should not postpone measures to prevent environmental degradation
  • principle of participation and community capacity: all groups should be involved in decision making for sustainability and local communities should be actively engaged in deciding what future they want.[27]

Having established the key sustainability principles, the next step in the review was to apply those principles to the transport sector. Robert Pearce and Ian Shepherd observed that -

" The concept of sustainable transport, as an application of sustainability to transport, originally grew out of concerns to minimise the harmful environmental effects associated with our increasing use of transport (particularly automobiles). However, the concept has evolved to require a more explicit link to the achievement of the triple bottom line, rather than purely addressing environmental concerns, in the context of transport. In other words, the goal of sustainable transport needs to express how transport integrates, influences and affects broader social, economic and environmental outcomes.
Another key theme in applying sustainability to transport is the need to recognise the explicit links between transport and land use planning. It has long been accepted that both transport and land use planning are inherently linked and that activities in one area can affect the other. So, for example, the planning of new and existing urban communities needs to take account of the transport infrastructure that supports it. Likewise, the planning of transport infrastructure needs to take account of the needs of the communities it serves.
Accordingly, in applying the concept of sustainability to transport, the work of the (Transport Legislation) review proceeded on the basis of developing an overarching legislative framework based on integrated and sustainable transport."[28]

Vision

The Transport Integration Act framework is headed by a global vision statement which was suggested by stakeholders during the public consultation process which led to the Act. The vision statement provides that "(T) the Parliament recognises the aspirations of Victorians for an integrated and sustainable transport system that contributes to an inclusive, prosperous and environmentally responsible State."[29] The vision has been described as "...an aspirational statement describing how the transport system relates to broader policy outcomes."[30]

Transport system objectives

The route 401 prepaid shuttle from North Melbourne railway station to the University of Melbourne provides an innovative example of transport integration. However, community pressure exists in Melbourne for more permanent improvements to passenger transport including construction of the Melbourne Metro project, a planned metropolitan rail tunnel. The tunnel is proposed to travel from South Kensington railway station (north west of the Melbourne CBD) to Caulfield railway station (in the south east). The proposal was announced in December 2008 as part of the former Victorian State Government's Victorian Transport Plan but is unfunded. Its current status is unclear.

Overview

The transport system objectives in the Transport Integration Act cover the following matters[31] -

  • social and economic inclusion
  • economic prosperity
  • environmental sustainability
  • integration of transport and land use
  • efficiency, coordination and reliability
  • safety and health and wellbeing.

The objectives therefore draw heavily on the key sustainability concepts described above. Agencies must have regard to the objectives when they make decisions or exercise functions which are sourced back to the authority of the Act.

The need for objectives

The objectives essentially describe the outcomes sought to be achieved by the scheme. The need for clear and consistent objectives in policy and legislation settings for transport in Victoria was recognised by both the Transport Legislation Review and the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission (VCEC), the latter as part of its final report on managing transport congestion in Victoria.[32] VCEC observed that -

"The government’s congestion policy priorities need to be supported by clear legislative objectives. If the legislation covering organisations charged with delivering the government’s priorities does not reinforce its policy goals, agencies’ authority to deliver on those goals can be undermined. This is true for most transport policy areas, but particularly so for congestion where the legislation must support a coordinated approach across many agencies if congestion is to be effectively addressed."[33]

VCEC commented on the failure of the previous central Victorian Government transport statute, the Transport Act 1983, to set out clear objectives for the transport system and transport agencies: "...the Act does not include a statement of its purpose or objectives to guide interpretation and decision making. Notwithstanding the absence of express objectives in the Transport Act, this and other Acts state the legislative objectives and functions for the key government agencies involved in transport policy development and service delivery."[34]

VCEC went on to recommend the development of clear and coordinated objectives to apply across the transport portfolio: "(H) having appropriate high level objectives that ‘cascade’ down into related objectives for each agency is a prerequisite for achieving the government’s desired outcomes for the transport sector. Such objectives can encourage agencies to work consistently to achieve these outcomes, and reduce the risk of inconsistent behaviour."[35]

Decision making principles

Overview

The decision making principles in the Transport Integration Act cover the following matters[36] -

Purpose

The decision making principles essentially describe the process elements which must be taken into account by agencies in pursuing the objectives of the scheme and ultimately, the vision for the transport system. For example, a transport decision which has impacts across all tiers of government - local, State and national - should have regard to an integrated decision making process where due regard is had for effects across all three tiers rather than concentrating on only one or two tiers.

