User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/Justiyaya

Hello, welcome to your New Page Patrol School page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your NPP School page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working).

Make sure you read through Wikipedia:Notability as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.

How to use this page

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.

If both the instructor and student make completing the course curriculum a top priority, it will generally take around a month to go through the entirety of the curriculum. This pace is not required or necessarily expected, but rather is provided in order to give participants an idea of what to expect.

Notability

PART 1

When patrolling or reviewing an article, you may often come across articles do not meet the WP:N guidelines, but the editors make the edits in good faith. Please read WP:AGF and do not WP:BITE the new editors.

A. Notability is a test guidelines to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article in Wikipedia mainspace. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, General Notability Guidelines, Specific Notability Guidelines, Stand-alone list before completing the following tasks.

General notability guidelines

1. In your own words, why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE new editors.

Answer: New editors generally won't know as much policy as more experienced ones, we cannot assume the same amount of clue from them compared to more experienced editors. Assuming good faith and not biting new editors avoids driving away new editors that are willing and would contribute but haven't gotten a chance to learn much policy yet who might later grow to become more established ones. AGF encourages bold editing and prevents all editors from being discouraged. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

2. In your own words, how is notability defined in Wikipedia?

Answer: The ability for us to write an article that is supported by reliable sources to ensure that topics are "worthy of note" and prevent the inclusion of every topic. The exception being topics in WP:NOT should not be included and thus is not notable. A topic is presumed to be notable if it meets any accepted notability criteria. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. In Wikipedia, notability means "worthy to be noted" - it is defined as a topic is "presumably" notable for stand-alone article or list if (1) it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject whee by the sources talk "directly" about the subject in depth and in length and not only passing mentioned and (2) it is not excluded under the What WP:Wikipedia is not policy. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

3. Does a step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" considered a notable topic in Wikipedia?

Answer: No, Wikipedia is not a a how to guide so instructions on how to change a car tire is not a notable topic. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

4. What are the differences between A WP:GNG and a specific notability guidelines? how do we determine which one to use when patrolling an article?

Answer: GNG goes for all articles and topics while SNGs goes for its specific subject. If any SNG is met, an article should not be speedly deleted (in all deletion methods) before sufficient time is given to locate sources. SNGs and GNG are all used to determine notability and an article can be deleted at afd even if both are met (unlikely). SNGs are based on GNG, if an SNG is to be met, the article either meets GNG or is likely to. I think an article can be patrolled if any GNG or SNG is met. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Specific notability guidelines

5. If an editor creates an article about "2024 Summer Olympics" in 2019 without providing any sources, is the subject considered not notable and why?

Answer: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and the guideline suggests that "scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place". If there exists significant reliable sources that would allow the article to achieve notability, and is almost certain to take place, then an article should be made. While the page is created without any sources, which would certainly not prove notability, notability is based on the existence of sources and sources are likely to exist for the subject. Therefore the subject is probably notable. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

B. Without considered of sources/content policies and review just based on "subject specific notability" (SSN) "alone" for sake of the exercises below, please answer if the subject meets the SSN guidelines, based on the given content below, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

6. A New York city based 2021 start up software company , specializing in data mining, has just received a USD 200K investor fund.

Answer: WP:ORG should apply, which is basically GNG. I would say that the subject is not clearly notable under any notability guideline. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

7. Guram Kutateladze who is a Ultimate Fighting Championships fighters with the undefeated mixed martial arts record of 12-2.

Answer: WP:NMMA applies, the topic is likely to be notable due to them being ranked top 10 for their weight class in sherdog. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

N Not providing World top ten ranking by Sherdog and on Fight Metrix ranking he ranks #20 in Lightweight on 04/01/2021 - see here-1 which most likely he has not been ranked in top 10 in Sherdog ranking. In addition, he has only one fight under top tier MMA promotion (UFC) and short to meet at least 3 fights under MMA SSG notability guidelines - see here -2. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

8. A upcoming action drama title "Suleiman the Great" based on the the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, was reported will be in production in December 2022 and to be released on August 2023 in the cinemas.

Answer: WP:NFF should apply and exclude the article from being notable for being too speculative. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y because "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles". Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

9. A political candidates, without any previous or current political position, who is running for November 2021 election for a Senator position in United States with multiple local newspapers coverage of his candidacy.

Answer: I think WP:GNG should apply along with WP:NPOL, I don't think there is a WP:AUD like guideline for politicians so I think the subject is likely notable. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Actually on second thought: If they were elected, WP:NPOL would apply, otherwise WP:BASIC might, don't think there is a WP:AUD like guideline for biographies. Justiyaya 09:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

N To pass WP:NPOL, once needs to be officially elected to state/national position unless the subject is covered by national newspapers in significant coverage for most candidates would have some coverage by local newspapers during their campaign. Cassiopeia talk 07:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

10. A singer who self produced his first album in May 2020 and his songs are listed in Spotify.

Answer: None of WP:MUSICBIO should be met unless they have met GNG. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

C. Based on which SSN guidelines the below subjects are notable under (1) which notability criteriaMUSICBI#1 (if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations

11. Carlos Alós-Ferrer

Answer: WP:NACADEMIC point 8, article says "editor in chief of the Journal of Economic Psychology" assuming that the journal is well established. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y Also, the subject meets criteria 1 for WP:NPROF #1 [1] for being highly cited. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

12. Alistair Overeem

Answer: WP:NMMA applies, the topic is likely to be notable due to them being ranked top 10 for their weight class in sherdog. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y Subject also pass WP:NKICK for being K-1 World Grand Prix Champion. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

13. Jennifer Lopez

Answer: WP:MUSICBIO points 1 and likely 5 article says "Tommy Mottola, the head of Sony Music's Work Group, signed her". Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y - Meets WP:ENTERTAINER - 1,2,3; WP:SINGER - almost all criteria and she also passes WP:NACTOR as she has featured in major roles in many movies. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

14. Three Mile Island accident

Answer: WP:EVENTCRIT applies with numbers 1 and 2 being lasting effect and widespread coverage. Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

15. Persepolis

Answer: WP:NBUILDING being a "Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage" Justiyaya 03:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 07:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

---

Justiyaya, Good day. See assignment 1 above.

(1) For all the assignments, pls provide hist diffs of the articles, reverts, edits, reports, results of the reports, talk page messages that are applicable.

(2) Pls provide guidelines where applicable and justify/explain in details of your application or analysis.

(3) Pls ping me if you need assistance (here in this program page at the communication section of every assignment).

(4) Please book mark this page and ping me when you have finished the assignment for me to review.

(5) If you need to take a break from editing Wikipedia for more than 2 weeks, pls inform me so I may know. If you Stay safe and best. Welcome to NPPS.

Cassiopeia talk 00:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Cassiopeia, I've finished the assignments above, can you please look over them? Justiyaya 09:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya, See comments above. Let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignment. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Cassiopeia, think I'm mostly a bit confused about how to read sherdog rankings. For question 15 would I've correct if I linked WP:GEOFEAT instead? Also can you please take a look at question 9, a bit unsure about that one. Otherwise I think I'm ready to move on. Justiyaya 06:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya, sorry about Q 15. See comment on Q9. And let me know if you have any more questions or good to move on. Cassiopeia talk 07:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Cassiopeia thanks for the corrections, I think I'm ready to move on :D Justiyaya 07:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

---

Sources

Background for trainees

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for such content claimed should be supported by independent (secondary), reliable sources for verification. Please read WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:RSP, WP:V, WP:PROVEIT, WP:Primary, WP:Secondary, and WP:Tertiary and answered the the below questions in your own words.

You could contact WP:RX if you could not find the sources yourself either on web due to Paywall content or printed books.

---

Exercises

1.

Topic	Explanation	5 Examples	Comment by Cass
Reliable source	A source that has published, recent (depending on context and subject), good editorial oversight, and a reputation for factual information. A source reliable in one field might not be in another. Reliable isn't a on/off switch but more of a scale.	(example)The Guardian newspaper New York Times Washington Post Pitchfork (website) (most) peer reviewed studies published in a reputable journal Nature (journal)	Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
User generated sources	Sources that rely on users to produce content. Mostly unacceptable as a reliable source. Limit use to (certain) claims about the writer themselves.	Twitter Reddit Metacritic (certain sections) Wordpress Wikipedia	Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Non Independent source	A source that shares a conflict of interest with the subject themselves or relies mostly on press releases, non-independence sources can be used to support claims about the writer if there is no exceptional claim but otherwise should not be used.	A flower shop website's about its self A .gov website about the US gov New York times writing about the New York Times A tweet stating the subject's birthday written by the subject A youtube promotional ad for a product.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

---

2.

