User:Aeon1006/Archive-Delta

Userbox Problem

Uh, hi, when I hopped onto my User page, for three Userboxes in the cars catagory, this happened(Minus the actual userboxes).

And they have your user name on them. Can you tell me what's wrong with these userboxes? Thank you. --ASDFGHJKL 14:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! --ASDFGHJKL 19:08, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

GUS moves

Hi Aeon1006,

I just noticed your GUS "moves" really aren't. Take a look at this example. First, move the page to your area. Then, replace the redirect code with {{User GUS UBX to}}. If you have any nuts-and-bolts questions, let me know (I've done it a few times myself ). Rfrisbie^talk 22:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

You said...Ooops, ok I will move then instead of replacing them from here on out. Well still the end result was the same. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 22:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Not quite, the history and talk pages aren't transferred that way. You might want to ask an admin for help deleting the pages for some re-dos. Rfrisbie^talk 22:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

You said... Ah I see, I about forgot that part ok thanks for pointing that out page histories need to go over to hence move not replace. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 22:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Have you seen Category:Wikipedia GUS userboxes? I expect Xaosflux or Cyde would be willing to help get these boxes back on track. Rfrisbie^talk 22:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

You said... Thanks! I will start the process. Thanks again for the help Æon ^{Insane Ward} 00:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Cool.

Rfrisbie^talk 00:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you...

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

For all that you do, I award you, Aeon, the Tireless Contributor Barnstar. Michael 05:23, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Why?

Why did you change the Chevrolet Corvette C6 userbox? Just wondering, nothing else. Cheers! ←T•h•e R.S.J.→ 20:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Cheers! ←T•h•e R.S.J.→ 14:52, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Advocacy request

Heyo, Steve Caruso here. There is a Request for assistance by iantresman (talk) on Wolf effect and Timeline of cosmology. Would you be willing to take their case? If you will, please leave a note and sign under the entry on WP:AMARQ and change "(pending)" in the heading to "(open)." When you're finished with the case, set it to "(closed)". If you're not able to take the case, please leave me a message on my talk page so I can continue searching for a willing Advocate. Many thanks! אמר Steve Caruso _(desk/AMA) 13:14, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Acknowledgement by Ian Tresman

Thanks for considering the case. I think it is best summarised in my description on own talk page (See AMA Request). Note that I tend to write lesser-known information, often considered controversial, or even fringe. But I am considerate of NPOV and reliable sources.

The main problem, as I see it, is a double standard between our editing approach. I feel I am quite careful to back-up the majority of my edit contributions with peer-reviewed citations (or reliable sources). ScienceApologist, on the other hand, will often judge the contributions, often without presenting citations, and if necessary, resorting to "non notability" and "undue weight" -- subjective criteria.

And when editing articles on controversial subjects, I feel that ScienceApologist is quite ready to add material without citations, or from non-Reliable sources, and non-notability and undue weight appear to be forgotten.

I have many many examples. --Iantresman 20:55, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Userpage

I heard that you customize userpages. Could you make one for me, please? I like blue. --Anna, but --19:56, 24 August 2006 (UTC) (she messed up her signature)

No. Cute 1 4 u is my sister's friend and Bethicalyna2 is my sister. I could just copy off Lindsay's --Anna 20:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

I didn't want or need the reason becuase I know. Thank you and happy regards editing. Anna Talk to Anna! (Using my IP)

Esperanza Front Page design

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		You have served Wikipedia, especially Esperanza, in several different ways, especially in the front page design you created. Great job, Aeon!!! Ed^{talk c E} 23:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Think about it this way: you're not obligated to work here, you're not obligated to help Esperanza. Anyone that edits Wikipedia makes a big sacrifice of their time.--Ed^{talk c E} 00:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

You're welcome. Michael 01:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

You deserve this...

		Esperanza Barnstar
		After all the work you've done for Esperanza, especially all your work on the new main page, it is my pleasure to give you this. Congratulations! Th ε Halo ^Θ 00:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

It's a long job that needs doing, and you did it, so, trust me, you really have earned the star :) Th ε Halo ^Θ 00:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award

Aeon1006, thanks for signing up for the Esperanza User Page Contest. The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done.

Please drop by the contest page for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! May the Force be with you! Shr e shth91 ($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 15:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Possible S-man sock

Hi. I'm not the right person to report this to. Please could you report it on WP:AN/I, if you are concerned about it. -- The Anome 20:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Take a look!