Applying the framework

Melbourne Bike Share station on Macarthur St beside a tram line near the Parliament Railway station.

In broad terms, transport agencies and interface agencies caught by the Act must have regard to the objectives and principles when exercising their powers and performing their functions.[37] The framework recognises that many transport system decisions involve competing interests and that decisions are unlikely in many cases to satisfy all parties. This is inherent in the listing of a series of objectives and principles which involve deliberate overlap and tension and which can require careful thought to reconcile. As a result, the Act merely requires that agencies "have regard" to the matters - that is actively consider them - and does not attempt to prescribe particular outcomes in individual cases. In addition, the framework specifically provides that the weight to be given to each objective and principle in the Act is not prescribed by the scheme itself and instead is ultimately a matter to be determined by the relevant agency which is responsible for the decision.[38]

Effect of the framework

The vision statement in the Act is drawn on in the purpose of the Transport Integration Act.[39] The vision statement and transport system objectives are also relevant to the charters and therefore the legal powers of each transport agency established under the Act.

Each transport agency is required to pursue its statutory object consistent with the vision and the objectives.[40] By way of example, if a transport agency is considering establishing a new transport service such as a rail line or bus line and procuring new rolling stock or buses, it must explicitly turn its mind to the matters in Part 2 of the Act as early as the planning stages of such a project. Planning agencies have the same obligations.

Adherence to the Act can generally be pursued through administrative law avenues including merits review[41] in some cases. However, the Act does not create a civil cause of action.[42]

Development of the Act

The underlying policy for the Transport Integration Act was in development for some years before it was presented to the Victorian Parliament as a Bill for scrutiny, debate and passage.

The approach

Why legislation?

Writing about the development of the Transport Integration Act, Pearce and Shepherd noted that -

"Legislation is one of the most powerful tools to implement policy for a number of reasons. It is often the subject of extensive stakeholder engagement; it is ultimately endorsed by cabinet, thereby representing a concluded view of Government on the policy; it is debated publicly in Parliament, offering further opportunities for scrutiny and review of the policy; it is often referred to Parliamentary committees for detailed review; and finally, it is binding and authoritative."[43]

Consistent and coordinated central policy and legislation

The proposal was developed as part of Victoria's Transport Legislation Review,[44] a review of transport policy and legislation across the State. In respect of the place of the measure in the context of a broader suite of policies and regulatory instruments covering the full range of transport activities in the State, Pearce and Shepherd observed that -

"The need for an overarching Act with symbolic and aspirational content was identified early in the (Transport Legislation) review as part of a modular approach. As well as expressing in legislation the broad policy aims of government for transport, this approach sought to more clearly delineate between overarching institutional elements and more detailed regulatory, operational, project and service delivery elements. It also sought to expressly identify linkages within the transport portfolio (road, rail, tram, bus, taxi, hire car, tow trucks) and interfaces with other portfolios (local government authorities and planning authorities)."[45]

Accordingly, the Transport Integration Act was designed as the central policy and statutory instrument for transport in Victoria. It was therefore positioned as something which would not only coordinate and guide the activities of that portfolio but also influence key external influences on transport which were managed outside of the portfolio, particularly in respect of land use activities.

The problem

Train exiting the Melbourne underground loop near Southern Cross Station. The station is serviced by car, bus and tram links.
Southern Cross Station overlooking platforms 6,7,8 (from the right)

In essence, the Transport Integration Act was devised to deal with the problems caused by the inadequate and ageing policy and legislative settings which had bedevilled the Victorian transport portfolio for many years. Pearce and Shepherd observed that it "...was a timely point to commence the review, given it had been 20 years since the State's central transport statute, the Transport Act 1983, was first enacted...".[46] They went on to describe the challenge in more detail -