Type	Explanation	Sources (15 Primary ; 5 Secondary ; 5 Tertiary)	Comment by Cass
Primary	Sources that are close to the subject. Often containing original research or investigation, or offer insider accounts to an event. Should only be used with caution on Wiki and replaced with secondary sources if possible.	(example) scientific journal articles reporting experimental research results Op-Ed of someone's account of a thing Interviews Diaries Autobiographies Governmental Records Laws (most) photos of objects Religious texts Paintings Summary of a book Quotes Results from a survey Courtroom sketches Artifacts Manuals written by the manufacturer Phone calls	Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Secondary	A source that use primary sources along with author's own analysis to create discussion, should be the preferred source when writing articles and research.	(example) newspaper Review articles Argumentative essays based on the author and primary sources Books summarizing and providing the author's opinion on a research topic Nytimes analysis piece Reviews of a work of art	Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Tertiary	A source that summarizes primary and secondary sources, should not be used for academic research, cite with caution on Wikipedia.	(example) encyclopedias Textbooks Dictionary Travel guides Cook books if there is no new recipes introduced How to guides written by a third party on multiple products	Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

---

3.

Subject	Primary	Secondary	Tertiary	Comment by Cass
Example: Art	Example:Sculpture	Example:Article critiquing the sculpture	Example:Encyclopedic article on the sculptor
History	Artifact	Research article analyzing how the artifact was used	Text book introducing history of a place	Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Science	Newly produced experimental research	Review article analyzing new research	Wikipedia page on the topic	Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Athletes	Self published post written by the athlete themselves on their achievements	Newspaper report on the athlete	list of the athletes competitions wins/losses that summarizes reliable sources	Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

---

4. Please explain in your own words why the content claimed needs to be verified?

Answer: Content needs to verified to ensure that the content is accurate and so that researchers have citations that they can use elsewhere. Justiyaya 08:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Content needs to verifiable so we may know where the info/source from for we could know if the source is independent and/or reliable, and not because it is the facts or true - see WP:But it's true!. If source indicated XXX is from Jamaica but the fact XXX is from Cuba, we put XXX is from Jamaica in article as per source. We will correct the info when the sources (not need to be the same source) correct itself. For example Alexander the Great - How he die is based on which sources you read, from poising, to malaria and typhoid fever to infectious (meningitis) to acute pancreatitis and etc. Cassiopeia talk 06:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

5.Could we used Wikipedia as the source? and why?

Answer: No, Wikipedia is a tertiary source and thus should not be used, additionally it is also a user generated source. Justiyaya 08:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

{{tick}. Wikipedia can not be the sources as the content of Wikipedia is supported by "other sources" - See WP:CIRCULAR. Wikipedia is a online knowledge sharing platform. Readers should check the sources in the article and verify/read the info themselves. Cassiopeia talk 06:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

6.Give an example and explain why a source is reliable but not independent of a subject?

Answer: If a source is reliable, but is either writing about themselves, or share a conflict of interest with the subject, then that source is not independent of a subject but reliable. For example, the New York Times is widely accepted as reliable, but should not be used as an independent source for New York Times Co. v. United States, at the very least when the case is occurring, recent retrospective reports might be considered more independent. Justiyaya 08:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Good. Cassiopeia talk 06:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

7.Give an example and explain why a source is independent source but not reliable?

Answer: The Daily Mail might write about something it has no conflict of interest with and do so without much bias but it is considered generally unreliable because The Daily Mail has gotten a reputation for publishing false information. Justiyaya 08:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

---

Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" for no or "?" after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

Example Article about Bill Gates

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/williamhgates/	Linkedin is considered not independent as the info is provided by the subject.	Self published	Probably has significant info, I don't have a linked in account	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

8.

David Petraeus

David Howell Petraeus AO (/pɪˈtreɪ.əs/; born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011, until his resignation on November 9, 2012 after his affair with Paula Broadwell was reported.

Petraeus was born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, the son of Sixtus Petraeus (1915–2008), a sea captain from Franeker, Netherlands.

In 2003, Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in the fall of Baghdad

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/	No clear vested interest shown	Likely good editorial oversight, cannot find anything that suggest that it doesn't	Whole article is basically about him	✔ Yes
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch	No clear vested interest shown	Per RSPS	? Was unable to access, depending if it's just a video of the subject being sworn in (then not significant) or contains analysis on the subject by CNN (then significant)	? Unknown
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893	No clear vested interest shown	? Although does not appear to be written by non staff contributors, no real consensus was formed per 2020 RFC about it's reliability and bias. note that the article was published in 2012 and the RFC says that "reliability has increased since 2012".	Full article about the subject	? Unknown
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012	Appears to be user generated	Appears to be user generated	Probably not, really about basic info	✘ No
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005	No clear conflict of interest	Considered reliable per RSPS	Full article about the subject	✔ Yes
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html	? Source is a interview, claims by the interviewee are probably non independent and claims by the interviewer are probably independent	? Claims by the subject can be used if it meets WP:BLPSELFPUB	Whole page about subject	? Unknown
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html	No clear vested interest	Reliable per RSPS	Whole article about him	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y

1.USA Today source it establish SIGCOV- It is considered SIGCOC as the source addresses the topic directly and in detail it does not matter if the source covers only one aspect of the subject life. Do note to establish notability, it needs many sources and not about one source.

2. Huffpost - It is ok just cover on aspect of the subject t but HuffPost contributors/editors of the article is considered not reliable in WP:RSP but if we look closely, the piece is written by By ANNE FLAHERTY, KIMBERLY DOZIER AND ADAM GOLDMAN, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. The Associated press is considered reliable source as they sell their news to other news agencies. However, the content is based on many individual opinions, for such I would talk it as not reliable sources.

3. https://www.geni.com - it is an independent source as it has no relation with the subject but it is not a reliable source.

4. PBS is reliable source but it is not independent because it is an interview piece.

Cassiopeia talk 06:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

9. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:WP:ANYBIO "significant award or honor" and potentially WP:NPOL point 1 held national office. Justiyaya 08:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

{{yellow tick}. Being a CIA director and a United States Army general in is not really a politician per say, but he passes Military history/Notability guide#2 as a U.S Army general as per the content above.(note a person who serves in the military is not a politician and visa versa unless they have held both positions in the said fields above such as Leonidas I, Julius Caesar, Ulysses S. Grant, Napoleon Bonaparte or Dwight D. Eisenhower then they would pass both WP:NPOL. Cassiopeia talk 06:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

---

10.

Martina Hingis is a Swiss former professional tennis player. She won five Grand Slam singles titles. Hingis was one of the highest-paid female athletes in 2000. She retired in November 2007 after being hampered by a hip injury for several months and testing positive for a metabolite of cocaine during that year's Wimbledon Championships, which led to a two-year suspension from the sport.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.instagram.com/martinahingis80/	Source is the subject	? WP:BLPSELFPUB applies	bunch of pictures	✘ No
https://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-us-open-hingis-20170910-story.html	no clear vested interest	WP:LATIMES	Entire article about subject	✔ Yes
	no clear conflict of interest	? Can't really find much about the author or the publisher online	? Cannot access source but if it's one page it's likely not very significant, whereas a chapter might have been?	? Unknown
https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/21171438/tennis-another-twist-bizarre-career-martina-hingis	No clear vested interest	Reliable based on discussion	Whole article about subject	✔ Yes
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/nov/01/tennis	No clear vested interest	Does appear to be written by staff and not contributers	Whole article about subject	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y. Tennis Confidential: Today's Greatest Players, Matches, and Controversies. Potomac Books is considered reliable source. Cassiopeia talk 06:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

11. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: WP:NTENNIS point 2 and likely 4 or 5 Justiyaya 08:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Subject pass WP:NTENNIS SSN (sport specific notability) - Full content from the article Martina Hingis would pass all the WP:NTENNIS criteria. Cassiopeia talk 06:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

---

Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" or "?" for no after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

12.