Nice work, Aeon, it looks very nice. Make sure to post something about at the Front Page Redesign so that you can get more comments. One thing, some of the links for the programs (either the images or the links) still seem to link to some of the architecture-related things. And you can probably take out the "What are Portals? | List of portals | Featured Portals" section at the bottom, since even though the design is based off a portal design, Esperanza isn't a portal. And for the images on the programs, let me know if there's any that you don't think are perfect, and I'll see if I can find something that looks most Esperanzial. Thanks for working so hard on this! -- Nataly a 03:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

...and green is good ;). NoSeptember 20:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Let me start off by saying you've done a great job! I've added some of my content to your sandbox. I'm thinking there will probably be a few more bullet points to "What Esperanza is not." I've been talking to a few people off-wiki, and a couple of them felt the shades of green at the moment are a little too dark, and that they'd like to see it be a little lighter and brighter. Maybe you can tweak the shades a bit. I think we should continue with the small tweaks for a couple days, and then once we feel we have a near-completed product and need more feedback, we can link to it at WT:ESP and get more widespread comments from the entire community. Cheers, EWS23 (Leave me a message!) 22:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Looks good, but could you consider adding the shortened EA logo to that blank space?--Ed^{talk c E} 15:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry I didn't make myself clear. The page has problems now. Could you use

--Ed^{talk c E} 16:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Very nice work. I think I might go with a green talkpage now (my userpage has already been taken over).
A passing thought: what about #CCFFCC for background colour instead of palegreen? It's a tad lighter and not quite so hard on the eyes.— Editor at Large ( talk) 20:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

— Editor at Large ( talk) 23:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award

Aeon1006, thanks for signing up for the Esperanza User Page Contest. The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done.

Please drop by the contest page for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! May the Force be with you! Shr e shth91 ($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 15:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Possible S-man sock

Hi. I'm not the right person to report this to. Please could you report it on WP:AN/I, if you are concerned about it. -- The Anome 20:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Image Please!

Hi Aeon, I was wondering if you could create an header image (much like the way yours is done), that is predomiantly red. Also, can you make my talk page like my page & get rid of the overlap around the Signpost. Thanks, Jorcoga^ETC. 08:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Surprise me, but add some black too. I give you full permission to do the other stuff ASAP. Jorcoga ^ETC. 10:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I almost forgot. Add an I'm in/out notifier to my page. I'll be back on Tuesday, if I'm lucky. Jorcoga ^ETC. 09:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Moving userboxes

Hi, I noticed you've been moving a lot of userboxes into your userspace could you do some manual user page editing which the bots haven't picked up so they can be deleted? Just go here and find some boxes that only has a small What links here list and reduce it to 1/2. Thanks.--Andeh 20:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Love the userboxes Mathiastck 18:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For deleting such a large amount of vandalism, I award you, Aeon, the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Keep up the good work. Michael 06:27, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar, I'm glad to help where I can. Cheers Canadian-Bacon ^(contribs) 03:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Sticks

I've gradually evolved from manual edits to factory made sticks. :) Thanks very much, and I'll work to keep up a good standard. Luna Santin 03:43, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Message received

Hello, I received your message about your advocate status for User:Iantresman. --ScienceApologist 01:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Ian is a good contributor who has a slight problem in that he views Wikipedia as a forum that can aid in the promulgation and visibility of ideas opposed to the scientific mainstream (see What Wikipedia is not). While Wikipedia certainly should have articles that describe ideas which are outside of the scientific mainstream as per Wikipedia's Neutral Point-of-View policy, Ian takes this as an opportunity to insert fringe perspectives as fact into Wikipedia. Specifically, Ian advocates for compromising the factual accuracy and editorial integrity of articles towards a skewed perspective where non-standard cosmologies and catastrophism idealizations are described as notable controversies in fields where they generally ignored or dismissed outright. Ian has a tendency to hide behind a few policies (including verifiability) claiming that since the "standard is verifiability and not truth" that articles should conform to his perspective rather than one that doesn't compromise the accuracy and integrity of the subject material at hand. This has resulted in the past with protracted circular discussions that have left some contributors, including myself, disgusted with the utter tendentious nature of the arguments. --ScienceApologist 11:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

CVU

Wow. That's a bit ridiculous. =) alphaChimp ^laudare 01:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

CVU Page

Hey I saw it up for deletion earlier today, funny stuff eh? Unless you meant something else by that talk message and I'm very clueless. Canadian-Bacon ^(contribs) 04:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh it's back up for deletion again, what is this? Thanks for letting me know. Canadian-Bacon ^(contribs) 04:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

AMA Help

Thanks for taking the time to investigate my AMA request with ScienceApologist. I appreciate your suggestion of mediation with him, but we've been through it before, and I'm not convinced of its effectiveness.