"...the Transport Act had become the largest statute in Victoria with over 700 pages of dense and prescriptive provisions in accordance with the prevailing legislative style. A number of other transport related Acts (and amendments to the Transport Act) had also been created to respond to different transport policies of successive governments over time. Most of these were examples of either facilitative or coercive legislative approaches. Importantly, however, there was no overarching framework for transport policy reflected in the State's legislation. In other words, transport legislation did not have aspirational elements. More specifically:
  • there was no clear vision for the transport system
  • bodies (such as VicRoads and the Director of Public Transport) were established with different (and potentially competing) objectives
  • there was no overarching framework to express broader policy objectives for transport as a whole
  • the legislation contained minimal reference to social policy objectives and no reference to environmental objectives
  • linkages with related areas (such as planning and local government) were not clear or not recognised."[47]

The process

In 2007, after several years work the Department of Transport released a discussion paper outlining a policy proposal for a new Transport Integration Bill for Victoria. An extensive stakeholder consultation process followed throughout Melbourne and regional Victoria. The Transport Legislation Review: Stakeholder Feedback Summary[48] aimed to reflect the key views held by stakeholders. Released in 2008, it drew on formal submissions as comments made at workshops, forums and briefings during the community engagement program.

The two-year stakeholder and community consultation process informed the development of the Bill proposal, culminating in the release in July 2009 of the Policy Statement Towards an integrated and sustainable transport future: a new legislative framework for transport in Victoria.[49]

Principles-based approach

The policy areas of the Transport Integration Act provide an example of principles-based legislation. This type of legislation relies on broad principles to articulate the outcomes to be achieved by the regulated entities. The Australian Law Reform Commission has described this approach in the following terms -

"Principles-based regulation can be distinguished from rules-based regulation in that it does not necessarily prescribe detailed steps that must be complied with, but rather sets an overall objective that must be achieved. In this way, principles-based regulation seeks to provide an overarching framework that guides and assists regulated entities to develop an appreciation of the core goals of the regulatory scheme. A key advantage of principles-based regulation is its facilitation of regulatory flexibility through the statement of general principles that can be applied to new and changing situations."[50]

Parliamentary approval

Transport Integration Bill

The Act originated as the Transport Integation Bill.[51][52] The Bill was introduced into the lower house of the Victorian Parliament (the Legislative Assembly) on 8 December 2009 by the Hon Lynne Kosky MP, the then Minister for Public Transport. Second reading for the Bill was moved on 10 December 2009.[53]

The Bill was eventually debated and passed by the Legislative Assembly without opposition on 4 February 2010. The Bill was introduced immediately into the upper house of the Victorian Parliament (the Legislative Council) and second reading moved on the same day by the Hon Martin Pakula MLC who had succeeded Lynne Kosky as Minister for Public Transport in the period since the Bill's introduction.[54]

The Transport Integration Bill was ultimately passed without opposition by the Legislative Council on 23 February 2010. The Bill then received the Royal Assent to become an Act on 2 March 2010.[55]

The Transport Integration Act was subsequently proclaimed to commence on 1 July 2010.[56]

Ports Integration Bill

The "port corporations", the Port of Melbourne Corporation, the Port of Hastings Corporation and the Victorian Regional Channels Authority were originally not included in the Bill proposal and were added later to the Transport Integration Act scheme by the Transport Legislation Amendment (Ports Integration) Bill 2010 (the Ports Integration Bill).[57]

The Ports Integration Bill merged the Port of Melbourne Corporation and the Port of Hastings Corporation under a rebadged Port of Melbourne Corporation banner. The Ports Integration Bill was proclaimed to commence on 1 September 2010.[58] This formally brought the Port of Melbourne Corporation and the Victorian Regional Channels Authority within the Transport Integration Act framework on that date.

The merger of the Port of Melbourne Corporation and the Port of Hastings Corporation has been reversed - see changes to the Act below.

Major amendments to the Transport Integration Act

A number of significant amendments have already been made to the Transport Integration Act:

Climate Change Act

The Climate Change Act 2010 amended the Transport Integration Act to amend the environmental sustainability objective in the transport system objectives of the Transport Integration Act.[59] The amendment changed that objective by providing that the transport system should actively contribute to the reduction of the overall contribution of transport-related greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, the change require relevant agencies to have regard to preparing for and adapting to the challenges presented by climate change.[60]

The Climate Change Act was passed on 3 September 2010, received royal assent on 14 September 2010[61] and commenced on 1 July 2011.