Fallingwater, Mill Run, Pennsylvania (1937)

Frank Lloyd Wright (June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959) was an American architect, interior designer, writer, and educator. Wright believed in designing structures that were in harmony with humanity and its environment, a philosophy he called organic architecture. His creative period spanned more than 70 years. He works includes The Guggenheim, swirling, snail-shaped museum in the middle of Manhattan. Fallingwater, which has been called "the best all-time work of American architecture." This is one of Wright's most famous private residences (completed 1937), was built for Mr. and Mrs. Edgar J. Kaufmann, Sr., at Mill Run, Pennsylvania. Constructed over a 30-foot waterfall, it was designed according to Wright's desire to place the occupants close to the natural surroundings. The house was intended to be more of a family getaway, rather than a live-in home.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://nypost.com/2017/06/07/frank-lloyd-wright-was-a-house-builder-and-homewrecker/	no clear vested interest	WP:NYPOST	Whole article about subject	✘ No
https://franklloydwright.org/work/	The subject's website	Likely should not be used	Whole page about subject	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20080302053743/http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2004/nf20040728_3153_db078.htm	no clear vested interest	Appears to have a good record (until 2018) per it's Wikipedia entry Bloomberg Businessweek	Whole article about subject	✔ Yes
https://books.google.com/books?id=KSA1HTTU-eMC	Published quite long after the subject's death, does not appear to have any	Publisher appears to be notable and have a good track record content wise but has controversies regarding copyright.	Whole book about Subject	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

13. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:Most if not all of the points in WP:ARCHITECT Justiyaya 08:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. The subject meets the criteria: WP:BASIC, WP:ARCHITECT – criteria 1, 3 and 4, WP:ANYBIO – 1 and 2. Full content from the article of Frank Lloyd Wright, he would pass all the all (1-4) WP:ARCHITECT criteria. Cassiopeia talk 06:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

---

14.

Jordan Lennon (born February 22, 2000), is a British film producer and actor. Lennon is currently a member of BAFTA. He continues to work aside 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, Wicked Wales, Capture Studios, Cineworld, Paramount Pictures, and Rockefeller Foundation.

At age 16, the Vice President of 20th Century Fox, Paul Higginson. Who previously worked on Star Wars, Titanic, and Independence Day took on Jordan and Rowan Snow as a mentor. In December 2018, Jordan and Rowan finished British Film Academy. Jordan lived in Skelmersdale for 10 years before moving to Rhyl, North Wales. He's currently writing 'Stranger in the Night' scrreenplay for Warner Brothers.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8902348/	likely written by independent users?	User generated, don't use in BLPs	? 404 error, likely significant	✘ No
http://www.bafta.org/wales	Vested interest as a member of the site.	? not established but likely written or approved by the subject	redirected me to their main page but it's likely that they gave significant coverage	✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-d-98111a125	Published by the subject	? Self published BLP, same guideline as before	unable to access, probably sigcov	✘ No
https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Jordan-David/	no clear vested interest	likely user generated	basic information with minimal writing	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y - https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com is condisered independent and reliable but does not cover the subject in SIGCOV. Cassiopeia talk 06:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

15. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Likely not, nothing in WP:ENTERTAINER seems to apply Justiyaya 08:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

---

16.

Sonny Bill Williams 2010

Sonny William Williams (born 3 August 1985), who is a Muslim, is a New Zealand All blacks rugby union footballer, Williams was a Marist Saints junior when he was spotted playing in Auckland by Bulldogs talent scout John Ackland. In 2002 he was offered a contract and moved to Sydney (as the youngest player to ever sign with an NRL club) to play in the Bulldogs' junior grades.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7505117/2019-Rugby-World-Cup-Sonny-Bill-Williams-expecting-fourth-child.html		Wikipedia:DAILYMAIL	Whole article about subject	✘ No
http://stats.allblacks.com/asp/Profile.asp?ABID=1108	Appears to be a sports organization per it's about us page	No editorial oversight shown, no evidence of reliability	Whole page about subject	✘ No
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/warriors-league-team/news/article.cfm?c_id=360&objectid=10399308	Is an interview, subject interview is a football player	nzherald is likely reputable	Passing mention	✘ No
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/10/01/1096527943523.html	No clear vested interest	Per RSPS	14 mentions, half the article is about the subject	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:54, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

17. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Likely point 3 in WP:RLN, "appeared in at least one match of a fully professional club rugby league competition" Justiyaya 08:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Sonny Bill Williams (full content), the subject would also meet WP:NRU criteria 1, 2 a a rubgy union player also WP:NBOX criterion 1 as a boxer, WP:RLN criteria 1, 3 as a ruby league player. Cassiopeia talk 06:54, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

---

18.

Bryan Adams Guadalajara 2006

"Can't Stop This Thing We Started" is a song by Canadian singer and songwriter Bryan Adams. The song was written by Adams and Robert John "Mutt" Lange, and was the second single from Adams' 1991 album Waking Up the Neighbours where by the song was nominated for Grammy Award 1992 "Song of the Year"

Weekly charts

Chart (1991-1992)	Peak position
US Mainstream Rock (Billboard)	2
Denmark (IFPI)	2
US Billboard Hot 100	2

End-of-year charts

End-of-year chart (1991)	Position
Canada Top Singles (RPM)	3

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.nytimes.com/1992/01/09/arts/grammy-short-list-many-for-a-few.html	no clear vested interest	Reputable source	Passing mention	✘ No
https://www.billboard.com/music/Bryan-Adams/chart-history/RTT	No clear vested interest	Reputable source	404ed but likely passing mention	✘ No
https://www.billboard.com/music/Bryan-Adams/chart-history/HSI	No clear vested interest	Reputable source	404ed but likely passing mention	✘ No
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/films-videos-sound-recordings/rpm/Pages/image.aspx?Image=nlc008388.2024&URLjpg=http%3a%2f%2fwww.collectionscanada.gc.ca%2fobj%2f028020%2ff4%2fnlc008388.2024.gif&Ecopy=nlc008388.2024	No clear vested interest	Appears to be reputable before it shut down see RPM (magazine)	Passing mention	✘ No
https://www.musicvf.com/song.php?title=Can%27t+Stop+This+Thing+We+Started+by+Bryan+Adams&id=7272	No clear vested interest	? not much found online about it	basic info with minimal writing	✘ No
https://musicchartsarchive.com/singles/bryan-adams/cant-stop-this-thing-we-started	No clear vested interest	? Probably? not much about on the internet	minimal written section with only chart listing	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

N.For Song which the sources indicate the ranking ofthe chart is considered significant coverage. Cassiopeia talk 07:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

19. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Likely fails WP:NSINGLE, nominated for Grammy but did not win, point 1 might apply based on national or significant music or sales charts. Also "standalone article is appropriate only when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album", article should likely be merged/redirected. Justiyaya 08:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

N. The subject meets WP:NSONG criterion 1 - has been on charts and it is considered notable and GNG as the article has been created since 2007 - see Can't Stop This Thing We Started and has not been once nominated for deletion. Cassiopeia talk 07:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

---

20.

Kamlesh Bhatt is a Solution Architect and a DevOps Engineer living in Singapore. I am a fan of technology, music, and entrepreneurship. He is interested in photography and travel. He could be reached at his blog and youtube channel.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://medium.com/@kamleshbhatt_	created by subject	? BLP guidlines on self referencing applies	? 404ed dead link	✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kamlesh-bhatt-45392961/	created by subject	? BLP guidlines on self referencing applies	Likely... don't have a linkedin account yet.	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y. Cassiopeia talk 07:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

21. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:Fails WP:ANYBIO, no evidence based on article, likely G11 CSD Justiyaya 08:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 07:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

---

Justiyaya See assignment 2 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 08:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya Have you finished the assignment? Kindly inform. Cassiopeia talk 09:42, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Think I'm done unless I missed a part Justiyaya 09:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Cassiopeia any updates on the course? Justiyaya 07:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya Will finish the review by tmr. Stay safe. Cassiopeia talk 10:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Hiii, think you've might've forgotten about this, thanks Justiyaya 06:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya So sorry. Frist my internet was down, then I was sick then I had some personal matter needed my attention. When I was back, I reviewed a few of of my student assingment and sorry I missed yours. See comments above and let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignment. Again, my appologies. Cassiopeia talk 07:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Yeah think I'm ready to move on, looked over the feedback. Thanks for explaining and hope everything is better now. Justiyaya 10:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

---

Content Policy

Article titles

Please read WP:TITLE and answer the questions below

1. Article name "Hannibal Barca" - Does the article name need to be change? and Why? (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Hannibal Barca was a Carthaginian general and statesman who is widely considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His father, Hamilcar Barca, was a leading Carthaginian commander during the First Punic War (264–241 BC).