I saw ScienceApologist reply. He is quite right that I like to describe "ideas opposed to the scientific mainstream", but he is wrong to suggest that this has anything to do with "What Wikipedia is not)". Wikipedia is quite inclusive.

I also note that ScienceApologist suggests that I try to include fringe ideas as fact... this is utter garbage, and am well aware of mispresentation, and will provide verifiable citations as needed.

As for "hiding behind policy", I think this is another way of acknowledging that I abide by policy.

Thanks again for your time Aeon. --Iantresman 21:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

%%%%

Yes thanks, I've tried both Article RfC, Third Opinion and Arbitration. I think that one of the problems is that describing fringe material will always be in the minority, and most editors are not necessarily sympathetic. A good example is the Wolf Effect, described as a "new redshift mechanism", but you'd never know by reading the article on Redshift because most astronomers have never heard of it... yet it isn't an article on "astronomical" redshift. --Iantresman 22:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

%%%%

You can find our previous Mediation Cabal session here.
And my previous Arbitration case is here

To summarise, I feel that ScienceApologist is misrepresenting minority views, by personally judging that they are not notable, or worse, pseudoscientific. The result is that certain articles on science, unlike most other articles, lack nearly any criticism, or "non-mainstream" views. For example, the article on Redshift has next to nothing on alternative views, despite extensive peer reviewed citations. --Iantresman 17:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

%%%%%

I've started a few requests for comments. While it can be argued that the rightful consensus is achieved, I am not sure that is correct if it is at the expense of NPOV's first statement: "all articles must be written from a neutral point of view, that is, they must represent all significant views fairly and without bias"[1] (My emphasis)

RfC: Redshift | Tired Light | Galaxy rotation problem --Iantresman 18:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Suspected Vandal of Sorts.

Aeon, I have a slight hunch that a local politician may have attempted to use Wikipedia for his own political gain. I know this isn't exactly vandalism, but I am unfamiliar with the protocol in place for this situation. The user in question is Stampedem. The contributions in question have to do with the Eliot Shapleigh, and Dee Margo articles. These two men are both candidates for a seat in the Texas Senate, and as you can imagine, this sort of conduct has arrisen. I reverted some of the changes this user made too the Shapleigh article, and am currently researching the portions of his/her contributions I did not revert. I will document my findings on any other revert on the article's talk page. I also left a message on their talk page on the topic. Getting to the Margo article, what raises concern is that not all the contents of the article are exactly true. I have already tagged the article with {{Unreferenced}} and {{Not verified}}, and will be going through it over the next couple of days to check the facts. Also, although the author attacked the Shapleigh article with a sort of smear-campaign-style contribution, only a sentence of the Margo article deals with the upcoming election. In all honesty, Margo is somewhat of an unnotable person--although accomplished, his most notable quality is that he is running for a position as Texas senator. Hence, I also marked the article with {{Importance}}. I need to know how to attain the IP of a user, that way, I may run a trace to see if this user is indeed who I think they are. Please, if you have a moment, look into this situation. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Somnabot 22:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Just an update: I am having considerable difficulties figuring out how to deal with this problem. Any adition to the article seems to soon be reverted by the user mentioned above. Somnabot 05:52, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Query about RfC

Greetings; I was wondering how one goes about getting a conduct RfC going. I'm writing you because of a recent AfD vote on Danny Yee, in which you agreed that the nomination (by User:Kmaguir1 was in bad faith. On bell hooks, you'll know that (1) editors have tried to work with User:Kmaguir1, but (2) he doesn't know how to play well with others. Evidence for (1): I took one of his paragraphs and revised part of it in a NPOV and kept it in the article, rather than simply blanket removing his changes. I also improved his criticism section at Judith Butler. All well and good. But meanwhile, (2), he continues to insert the same criticism paragraph on bell hooks day after day, despite the fact that he has gotten no consensus for it, various editors delete it on sight, and the first third of it is completely redundant, since the version I edited is in the article. So, we have someone who repeatedly ignores WP:CONSENSUS. I think many editors agree that this user is disruptive. My question is whether an RfC is appropriate in such a case, or whether there is another avenue. I've been editing for about six months, but I haven't run into much of this before. Thanks for any pointers.--Anthony Krupp 13:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

re: Need to run something by you.