Taxis and trams in Melbourne. Taxis are as vital to the public transport mix of Melbourne as the city's iconic trams.

Taxi industry reform

The Transport Legislation Amendment (Taxi Services Reform and Other Matters) Act 2011 amended the Transport Integration Act to create the Taxi Services Commission. The Commission was created as an inquiry body in first instance charged with conducting the Taxi Industry Inquiry, a major inquiry into the taxi industry and taxi services in Victoria, and then to become the ongoing taxi industry regulator in place of the current regulator, the Director of Public Transport and the Victorian Taxi Directorate.

Public Transport Victoria

The Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Authority) Act 2011 amended the Transport Integration Act to establish the Public Transport Development Authority, trading as Public Transport Victoria, and to make other related changes. The legislation partially commenced on 15 December 2011.[62] Further parts of the amending legislation will be proclaimed in the future to provide for the full establishment of the PTDA and to abolish the agencies it replaces - the Director of Public Transport, the Transport Ticketing Authority and MetLink.

Port of Hastings Development Authority Act

The Transport Legislation (Port of Hastings Development Authority) Act 2011 amended the Transport Integration Act to reverse the merger of the Port of Melbourne Corporation and the Port of Hastings Corporation, which occurred in September 2010, and to establish a Port of Hastings Development Authority to oversee the development of the Port of Hastings as a competitor in container trade to the Port of Melbourne. The legislation was passed on 16 August 2011,[63] and came into force on 1 January 2012.[64]

Comparison with other jurisdictions

V/Line operated 'Sprinter' railcar at North Shore in Geelong in regional Victoria.

Nicholas Low has observed that the transport policy directions of both Victoria and New South Wales have pursued "integration" from the start of the 21st century, particularly integrated planning for the various modes of transport and the integration of transport and land use planning.[65] However, Victoria went further and remains alone among Australian jurisdictions in presenting these general policy directions to full Parliamentary scrutiny and entrenching them in legislative form. Low comments that the Act "...provides strong legislative support for the development of an integrated and sustainable transport system...".[66]

The Commonwealth Department of Infrastructure and Transport has commented that -

"Victoria has progressively modernised its transport legislation. The Transport Integration Act 2010, the new principal transport statute, sets out a vision, objectives and principles for transport, making it clear that the transport system needs to be integrated and sustainable. The Act requires transport agencies and other decision makers to have regard to broader social, economic and environmental considerations. It unites all elements of the transport portfolio to ensure that transport agencies work towards a common goal of an integrated transport system. It integrates land use and transport planning and decision making by extending the framework to land-use agencies whose decisions can significantly affect transport, including the government's planning functions, municipal councils, the Growth Area Authority and Parks Victoria".[67]

In addition, the Commonwealth Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency noted that the Transport Integration Act appeared to be the only Australian transport statute which explicitly recognised the risks posed by climate change.[68]

Reports continue to call for the adoption of policy and statutes which recognise emphasis on Transport Integration Act objectives including sustainability. "Moving Australia 2030", a report generated by the Moving People 2030 Taskforce in March 2013 which included representation from planning, public transport, bus and rail lobby groups, is the latest of these documents. The report instances the Act as a case study for driving integrated decision making in transport, land use planning and sustainability and as a model to be followed by other jurisdictions in Australia.[69]

Despite these observations, other jurisdictions including the Commonwealth have yet to respond to Victoria's leadership towards greater integration and sustainability in transport systems and their regulation. In fact, concerns exist that national developments are moving away from integrated transport solutions towards greater silo based activity as shown by the establishment of distinct sole purpose national regulators for heavy vehicles, rail and maritime.[70]

In the words of Norman Swann, "(T) the challenge is to apply this new thinking into outcomes for the State - and nationally."[71]