References

Answer: The name needs to be changed per WP:Commonname, most sources refer to the subject as simply "Hannibal" Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Y. Very well, you tackled two points here - need to change the article name as per WP:COMMONNAME and make a redirect of "Hannibal Barca" to "Hannibal" article. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

---

2. Article name "Magic Johnson". Does the article name need to be change? and Why?(please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Earvin "Magic" Johnson Jr. (born August 14, 1959) is an American retired professional basketball player and former president of basketball operations of the Los Angeles Lakers of the National Basketball Association (NBA). He played point guard for the Lakers for 13 seasons.

References

Answer: No change needed per WP:Commonname, most sources refer to the subject as Magic Johnson Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

---

Biographies of living persons

Please read WP:BLP and answer the questions below.

3. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Conor Anthony McGregor (born 14 July 1988) is an Irish professional mixed martial artist and boxer. His is a former Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) featherweight and lightweight champion.

On 15 August 2019, TMZ Sports published a video that appeared to show McGregor punching a man at The Marble Arch Pub in Dublin. The incident happened on 6 April and was originally reported by Irish media, although without the video that showed the attack. Irish police stated in April that they had opened an investigation. McGregor was charged with assault and first appeared in court on 11 October 2019.

In April 2019, McGregor is the father of Terri Murray's son, Clodagh. Murray bedded McGregor in 2017 at his hotel after the Aintree Grand National just four weeks bofore McGregor's girlfriend Dee Devlin gave birth to their son.

References

Answer: Last sentence unsourced, should be removed per WP:V and BLP, also ref 6 needs to be removed as unreliable per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 295#RfC: RT (Russia Today), otherwise seems fine Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Y. I think you meant ref 4 (Russian Today). Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

---

4. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Diana Nyad (née Sneed; born August 22, 1949) is an American author, journalist, motivational speaker, and long-distance swimmer who lives in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. and could be contacted at +0-202-456-6213. Nyad gained national attention in 1975 when she swam around Manhattan (28 mi or 45 km) and in 1979 when she swam from North Bimini, The Bahamas, to Juno Beach, Florida (102 mi (164 km)). In 2013, on her fifth attempt and at age 64, she became the first person confirmed to swim from Cuba to Florida without the aid of a shark cage, swimming from Havana to Key West (110 mi or 180 km).

References

Answer: WP:BLPPRIVACY, address and phone numbers should be oversighted Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Y. By the way, the address and tel belong to the White House. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

---

Images copyright

Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Public domain image resources. Please answer the questions below and (1) with explanation based on Wikipedia guidelines and (2) provide the guidelines/links in your answer.

5. Could this image-1 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: Yes, most works of U.S. GOV employees are released to the public domain Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Answer - link/guideline: [2]

Y. Public domain images can be uploaded to Wikipedia. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

6. Could this image-2 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: website notes that the image was aquired from flickr and was released under CC0 (public domain) so it can be uploaded Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Y. We also always need to check the "original site" (the original source) that the image is in PD (public domain). If we click on the flickr link provided on the right of the image it will take your to [3] where it was uploaded by the owner and stated public domain (PD) there. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

7. Could this image-3 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia?

Answer- Explanation: Public domain, was released by the website under that licence Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Answer - link/guideline: See commons file licence tags

Y. Again we need to check the original source as not all the images are free use claimed by the editor who uploaded the images that the images were taken by them and agree to released the right or the upload the photo is a PD. If we follow the link (source) from Wikimdeia here - Pixabay and it is stated "Free for commercial use" and also on Wikimedia it is verify by reviewer. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

8. Could this image-4 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: Exceeds the threashold of originality, no public domain markings on website, probably not. Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Answer - link/guideline: [4]

Y. This image can not be used as it violated copyrights. It's somebody's work of art, it is not on a public domain or provided by the author. This image can be use only if the copyright holder provides allowance. One way we could check it to download the image to our computer and use Tineye] where you might able to find some reverse images on the internet. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

---

Neutral point of view

Please read WP:NPOV and MOS:PUFF. Point out the WP:NPOV words/pharses and rewrite the paragraph on Question 9& 10 from a neutral point of view.

9. She is a brilliant boxer with a rare and exceptional beauty. She turned Pro at the age of 19 after winning one amateur fight on December 14, 2013 where she destroyed her opponent in 20 seconds. Her talent and marketability made her a fighter to watch right out the gate and she fought under XXX promotion on her next fight on February 2014.

Answer: She is a boxer. She turned Pro at the age of 19 after winning one amateur fight on December 14, 2013 where she knocked out her opponent in 20 seconds. She fought under XXX promotion and her next fight is on February 2014.

(brilliant, rare, exceptional beauty, destory, talent and marketability, watch right out the gate.) Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Y Good. The words/phrases "brilliant, rare, exceptional beauty, destroy, talent and marketability, watch right out the gate" are considered WP:PUFF and should be removed as per WP:NPOV. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

10. He is a popular, acclaimed Bulgarian actor, who loves by all who have watched his films. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry since he was at the tender, innocent of the age of 14 and he has featured in 44 films.

Answer: He is a Bulgarian actor in films. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry since he was at the age of 14 and he was featured in 44 films.

(popular, acclaimed, loves by all, tender, innocent) Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Y. The words/phrases "popular, acclaimed, loves by all, tender, innocent" re considered WP:PUFF and should be removed as per WP:NPOV. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

11. Please read WP:DUE and in your own words, please explain why it is important to provide balance and due weight content in an article.

Answer: Extensive descriptions of a minority opinion may mislead the reader to thinking that it is the majority or it is widely accepted as a viewpoint. The undue weight may also create a false sense of the debate surrounding the topic. Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Y Article should be represented all significant viewpoints in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources to give duel weight ( majority and minority views) by adding/remove details or other means. Take Capital punishment article for example - it provides a balance and due weight content, representing all mainstream points of view in reliable sources. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

---

No original research

Please read WP:OR and WP:NOT and answer the questions below

12. In your own words, why Wikipedia is not a platform to publish original research?

Answer: We are an encyclopedia and a tertiary source. Most original resarch is considered a primary or secondary source, and as such does not belong here. Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

N. Wikipedia's inclusion policies require all the content to be previously published by numerous independent reliable sources. It doesn't allow any opinions or ideas. Original research is a subjective point of view, not reviewed or fact checked by reliable sources. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

13. In your own words, please provide one example with explanation when it is appropriate to insert an original research or an opinion in an article.

Answer: Limited quotations of someone elses opinion while attributing the opinion to its author and noting that it is an opinion. Such as (name) of (certain website) wrote that this album is (...) Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Y. We could use exact words from the source in the article when (1) it is a public domain sites (2) the author/site has released their copyright and anyone to use the content/image such as " agree to irrevocably agree to release content/image under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL or under the Creative Commons license. (3) a direct quote and provide the source. Example Constitution of the United States and in Robert Whittaker (fighter) page (see below direct quote). Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

In an interview with GQ Australia, he stated:

I am immensely proud to be an Australian and to be a pioneer in the sport to, you know, lead, lead today's MMA scene against all these other countries, you know, it really, it really does light me up, to see that the Australian flag when I walk out, you know, to hear them called out that I'm Australian and I am very patriotic. I am really proud of my country and proud of where I am from.

References

14. See this video and write the content in the in an article by using the video info as the source.

Answer: Islam requires clothing to be baggy and non-seethrough, jeans are not allowed according to Islam. Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Y Good. You have indicated the info is from Sh.Shady Alsuleiman instead just stated "wearing jeans is ......." Another way to do it is to use a direct quote (see below). Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

“ Islam demands Islam commands us with our with regards of our clothing for both men and women, our clothing must be first of all baggy, so must be loose with a men or women. It must non see-through whether men or women. It must non colorful attractive that means when someone walks everyone's looking at them. ”

References

---

Verifiability

Please read WP:V and answer the questions below

15. If the subject has two sons and it is supported by three independent, reliable sources but in reality he has 3 sons. Could we change the content from "2" sons to "3 sons"? and why?

Answer: It depends, if the subject has a self published source claiming to have three sons, it might be alright under WP:BLPSELFPUB, otherwise Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth should be followed Justiyaya 06:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

N. Wikipedia is all about verifiability from independent reliable sources. We correct the content when the source corrected itself (same source or other sources). Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

---

Justiyaya See assignment 3 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 23:09, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya hi, I have posted assignment 3 above for more than 10 days but I have yet to see you work on it. Let me know if you have any issues or questions. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 03:38, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Whoops sorry I'll finish it today Justiyaya 05:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya Besides linking the guidelines, you need to explain/reasons your answers. Kindly redo those answer you provide only guidelines links.10:10, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Cassiopeia are you referring to the Images copyright section? If so I think I've provided a written explanation right below the bolded question. Justiyaya 12:50, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Is the above alright or did I do something wrong? Justiyaya 06:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya Additional info is ok. Will review tmrw. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 02:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya See comments above and let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignment. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Thanks for grading it and I think I'm ready to move on to the next assignment. Although it might take me a while to finish since I'm experiencing internet issues. Justiyaya 06:54, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

__________

Filtering - Criteria for speedy deletion

PART 2

We have looked at the requirements needed for a page to meet notable, policy and type of sources to merit a page in Wikipedia in Part 1 (Assignment 1, 2 & 3). In assignment 4, we look at what type of articles need to be filtered out from our system when reviewing a page. There are many criteria of WP:Criteria for speedy deletion. Here we discuss (1) General criteria (G1-G14), (2) Article criteria (A1-A11) and R2.