Have either of the disputants provided links to the formal Mediation and Arbitration cases? I'd think it would be wise of us to look over them both in detail. :-) אמר Steve Caruso _(desk/AMA) 15:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Message for Aeon

Hey man. Listen, I know you're probably upset that the CVU was deleted. But ultimately, it was the right thing to do. It was not the easy thing to do, and it was not the popular thing to do. But it was the right thing to do. And I hope you will understand that someday. Until then, I wish you peace and love, and please keep up the good fight against vandalism. At the end of the day, we're on the same team.

~~Dr Chatterjee 21:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)~~

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |rowspan="2" valign="top" | |rowspan="2" | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | The Resilient Barnstar |- |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I, Dr. Chatterjee, hereby award this barnstar to Aeon1006 for his grace under pressure, reasonable discussion, and good sportsmanship during the debate over the CVU's deletion. Aeon is a credit to Wikipedia, and I look forward to working with him in the near future. Dr Chatterjee 00:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC) |}

Defcom

Ok, it should work now. I have no idea what happened. Yank sox 15:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Doc moved it per GUS, and said someone could adopt it. So, I figured what the hay. Yank sox 15:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to need help in fixing all the links, do you think you can help out? The Wiki programming is acting funny for me right now. The descriptions page is also acting wacky. Yank sox 15:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm, you may be right. I've almost solved all of it, just need to userfy most of it. Yank sox 15:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I was going to use AWB to fix the links. Do you want me not to do that? Yank sox 15:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not going to do anything right now considering this is contested, Doc really needs to weigh in. Yank sox 16:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Un-Esperanzian colour

It is? Why wasn't I informed? In my opinion, in those large quantities, it's really garish and off-putting, not something we want for our main page. Thanks and regards, —Cel es tianpower ^háblame 17:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

AMA information

Vicente Vicente and 68.250.184.204 appear to be the same person, as demonstrated here. Each has vandalised the alumni list for Ohio State mercilessly. The comments included on the history page suggest that most of the vandalism is attributable to one person. Rkevins82 20:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Paleoconservatism Dispute

I repeatedly said that if anyone has a legitimate concerns that they raise the issues here on a case-by-case basis. Psychohistorian refused. He demands verification for facts that no one seriously questions. Also:

He claims an article is "unsorced" that already has over 100+ ref tags. The George W. Bush page, the most disputed page here, only has 54 or so cites. The accuser refuses serious discussion, other than to demand MORE citations.
He insists that I personally provide "countless citations," which is not humanly possible, or let him delete large swatches of text. Then he trolls this site seeking admins to help him with the above.
His views on citation are so extreme that even if a fact is sourced, but the source page is taken down, he claims it is therefore unsourced and presumed unverifiable. Yakuman 22:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I must ask you not to participate in any issues concerning me, due to a conflict of interest. I just discovered that you are part of something called a "cabal." I explained on my talk page why I believe this group lacks civility, good faith and credibility.
1.) People associated with this group recently blitzed me with threats and spurious accusations. My talk page tells the story. Not only was I browbeaten for what I did not do, I was permitted no reasonable defense. I do not wish to risk repeating this situation.
2.) Also, a "cabal" is the online equivalent of a star chamber. You may claim that the name is merely a joke, but my point stands.
3.) Nothing here should be interpreted as denying PH his rights. I simply ask that this "cabal" leave me alone. If he wants to find an "advocate" outside of this group, I'm willing to communicate with that person. My concerns here have nothing to do with him or the article under discussion. Yakuman 05:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)(cc to my talk page)

Jorcoga again

Hi Aeon, I've noticed you haven't been replying to my posts. By now, the answers to your questions have been archived, so I'll tell you again that I want a banner with black & red. Have a good break. Jorcoga 11:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Also, I wanted my talk page to look like my userpage. Jorcoga 23:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

My user page

I'm rather ambivalent towards the CVU, as a matter of fact, I don't really mind if it gets deleted. But, having bad admins like drini running around who couldn't care less about policy is a terrible thing for Wikipedia. So, we need to remove Drini. ShortJason 20:38, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Assign Me

I have the Vincent one, but I suspect that I'll be closing that in two days from a lack of responses to my messages. (on IP, usertalk, and anon page) --\/\/slack (talk) 01:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello Aeon

Hey, I don't think that second one re: the music site will require much advocacy, but the other one re: "the third holiest site in Islam" probably will. I've responded to both, clearing the request log at this moment.--Amerique 03:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

AMA Alert

I'm going to be Bold and change the AMA alert to "Please close completed cases on the Requests page. Also, I'm adding the AMA Metting page to the template. Feel free to revert. --\/\/slack (talk) 16:40, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Actually...