See also

References

  1. ^ Official version of the Act available at the Victorian Government legislation web site
  2. ^ Official version of the Act. This Act was renamed by the Transport Integration Act. It is now titled the Transport (Compliance and Miscellaneous) Act 1983
  3. ^ See section 1 of the Act.
  4. ^ David Withington, The Transport Integration Act: a major change for the transport portfolio, but why should planners take notice?, Planning News, Volume 37, No. 10, November 2011, page 16.
  5. ^ See Part 2 of the Act.
  6. ^ See Parts 3 and 5 - 7.
  7. ^ David Withington, The Transport Integration Act: a major change for the transport portfolio, but why should planners take notice?, Planning News, Volume 37, No. 10, November 2011, page 16.
  8. ^ See Part 4 of the Act. The Act initially adopted the Brumby Government's Victorian Transport Plan as the first plan. However, the defeat of that Government and the subsequent abandonment the Victorian Transport Plan led to the requirement being made generic by amendments made by the Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Authority) Act 2011. The change commenced on 15 December 2011.
  9. ^ See section 64.
  10. ^ David Withington, The Transport Integration Act: a major change for the transport portfolio, but why should planners take notice?, Planning News, Volume 37, No. 10, November 2011, page 16.
  11. ^ See definition of "transport system" in section 3.
  12. ^ See the definition of "transport system" in section 3, in particular paragraph (a).
  13. ^ Note, some shipping matters are controlled by the Commonwealth under legislation such as the Navigation Act 1912. Other matters are within the jurisdiction of States such as Victoria through Acts such as the Transport Integration Act and other statutes like the Marine Act 1988.
  14. ^ Note, many air transport regulation matters are controlled by the Commonwealth Government. The Transport Integration Act would apply, for example, to planning controls at some airports and in respect of transport connections to other airports by road and rail.
  15. ^ See the definition of "transport system" in section 3, in particular paragraphs (b), (c) and (d).
  16. ^ Robert Pearce and Ian Shepherd, The Transport Integration Act 2010: driving integrated and sustainable transport outcomes through legislation, Urban Transport XVII, WIT Press 2011, page 361.
  17. ^ See definition of "interface body" in section 2 of the Act. The broad definition of the "transport system" in section 3 is equally relevant to the activities of these agencies. See also section 25 of the Act regarding its application to interface bodies.
  18. ^ David Withington, The Transport Integration Act: a major change for the transport portfolio, but why should planners take notice?, Planning News, Volume 37, No. 10, November 2011, page 17.
  19. ^ See definition of "transport legislation" in section 3.
  20. ^ See definition of "interface legislation" in section 3.
  21. ^ This agency was added on 28 October 2010 by Order made under the Act.
  22. ^ See, for example, section 67 (1)(e) of the Act which provides that the Director of Public Transport has as one of his or her functions the "...entering and managing contracts for passenger services and other ancillary or incidental transport services..." (paragraph (i)).
  23. ^ See section 25.
  24. ^ See Part 4.
  25. ^ Robert Pearce and Ian Shepherd, The Transport Integration Act 2010: driving integrated and sustainable transport outcomes through legislation, Urban Transport XVII, WIT Press 2011, page 357.
  26. ^ Robert Pearce and Ian Shepherd, The Transport Integration Act 2010: driving integrated and sustainable transport outcomes through legislation, Urban Transport XVII, WIT Press 2011, page 358
  27. ^ Robert Pearce and Ian Shepherd, The Transport Integration Act 2010: driving integrated and sustainable transport outcomes through legislation, Urban Transport XVII, WIT Press 2011, page 358.
  28. ^ Robert Pearce and Ian Shepherd, The Transport Integration Act 2010: driving integrated and sustainable transport outcomes through legislation, Urban Transport XVII, WIT Press 2011, page 358-9.
  29. ^ Section 6.
  30. ^ Robert Pearce and Ian Shepherd, The Transport Integration Act 2010: driving integrated and sustainable transport outcomes through legislation, Urban Transport XVII, WIT Press 2011, page 361.
  31. ^ In sections 8-13.
  32. ^ Making the right choices: Options for managing transport congestion - Final Report September 2006 - Victorian Government 2006.
  33. ^ Making the right choices: Options for managing transport congestion - Final Report September 2006 - Victorian Government 2006 - page 101.