Please do the following

1. Pls set up your CSD log by installing MYCSD so I could review your CSD nomination. After saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes - see instruction at Wikipedia:Bypass your cache.
2. Bookmark Earwig's Copyvio Detector in computer; and install Earwig Copyvio Detector script. (The "copyvio" will appear on the left panel under "Tools" section on every page in Wikipedia.
3. Install CV-revdel and after saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes - see instruction at Wikipedia:Bypass your cache.

General criteria

1. Please (G1-G14) at General and answer the following questions in your own words.

No	Criterion	Application	Comment by Cass
1	G1	Gibberish that is incomprehensable in any language, does not apply to sandboxes/userpages	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
2	G2	Testing that is not done is sandbox/userpages	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
3	G3	Clear hoaxes and vandalism, does not include articles describing hoaxes	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
4	G4	Pages that has been recreated after AFD (or any other deletion process that is not (BLP)PROD or CSD) deletion	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
5	G5	Pages made by users that have been blocked/confirmed for sock puppetry who's main account is blocked or topic-banned from area. Page must not have substancial contribution from other editors (similar to G7)	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
6	G6	Technical deletions, commonly (I think) to remove redirects blocking page moves, but also to fix bad AFD closes or copy and paste moves	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
7	G7	Used to delete pages where the author who is also the only major contributor to the page requests deletion or blanks the page.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
8	G8	Talk pages of deleted pages, subpages of deleted pages, other pages that is dependent on another page that was deleted	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
9	G9	WMF wants to nuke something probably due to DMCA takedown, cannot be reversed without foundation premission	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
10	G10	Attack pages, pages that make legal/other threats to anyone, BLP articles with non-NPOV and entirely negative in tone and unsourced.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
11	G11	Non neutral display of subject, designed particularly to promote something. Needs to be rewritten to be encyclopedic.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
12	G12	Copyright issues, including blatant copying and pasting and close paraphrasing, where there is no version without copyvio.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
13	G13	Draft space only, pages that haven't been edited in 6 months.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
14	G14	Disambig pages with only one link, only if it cannot be boldly redirected to the article.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Article and R2 criteria

1. Please (A1-A11) criteria at WP:CSD#List of criteria and answer the following questions in your own words.

No	Criterion	Application	Comment by Cass
1	A1	Short articles who's subject cannot be identified. Non english content that has context cannot be deleted under this criteria.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
2	A2	Article is the exact same as another one on another Wikimedia project and is not in English, if not and is foriegn language, tag with Template:Not English instead	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
3	A3	No content in the article, consisting only of external links/images/tags, new articles created within a few minutes should not be tagged	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
4	A5	Article that has already been copied and pasted to another Wikimedia project and therefore is a duplicate	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
5	A7	Any article about a singlular animal, organization, site or event that has not given an indication of significance by making a credable claim of significance and have no references that suggest the potential of notability.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
6	A9	Same as A7 but with musical recordings such as singles or albums	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
7	A10	Recently created pages (< 3 weeks) that duplicates another topic but does not expand on the existing content and is not a viable redirect	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
8	A11	No indication of significance (same as A7) and also with indication that the subject was made up by the creator	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
9	R2	For draftifications and other mainspace redirects to certain non mainspace name spaces	Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

---

3. Please read WP:PROMOTION and WP:G11 and provide 5 successful CSD 11 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and hist diffs and I will check them at your CSD log.

Answer i:

HRM Oba Faluade Fakayode Adeṣina - Special:Diff/1100724180, was deleted and restored and deleted again after page move see logs and talk page discussion

Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer ii:

GUSEC - Gujarat University Startup And Entrepreneurship Council and GUSEC with Special:Diff/1100935680 and Special:Diff/1100935599 (two seperate G11s) July #5-6, notified with Special:Diff/1100935692

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer iii:

Andi Rahman - Special:Diff/1101091837, recreated and tagged with Special:Diff/1101097230 again, see also logs July #7 and 10, notified with Special:Diff/1101091840

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer iv:

Draft:Awaaz Social Welfare Society - Special:Diff/1101183646 July #11 notified with Special:Permalink/1101183652 (first edit on talk)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer v:

Draft:Manavsewa Ashram - Special:Diff/1101188191 (recreated, see logs) July #12 notified with Special:Permalink/1101188205 (first edit on talk)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

---

Pls read WP:COPYVIO, WP:REVDEL, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:DCM and WP:G12 and answer the questions below.

3. When do we nominated a page for WP:G12 and when do we WP:REVDEL the COPYVIO text?

Answer: If the entire page is copyvio, and there is no content to be saved, and the page history has no clean (non-copyvio) text, then G12. If a user recently added content copied from another site, or some of the page is not copyvio and can be cleaned, then remove the section/part of the article and request revdel for the appropriate range.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 01:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

4. What constitute copyright infringement/violation.

Answer: Close paraphrasing and directly copying and pasting from a source/photo/content incompatable with Wikipedia's licences without claims of fair use or pretending that it is their own work and without a email to VRT donating the content is a copyright violation and should be removed to ensure the encyclopedia is free and open per WP:5P3.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 01:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

5. Why some of the texts found in an article are identical as per its sources and yet they are not considered copyright violation? Please provide three examples.

Answer i: Quotations attributed and limited in length claiming fair use, see In Rainbows#Critical reception for an example.

Y. Good. Cassiopeia talk 01:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer ii: Content copied from a compatable licence adapted for English Wikipedia, see Template:Creative Commons text attribution notice.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 01:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer iii: Some data does not fall under the protection of copyright, like a list of participants competiting in a event or a list of metalists may sometimes be the exact same as the source.

N. Citing primary which is a public domain in a "direct copy and paste / verbatim texts" such as United States Declaration of Independence which was published in 1775 as the Copyright Law gives the copyright protection to the “original works of authorship fixed in in a tangible medium of expression” in the newspaper, magazine and freelance article at the moment of their creation, for the life of the creator plus 70 years after, and 95 years for corporation publication or 120 years from date of creation, whichever is shorter.01:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

6. Why copyright violation needs to be stamped out from Wikipedia and who determined when a violation is lawfully taking place?

Answer: Wikipedia is meant to be a free encyclopedia, if we allow copyrighted works to linger on Wikipedia, it will not be free. Additionally, copyright violations will create legal issues for both the foundation and its contributors, as the copyright owner can take action against the WMF (probably with a DMCA) or less likely the editor that inserted the copyrighted text. The only time when a copyrighted work that is not compatable with Wikipedia's licences can be inserted is when it follows Wikipedia's non free content guidelines which allow quotes and other media to be used under fair use. Ultimately, copyright laws determine if a page is copyvio or not, falsely releasing copyrighted works to creative commons can cause damages or legal issues later on.

Y. copyright infringement violation entails legal implications. Wikipedia takes violation of copyvio "very seriously". Cassiopeia talk 01:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

---

7. Pls read WP:COPYVIO, WP:REVDEL, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:DCM and WP:G12 and provide 5 successful CSD 12 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and I will check them at your CSD log. You can use Earwig's Copyvio Detector tool to check if an article is in violation of COPYVIO.

Answer i:

Manju Devi Gurung - Special:Diff/1101096768 log July #9 talk page Special:Diff/1101096771

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer ii:

Draft:Jose Rizalino L. Acuzar - Special:Diff/1101312779 log July #13 talk page Special:Diff/1101312784

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer iii:

Draft:Mossi Religion - Special:Diff/1101313440 log July #14 talk page Special:Diff/1101313444

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer iv:

Post Scarcity Resource Based Economy - Special:Diff/1101509798 log July #19 talk page Special:Diff/1101509803

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer v:

The worldwide Bangabandhu: Story of an inspirational figure. - Special:Diff/1101835578 log August #1 talk page Special:Diff/1101835584

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

---

8. Pls provide 5 successful CSD in any criteria except WP:G11, WP:G12 and WP:G13 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY"). Pls provide the article names and I will check them at your CSD log.