I wouldn't mind, and would actually be pretty grateful, if you were to say something in my defense on the CVU MfD. I feel I was unfairly targetted by someone trying to bait me into a flame war, and punished along with that user when the flame war erupted (and even in the midst of said flame war, I think I showed a pretty ridiculously high amount of restraint). The fact that I was lumped into the same boat as the guy who was harassing me still isn't sitting well with me. Up to you, of course, but if you could throw a kind word of support my way, I'd really appreciate it. Dr Chatterjee 04:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from Alphachimp

Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent RfA, which was successful with a an overwhelmingly flattering and deeply humbling total of 138/2/2 (putting me #10 on the RfA WP:100). I guess infinite monkey theorem has been officially proven. Chimps really can get somewhere on Wikipedia.

With new buttons come great responsibility, and I'll try my best to live up to your expectations. If you need assistance with something, don't hesitate to swing by my talk page or email me (trust me, I do respond :)). The same goes for any complaints or comments in regard to my administrative actions. Remember, I'm here for you.

(Thanks go to Blnguyen for the incredible photo to the right.) alphaChimp ^laudare 05:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks so much for everything. Hang in there buddy. Don't hesitate to swing by if you need anything. (And you have, and I appreciate it.) alphaChimp ^laudare 05:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

haha. The wikibreak and me sucking at HTML weren't a good combination. alphaChimp ^laudare 05:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

leaving

Unfortunately, I must go now. Thanks for being a good friend.=(--Ed^{talk c E} 23:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

OMG! He's leaving! he's a great editor. i'm trying to find out why. --Christy06 21:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

CVU

If you are referring to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit (third nomination), I'm too POV (and have voted) to close that one, besides it getting relsited from DRV for improper closure during the last nomination. From a brief review of the discussion it appears to be bordering between Keep and No-consensus-Keep right now anyway. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:23, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Oh wow, I love it :). Thanks! alphaChimp^(talk) 02:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

White People

revert the vandal's edit, NOT MINE. and don't put warnings on my talk page Desertsky85451 03:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I should have assumed good faith > I'm in a snippy mood. Currently trapped at work due to a monsoon outside, and its 8:20pm here. I want to go home, but I can't, so I'm stuck fighting retarded teenage wiki vandals when there is cold beer in my fridge 5 miles from here. Keep up the good wikipedia-ing. Desertsky85451 03:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. -- Gogo Dodo 03:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the Purple Barnstar! =) I'm honored. I seemed to have picked up a groupie vandal. Oh, well. =) -- Gogo Dodo 07:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Somnabot has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding, {{subst:User:Cowman109/Smile2}} or {{subst:User:Cowman109/Smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Thanks for all your help in dealing with Stampedem. Somnabot 20:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for routing my request to AN/I! --Matt 00:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

And thanks for your followthrough. I appreciate it! --Matt 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

User making legal threats

He withdrew the threats. You may wish to reopen the mediation. JoshuaZ 01:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award

Greetings, Aeon1006. The judges would like to announce that the winner for the Esperanza User Page Contest has been chosen. Congratulations to Misza13 for winning the contest. The winning entry can be found here.

If you'd like to participate in the contest again, check by the contest page in a few days and sign up. See you around. May the Force be with you! Shr e shth91 ($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 09:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Roots..

When glancing at the Mediation cabal page I noticed that you're dealing with this case. Please note that as discussed on my talk page some of the edits Miller complains of were made by me rather than Laurence Boyce, who last edited the page on 11:27, 3 August 2006. The complaint appears to me to be ill founded. ..dave souza, talk 19:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Guess the list on Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal could do with an update :) ...dave souza, talk 19:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Purple Barnstar

Yet another thank-you

Appreciate the star! It's the only "payment" we get here ... and I'm always happy to help keep people's user pages clean of nastiness. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 20:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Jorcoga (Not Again!!!)

Hi Aeon, I noticed you got rid of the "I'm busy" tag so I thought i would take the chance to say hi & ask how my picture is going.So, here goes: Hi. How's my picture going? Hope to get a reply soon, Jorcoga 11:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC).