  34. ^ Making the right choices: Options for managing transport congestion - Final Report September 2006 - Victorian Government 2006 - page 101.
  35. ^ Making the right choices: Options for managing transport congestion - Final Report September 2006 - Victorian Government 2006 - page 386.
  36. ^ In sections 15-21.
  37. ^ See sections 24 and 25.
  38. ^ See sections 26 and 27.
  39. ^ See section 1.
  40. ^ For example, see section 137 which contains the primary object of the Linking Melbourne Authority.
  41. ^ Link to Administrative Review Council summary of "merits review" - http://www.ag.gov.au/agd/WWW/arcHome.nsf/Page/FAQS#a6
  42. ^ Transport Integration Act 2010, section 28.
  43. ^ Robert Pearce and Ian Shepherd, The Transport Integration Act 2010: driving integrated and sustainable transport outcomes through legislation, Urban Transport XVII, WIT Press 2011, page 356.
  44. ^ Information on the Department of Transport website about the Transport Legislation review
  45. ^ Robert Pearce and Ian Shepherd, The Transport Integration Act 2010: driving integrated and sustainable transport outcomes through legislation, Urban Transport XVII, WIT Press 2011, page 357.
  46. ^ Robert Pearce and Ian Shepherd, The Transport Integration Act 2010: driving integrated and sustainable transport outcomes through legislation, Urban Transport XVII, WIT Press 2011, page 356.
  47. ^ Robert Pearce and Ian Shepherd, The Transport Integration Act 2010: driving integrated and sustainable transport outcomes through legislation, Urban Transport XVII, WIT Press 2011, page 356.
  48. ^ An online copy of this document is available at the Department of Transport website
  49. ^ An online copy of this document is available at the Department of Transport website
  50. ^ For Your Information: Australian Privacy Law and Practice (ALRC Report 108), Australian Law Reform Commission, May 2008, Vol 1, section 4.5.
  51. ^ Official version of the Bill available at the Victorian Government legislation web site - Introduction print of the Transport Integration Bill
  52. ^ Official version of the explanatory memorandum for the Bill available at the Victorian Government legislation web site - Explanatory memorandum for the Transport Integration Bill
  53. ^ Victorian Parliament, Legislative Assembly, Hansard, 10 December 2009 - Second reading speech extract
  54. ^ Victorian Parliament, Legislative Council, Hansard, 4 February 2010
  55. ^ See endnotes, Transport Integration Act 2010.
  56. ^ Victoria Government Gazette, Special Gazette (no. 256), 30 June 2010, page 1.
  57. ^ Official version of the Bill available at the Victorian Government legislation web site
  58. ^ Victoria Government Gazette, Special Gazette (no. 337), 24 August 2010, page 1
  59. ^ Section 10.
  60. ^ Section 73, Climate Change Act 2010.
  61. ^ Victorian Official version of the Bill and Act including passage and commencement information available at the Victorian Government legislation web site - Legislation and Parliamentary Documents
  62. ^ See www.legislation.vic.gov.au.
  63. ^ See the status of Bill at www.legislation.vic.gov.au.
  64. ^ See Transport Legislation (Port of Hastings Development Authority) Act 2011, section 2.
  65. ^ Nicholas Low, Australian Cities, Transport Integration and the Global Dilemma of Mobility, State of Australian Cities, 5th SOAC Conference, 30 November 2011, page 1.
  66. ^ Nicholas Low, "Australian Cities, Transport Integration and the Global Dilemma of Mobility, State of Australian Cities, 5th SOAC Conference, 30 November 2011, page 5.
  67. ^ State of Australian Cities 2011, Major Cities Unit, Department of Infrastructure and Transport 2011, page 214.
  68. ^ Maddocks, The Role of Regulation in Facilitating or Constraining Adaption to Climate Change for Australian Infrastructure, Report for the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Australian Government, released 20 January 2012.
  69. ^ "Moving Australia 2030", Moving People 2030 Taskforce, March 2013, page 103.
  70. ^ 2013 has seen the creation of a National Heavy Vehicle Regulator, a National Rail Safety Regulator and further maritime industry regulatory centralisation in the Australian Maritime Safety Authority.
  71. ^ Norman Swann, Why is it so difficult to have policy based on evidence rather than belief?, The Economics of Transport - Smarter Transport - Better Cities, Metropolitan Transport Forum, GAMUT, Melbourne, Australia, March 2011, page 13.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transport_Integration_Act_2010&oldid=719074302"