Answer i:

"Approach shot" - Created in wrong title, moved with Special:Diff/1101228497 and tagged with G6 July #16, no talk page notification

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer ii:

Indonesia national under-19 football team results - Special:Diff/1102262088 prev. AFD, G4 tag August #3 talk page Special:Diff/1102262092

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer iii:

Peter J. Burns G4, originally created and AFDed under Peter J. Burns III (moved to draft by creator and tagged with R2ed with Special:Diff/1102314732, see logs) August #5/6, Special:Diff/1102297178

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer iv:

Ilaldi Sultan (daughter of Bayezid II) with G5, created by blocked sock, tagged with Special:Diff/1102463857 August #7, no talk notification

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer v:

Swimming at the Tokyo Olympics - tagged with Special:Diff/1102816670, blocked sock along with Rowing at the Tokyo Olympics, Boxing at the Tokyo Olympics, Baseball at the Tokyo Olympics and Swimming at the Tokyo Olympics August #9-12, no talk page

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

---

9. Pls read WP:NPPDRAFT. Please explain when to a new page (NPP article) can be move to draft and what should be considered when doing such move?

Answer: Any move to draft must be not previously contested or have copyright violations in the page that is to be moved. If the creator of the page has a clear conflict of interest with the subject, the page can be moved without additional considerations. Otherwise there needs to be evidence of no active improvement and the page needs to be not ready for mainspace while being plausably notable.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 01:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

---

10. Pls read and A1-A11 WP:CSD and and provide 5 successful "Article CSD" articles (with at least two of them are CSD A7) you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY").Pls provide the article names and I will check them at your CSD log.

Answer i CSD A7:

Institute of Mathematical Geography - Special:Diff/1101322731 July #15, notified with Special:Diff/1101322739

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer ii CSD A7:

Ultimate KhoKho - Special:Diff/1102851455 August #13, notified with Special:Diff/1102851464

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer iii any criteria:

Oak Ridge Journal - Special:Diff/1102093277 R2 after draftify, see also User:Justiyaya/Draftify log notified with Special:Diff/1102093286 unlikely to survive AFD, still plausibly notable

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer iv any criteria:

Jean Calder (Musician) - Special:Diff/1102291055 R2 after draftify, see also User:Justiyaya/Draftify log notified with Special:Diff/1102291068, only source likely is routine coverage, unlikely to survive, plausibly notable

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer v any criteria:

Bigg Boss Kannada Mini Season - Special:Diff/1101096378 A3, no content, notified with Special:Diff/1101096383 log July #8

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

---

Copyright violation and paid editors

Pls read WP:COI and WP:PAID and answer the following question

11. How do we spot a COI/PAID editor?

Answer: Look at the paid editing disclosure on their userpage that is required by TOS

If the username of the editor is similar to the subject and/or if they edit only in one subject and/or if they upload an image that cannot be reverse image searched or is a higher resolution than all the ones available. A clear promotional tone when editing. Excessive citing of primary sources. Excessive use of external links. (all listed before may not be really definitive but added up can be enough circumstantial evidence) If any of "our organization", "my client" or "(subject's name) told me to" come up.

Y. COI editors are permitted to edit Wikipedia and create on the affected articles; however, it is "HIGHLY DISCOURAGE/NOT RECOMMENDED" as it is very difficult for the COI editors to write the article/input info into the affected article in [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view}}. COI editors can be sotted as per follow:

1.Use person pronouns and possessives (I, we, my, our)

2.Multiple references to company, financial listings, staff lists, interviews, own publication, press release, blog and with clean references

3.Well written prose 'too perfect to be true' and only with single/2 edits

4.Editors have created multiple company related articles

5.Editors disclosed their COI/PAID in their userpage (not tag with COI disclose), or disclosure when they ask question in WP:Teahouse, WP:Help Desk, WP:AFCHD or receivers' talk pages. Cassiopeia talk 01:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

12. What you should do when you review an NPP article and notice the creator is a COI editor?

Answer: Check if the article contains copyvio or is clearly promotional, if so, tag with G11/12. Check if the article went through AFC (see page history/talk page) Else a draftification may be nessesary per point 3 of Wikipedia:New pages patrol#Drafts and multiple mentions in WP:COI. Maybe warn the editor with {{Template:Uw-coi}}, maybe tag the page with {{Template:COI}} if they haven't disclosed yet. A trip to the noticeboard may be nessesary if the issue cannot be resolved.

Y. tag the article with COI (Assignment 6) and the editor needs to adhered to COI/PAID required (state/disclose in their user page and the article talk page about their COI affiliation as per COI instructions) All articles newly created by COI and PAID editors in the mainspace MUST moved to Draft space so the article would be reviewed first by the AfC (article for creation) in the draft space by AfC reviewer and if approved then it will move to main space for the New Page (NPPS) reviewer for the second time regardless how long and how many articles have been created by the same editor. Cassiopeia talk 01:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

13. Please read WP:PAID. What you should do when you review an NPP article and notice the creator is a paid editor?

Answer: asically everything above but maybe use {{Template:Uw-paid1}} and {{Template:Undisclosed paid}} instead if they havent disclosed. Paid editors are required to disclose "employer, client, and affiliation" based on terms of service.

Y. See comment on Q12. Cassiopeia talk 01:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

---

Justiyaya See Assignment 4 above. Pls note that assignment 4 an 5 are the hardest assignment, so if you have any questions do ask. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 10:24, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Wifi issues seems to be resolved, I think I'll try to finish within two days, thanks :D Justiyaya

Justiyaya OK. Cassiopeia talk 07:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC):

Cassiopeia It was a bit harder than I thought it would be :| Justiyaya 10:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya This is the last hard assignment and the rest are easy except the final exam. For R2 pls tag the article with {{db-r2}}. There are few ways to move a page from one name space to another (draft, main/(article), category, template, File, Help and etc). We can use Twinckle and just move the page from main space to draft space; however, since this is a new page program which means when we review a new page (new article) and deem the article do have protential to be notable but lack IRS (independent, reliable sources), we could do a R2 (request from admin to move the page). Once you have don enough successful R2, you can request for Move Manger right. So use the R2 Template and request a R2 and wait for admin to move the page. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 23:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Yeah I see, thanks. Would it be okay if I use the move to draft script and you can view it via Special:Draftify_log/Justiyaya (redlink but should still work, no logs right now)? I'm slooowly working my way down. Justiyaya 23:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya Many participants find R2 particularlly difficult. We would do move to draft then. You can use the script. I have change the questions on R2 to move to draft. Cassiopeia talk 23:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Cassiopeia This took me a while but I think I'm done Justiyaya 10:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya for Question 7, 8, 9 : pls provide hist diff on editors' talk page of your work on the above answers. For CSD ( pls provide the CSD edit from your CSD log (example: CSD log August 2022 # 16). When you have done, pls ping (note: always provide

1) For all the assignments, pls provide hist diffs of the articles, reverts, edits, reports, results of the reports, talk page messages that are applicable.

(2) Pls provide guidelines where applicable and justify/explain in details of your application or analysis.

as per the communication section in Assignment 1.)

Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

@User:Cassiopeia I think I got all of them Justiyaya 05:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya Reviewed. See comments and let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignment. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 06:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia Thanks for the speedy review and I think I'm ready Justiyaya 09:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

---

Filtering - Deletion policy & other alternatives

In assignment 4, we look at articles which fits in WP:Criteria for speedy deletion (CSD) where by the the articles are deleted within a few hours to 24 hours from the time of the nomination. In Assignment 5, we discuss the what actions should be taken for those articles do not fit under the CSD criteria but do not meet relevant criteria for content of the encyclopedia.

Please read WP:PROD, WP:BLPPROD, WP:MERGE, WP:DRAFTIFY, WP:NPPDRAFT and WP:REDIR, WP:AFD and answer the following questions. (Provide links and hisdiff where they are applied.)

1. Under what circumstances do we propose deletion (PROD) a page and why do we do that?

Answer: A prod is done when no CSD criteria is able to delete the page, and no alternative to deletion (including redirecting immediately or requesting a merge) is viable. The deletion should be unlikely to be contested, and unlike AFD, the tag can be removed by anyone.