Yay for me!

Yay for me! User page vandalism is bad!--Andeh 12:16, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Luna

Psst... [2] Luna is a guy :) --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 12:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

No prob! P.S. I borrowed your header links for my user page --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 03:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

It's Great!

I love it! Jorcoga 00:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

The latest User Page Contest

Hi Aeon1006 and thanks for signing up as a judge for this round of the contest! You'll have three user pages to examine. The user pages you get coincide with your signup number. So if you signed up to be a judge in spot 1 than you will get nominations 1-3. Pick your favorite one, and list it in the finalist section. After all 5 judges have chosen a finalist it's time to award them 1-10 points in the four categories:

Attractiveness: general layout, considering colour scheme and/or use of tables if applicable
Usefulness: links to subpages or editing aids, helpful information
Interesting-ness: quirky, unique, captivating, or funny content
General niceness: at the judges' discretion

Please see the Scores section on this page for additional information on your job as a judge.

Keep in mind that your scores are confidential! Email Celestianpower with your scores and final choices. As soon as all the scores have been tallied, the winner will be announced! Thanks.

Wikiwoohoo 21:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Cute 1 4 u

I saw the situation at her page. I would just like to remind you that she isn't in violation of WP:CHILD yet. It is in development.--Ed^{talk c E} 21:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I know, but you accused her of violating an indevelopment policy. I'm not against you or anything that's happening to her. It's just that I hate it when people like to overdo the "prosecuting". Think of this like the US Justice System. You can't accuse a criminal for a law that doesn't exist yet. --Ed^{talk c E} 22:01, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Yea, you know what? I'm having second thoughts about her being here in Wikipedia. Do you think we should ostracize her IP? (I like to use my vocabulary very often now=)!)--Ed^{talk c E} 22:28, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Whole Stack of Em

Here [3] Morton devonshire 22:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

hi

You're talking aboutr me being a sockpuppet or something but I don't know what you're talking about. I'm not impersonating New York...am I? I'm just a fan so you need to know that...I guess. --New York from Flavor of Love 03:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Yea. okay.-New York from Flavor of Love 03:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

How long are you gonna check me? --New York from Flavor of Love 03:31, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Okay. thanks. --New York from Flavor of Love 03:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Cute 1 4 u

Based on this diff, I can assuredly say that New York from Flavor of Love user is Cute 1 4 u. Right IP range for her area, and the usual "Oh, I'm going to hide things by removing it and I don't know about page histories." Ryūlóng 06:09, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Actally, I knew it was on the history! --75.34.12.156 23:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

???

I can't believe so many things can happen on one night! Don't worry, I'll keep a close eye on her. By the way, what exactly is a Dynamic IP?--Ed^{talk c E} 12:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

One More Thing...

How do you get the "ONLINE" thing on my page. I'd like it on my page so people could know when I'm on. Cheers! The RSJ - ^SPEAK 03:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

___

Are you there? I have something important to tell you. --75.33.230.133 02:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

She responded on ANI--Ed^{talk c E} 02:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

That's what i was gonna say.--75.33.230.133 02:22, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Where? I do see a message? Maybe you have the wrong person. What's the username? --75.33.230.133 02:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm talkin' about who did you check user for? You must have the wrong account. --75.33.230.133 02:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Cute 1 4 u

I am not her but go head and check me. Gotta go. Bye --TV Lover 02:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

30% vs 33%

I see, thanks for letting me know. The 30% doesn't look great on high res, though. Any ideas on how to make it look good in both? EWS23 (Leave me a message!) 03:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Great job! Glad you found it. What do you think of the general changes over the last 24 hours? Do you like the somewhat revamped/reorganized right hand bar? EWS23 (Leave me a message!) 03:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

My only possible concern is the leadership section, which is a tiny little sliver of a section compared to the others. I think it's good that we have it there, though. I think our two options are: 1. Re-add more details and the timeline, or 2. Keep it as it is (it's really not that big a deal that it's small). What do you think? EWS23 (Leave me a message!) 03:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Alright, I'm satisfied with it then. Let's give it ~24 hours for the regular contributors to the redesign to look it over and see if there's any changes they would make, and then we can post on WT:ESP sometime tomorrow evening. EWS23 (Leave me a message!) 03:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

TV Lover blocked

Gotta love autoblocks :P Ryūlóng 03:58, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Nice

That's really awesome! Let me know if you need a block following the RFCU. alphaChimp^(talk) 04:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)