Y. PROD is an easier option than AfD or FfD as it doesn't require discussion, however if someone objected to PROD it can't be used anymore. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

2. What should we do before we PROD a page? and what should be considered /action during a nomination?

Answer: Check for previous AFDs and PRODs, check if any CSD criteria applies, page history for recent changes, and check if the reason for deletion is valid. Do a search for references if requesting on notability grouds. The only required action for a PROD to be technically valid is to add the prod template to the article, but an old prod template should be also added to the talk page and it is best practice to notify the page creator.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

3. What is the criteria when nominated a BLPPROD? If we choose not to BLPPROD a page what are the alternatives? (give three examples with explanations)

Answer: The page is about a living person but contains no sources, a BLPPROD can only be removed with a reliable source supporting any statement in the article. If a article cannot be nominated

1. The article can be deleted via standard PROD (PROD and BLPPROD are different, PROD can be used with any article that has not been previously nominated for PROD/AFD before)
2. The article can be draftified (always an option per NPPDRAFT if the article is unlikely to survive AFD and is created recently)
3. The article can be redirected (if the subject is notable primarily for a single event or is involved in a musical ensemble but is not notable on their own)

Y. The other alternative (1) AfD but pls do a WP:BEFORE first. (2) CSD if the page meet CSD criteria. (3) Place inline citation into the body text after find proper independent reliable sources an edit to meet GNG and mark review. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

4. In what circumstances we nominate an AFD and what step should be done prior such action.

Answer: Check if any other deletion method apply then check if any alternative to deletion applies. Check the talk page of the article and the page history for previous discussions and recent changes. Conduct a search for references if the deletion is on notability.

Y. We need to do a WP:BEFORE prior AfD besides the above. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

5 How long do PROD, BLPPROD and AFD last prior it is deleted or decline?

Answer: PROD, BLPPROD, and AFD should last atleast a week unless objection for PROD and BLPPROD or speedy keep/delete for AFD. AFD discussions can be relisted allowing it to extend for longer than a week.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

6. When a page has been previously BLPROD and was provide a source; however if you still think that article should be deleted, what can you do?

Answer: Check if the source is reliable, you might be able to reinstate the BLPPROD per Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people#Objecting if objection not viable then AFD is probably the next place to go.

Y. BLPPROD doesn't supersede any of the other deletion policies, therefore the article previously tagged BLPPROD still can be deleted per speedy deletion, PROD or AfD. Also it can be draftified or merged. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

7. When do we decide whether an article should be PROD or WP:BLPROD or WP:AFD?

Answer: BLPPROD has a quite specific criteria, if BLPPROD is not satisfied check for a previous AFD/PROD nomination, if no previous nomination is found and the deletion is likely not to be objected, PROD it. If no other deletion method can be taken, AFD the article.

Y The first thing we do when we review an article is to check if the article content fit CSD criteria especially G11 and G12. Then check for possible options to avoid deletion (such as improvement, draftifying, redirecting or merging) we might consider the deletion. If we think the deletion is uncontroversial, but the article doesn't qualify for any of the CSD, we can use PROD. PROD can be used only once and should survive 7 days. If the article is contested we can still nominate it per AfD. If the article is a biography of a living person without a single source of any form we may use BLPPROD. If the tag is removed (after having added at least one reliable source) we can still nominate it for PROD or AfD if we believe it doesn't comply with Wikipedia policies. We use AfD if CSD, PROD OR BLPPROD do not apply. The deletion discussion usually lasts for 7 days prior closing. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

8. What are the reason to WP:Merge a page to another page?

Answer: If an article is a stub or otherwise very short and is unlikely to grow anytime soon, but the subject exists based on a RS. When a non A10 eligible article covers what is basically the same thing as another article or contains significant overlap, or if a short article needs another article to understand.

Y. We merge a page to another when article duplicates/having a large portion of the same content of the subject of another page. 2. Very short articles that aren't expected to be expanded or can't be expanded as there's not much information on the subject. 3. If one article requires additional information for better understanding which is already available in another larger article. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

9. List 10 reasons we purpose WP:REDIR.

Answer:

1. Title of a work that is not independently notable
2. Names of people involved in an event that is not independently notable
3. Acronyms
4. Alternative names
5. Plurals of words
6. Alternative/incorrect captialization
7. Alternative/incorrect punctuation
8. Non neutral name
9. Misspellings
10. Names of sections in articles

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

10. When article can be moved to draft space?

Answer: Duplicate of above section

Recent creation, not ready for mainspace, no copyright violation and no evidence of active improvement. Or the creator has a COI.

Y We also move article back to draft space if the article is not notable but have potential to be notable. (Note: Main space articles should be notable as per Wikipedia guidelines) Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

11. Nominate 5 articles for WP:AFD by using WP:Twinkle and provide explanation of your nomination.

Answer 1: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Kill (album) - Fails GNG and NALBUM, all sources in article is either non independent or unreliable, can only find passing mentions with a BEFORE search. PROD removed to redirect and redirect contested, gaining consensus at AFD per 2021 RFC.

Y - result as redirect - see here. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Answer 2: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southwest Kansas Storm - PROD available but asking for consensus to draftify, direct draftification not available per 2022 RFC (that limits the time on draftifications after mainspace creation). Fails GNG/Subject notability guideline, mostly routine coverage found.

N - result as draffy - see here. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Answer 3: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snowball Effect (SpongeBob SquarePants) - Blank and redirect contested, taking to AFD

N - result as redirect - see here. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Answer 4: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shepherd of the Lakes Lutheran School - Blank and redirect contested 3 times before AFD nom

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Answer 5: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive politicians in the United States - Inherently non-neutral and original research

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

12. Participate in 5 WP:AFD where by you are the first voter of the discussion. Please provide you reason either to delete, keep, redirect or merge.

Answer 1: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Montgomery-Swan - BEFORE search returned no reliable sources, fails notability guidelines

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Answer 2: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stowaway (2014 film) - BEFORE search returned no results suggesting notability, invalid prod objection reasoning

Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Answer 3: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DemandTec (2nd nomination) - Almost notable with a NYT and WSJ source, don't think the WSJ source meets sigcov though. First

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Answer 4: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanquever Frett - Fails GNG, nothing in Wikipedia:Notability (sports) apply

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Answer 5: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of swimming pools in Hungary - fails WP:LISTN

Yet to be closed. We wait... Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

13. Nominate 2 articles for WP:PROD and state your reasons.

Answer 1: Special:Diff/1106631947 on The Legend of 5 Mile Cave, fails GNG and NFILM per my BEFORE search

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Answer 2: Special:Diff/1107289537 on Samuel Owokoniran, no reliable sources about the subject found, no sources found in page history

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

14. Nominate 2 article for WP:BLPROD and state your reasons.

Answer 1: Saurabh Jha, no sources, created with wrong title, moved and BLPPROD

Y. You need to provide the hist diff - see here. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Answer 2: Jayvé with Special:Diff/1111251784, no sources BLP

15.Nominate 2 article for WP:NPPDRAFT - R2 and state your reasons.

Answer 1: The Earth Still Moves (Draft:The Earth Still Moves) - would likely not survive AFD, no reliable sources currently in article

Y. Rightfully the question asking for a R2; however, most participants find it difficult to understand R2 and opt for draft. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Answer 2: Albi Mall (Draft:Albi Mall) - editor has a declaired COI per Special:Permalink/1067820697, and would likely not survive AFD

Y. Rightfully the question asking for a R2; however, most participants find it difficult to understand R2 and opt for draft. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

---

Justiyaya See Assignment 5 above. Cassiopeia talk 10:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Sorry this took me like a month, school got in the way. Got one BLPPROD left that seems really rare, I'll try to find one in the next few days Justiyaya 13:16, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya No worry. School is more immportant than this. Happy to know you have been work on this. Ping when you have done. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 23:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Done! Justiyaya 01:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya See comments above. Pls note when PROD or BLP prod and AfD and especially CSD you need to be sure the article will be closed as per your nomination. The same questions will be in your final exams and pls get it right as it will effect your grade. Let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to next assignmet. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: For answer 2 and 3 in the AFD section, I've included draftify/redirect in my nomination statement, the Southwest Kansas Storm case was due to it being created over 90 days ago, therefore uneligable for direct draftification. The Snowball Effect one was due to a potentially controversial redirect, with one revert in the page history. What should I have done instead of putting them on AFD? Justiyaya 00:39, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya AfD Q2 - I dont think you have stated redirect in your nomination. Q3 -you did state redirect - my mistake and re-marked a check. Sometimes a subject of the article has been mentioned /related to another another without we knowing and the AfD could resulted in redirect but if no voters know about the other article and no one mention it then the nominated article could resulted in delete. As you can see Wikipedia at times is imperfect and AfD result might not be as clear cut as per guidelines. Just an example, any rail road station, with just one not independent, reliable source will always be a keep for some historical reasons and I have seen cricket players from Indian with only first name which were difficult to to verify by the source were resulted a keep as voters arguing to death that English Wikipedia was bias and racist... I am a little bit strict in marking in assignment answers, so participant would be more careful when it come to the final exam. When it come to review - We first checkt if the article violate G11, G12, copyvio , any COI/Paid (all paid article must move to draft sapece - frist needs to be reviewed by AfC (article for creation - draft) reviewer/patroller, then it will move to new page and reviewed the second time by NPP / new page reviewer and the article need to marked all the WP:PAID and WP:COI desclaimber in the artilce talk page and creator user page). If the new article meet notability, then we leave the article alone, if not then see PROP/BLPPROP, merge, redirect or AfD is needed. I hope I had answered your questions. Cassiopeia talk 06:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya Let me know if you are ready to move on to the next assignment. Cassiopeia talk 01:30, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Sorry, I've just had a few busy days irl, I've read both messages above and am ready to move on, thanks! Justiyaya 10:08, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Also in the September 27 comment I was talking about Question 11 where I had to nominate 5 articles for afd and not the 5 first votes Justiyaya 10:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

---

Tagging

In this assignment we look at tagging pages for problems. There any many tags available in Wikipedia and we will look at some of them here.

• Please enable Wikipedia:HotCat in your "Wikipedia references" - see How to enable/disable HotCat. The tool lists and proposes existing categories for auto-completion.
• Pls download StubSorter user script. The script is for adding/removing stub tags.
• Pls download Rater user script. The scripts provides a dialog interface to add, remove, or modify WikiProject banners, including class and importance assessment. Accessible from either the page itself or its talk page. after saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes - see instruction at Wikipedia:Bypass your cache.
• Please enable User:Galobtter/Shortdesc helper gadget for editing, adding, and importing short descriptions.

Tagging in the article

Please read WP:TAGGING and answer the questions below. Please provide explanation in your own words and provide hist diff when applicable.

1. Why do we place tags on the article?

Answer: We add tags when there are issues to an article. We place tags so that we can notify readers of issues and to ask other editors to fix the issues (especially when we are not confident with fixing it ourselves).

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

2. What does "drive by tagging" mean?

Answer: When tags are added but the problem is not obvious and is not adequately explained using a talk page section or using an edit summary.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

3. List down 8 common tagging should be avoided in an article?

Answer:

1. Tagging to make a point
2. Using excessive tags
3. Using tags that serve the same purpose
4. Using the wrong tags
5. Using vague tags when more specific ones can be used
6. Tagging when the problem is not obvious and not explained
7. Tagging for really minor problems that can be easily fixed
8. Tagging an article when it can be easily fixed by the person tagging

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

4. When it is appropriate to remove the tags?

Answer: Any editor without a conflict of interest to the subject can remove a tag from a page if they think that the tag is unnecessary because the issue is either resolved, or didn't exist in the first place. An edit summary or talk page message can be helpful for communication when un-tagging.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

5. Tag 10 articles from Special:Newpagesfeed where appropriate tags are needed and provide associate personal message to creator using page curator tool.

(pls provide links)

i. Answer:

tag message

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

ii. Answer:

tagmessage

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

iii. Answer:

tag (now redirect)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

iv. Answer:

Special:Diff/1131252069

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

v. Answer:

Special:Diff/1123952032 message

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

vi. Answer:

Special:Diff/1127539662 (translate)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

vii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1127684398

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

viii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1122557735

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

ix. Answer:

Special:Diff/1121475348

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

x. Answer:

Special:Diff/1121074340

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

6. Read Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types and use StubSorter user script. Tag 10 sub class article correctly from Special:Newpagesfeed. (pls provide links)

i. Answer:

Special:Diff/1114572634

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

ii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1114975707

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

iii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1115447097

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

iv. Answer:

Special:Diff/1116154602

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

v. Answer:

Special:Diff/1127539495

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

vi. Answer:

Special:Diff/1133951634

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

vii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1134158099

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

viii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1134309199

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

ix. Answer:

Special:Diff/1134312048

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

x. Answer:

Special:Diff/1134686012

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Categorization

7. Please read Wikipedia:Categorization and assign 10 articles from Special:Newpagesfeed with one or more useful categories. You can check similar articles for potentially relevant categories. (pls provide links)

i. Answer:

Special:Diff/1114977787 and Special:Diff/1114977650

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

ii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1115446975 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

iii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1116156035 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

iv. Answer:

Special:Diff/1134685511 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

v. Answer:

Special:Diff/1134311195 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

vi. Answer:

Special:Diff/1135090505 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

vii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1135092281 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

viii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1135390123 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

ix. Answer:

Special:Diff/1135390970 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

x. Answer:

Special:Diff/1135391085 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Sorting

8. Please read Wikipedia:WikiProject and Wikipedia:Content assessment and tag 10 articles from Special:Newpagesfeed with appropriate WikiProject and class types on the articles' talk pages. Please use Rater user script. (pls provide links)

i. Answer:

Special:Permalink/1114572761 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

ii. Answer:

Special:Permalink/1114974975 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

iii. Answer:

Special:Permalink/1115447158 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

iv. Answer:

Special:Permalink/1116156614 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

v. Answer:

Special:Permalink/1116154684 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

vi. Answer:

Special:Permalink/1133501986 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

vii. Answer:

Special:Permalink/1133951563 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

viii. Answer:

Special:Permalink/1134158268 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

ix. Answer:

Special:Permalink/1134159024 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

x. Answer:

Special:Permalink/1134309139 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Short description

9. short description suitable to allow a reader to identify which search result is most likely to suit their needs. All mainspace pages should have a description of what they are preferably limit to about 40 characters, but function is important. Please read Wikipedia:Short description and Wikipedia:WikiProject Short descriptions and provide 10 short descriptions in 10 different articles from Special:Newpagesfeed. Please enable User:Galobtter/Shortdesc helper prior making the edit. (pls provide links)

i. Answer:

Special:Diff/1115447052 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

ii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1134308650 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

iii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1134308980

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

iv. Answer:

Special:Diff/1134267290

Y. I think https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Override_clause_%28Israel%29&diff=next&oldid=1134267290&diffmode=source this] link you were intended to provide. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

v. Answer:

Special:Diff/1134311808 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

vi. Answer:

Special:Diff/1134685631 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

vii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1134687464 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

viii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1135090660 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

ix. Answer:

Special:Diff/1135091970 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

x. Answer:

Special:Diff/1135389602 Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

---

Justiyaya See assignment 6 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 10:28, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: in question 5 of the tagging section, you mentioned the page curator tool, I believe the tool is only enabled for users with the new page reviewer usergroup. Can I leave personalized messages without the tool instead? Justiyaya 05:17, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Justiyaya Yes, you are right and you dont need to answer the questions. Cassiopeia talk 08:41, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: I'm finally done... sorry it took me so long, irl stuff got in the way Justiyaya 11:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Cassiopeia, it's been a while, busy IRL? Justiyaya 05:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Justiyaya Sorry, I think I missed your previous message. Will review it tmrw. Thanks for letting me know. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Justiyaya Reviewed. See above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

---

Communication and editor interactions

Wikipedia project is a collaboration of many editors, some are experienced and some are new to the Project ad Wikipedia values all constructive editors' contributions alike. Communication in a civil, respectful manner is a vital part in Wikipedia, and it should be welcomed rather than discouraged especially to new editors who are not familiar with Wikipedia guidelines and policies for most new editors find it is a steep learning curve during the first few months of editing articles or creating articles in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia:Assume good faith, WP:BITE, WP:CIVIL, Wikipedia:Etiquette, and welcome template and answer the following questions. Do provide links and hist diff where appropriate.

Communication

1. How do we deal with a bad faith registered user and how do we deal with a bad faith IP editor?

Answer:

For both of them, the first step would be to revert their problematic edits, tag their problematic pages for deletion (depends on type) and WP:Warn them on the respective policies. If they persist, they can be reported on WP:AIV or similar noticeboards Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

2. What can we do to welcome and help the newcomers.? (List down 10 different ways/scenario)

i. Answer:

Leaving them welcome templates with useful links Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

ii. Answer:

Giving them helpful tips when they are stuck Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

iii. Answer:

Answering questions with the mentorship module or the Teahouse Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

iv. Answer:

Assuming good faith when a user names a mistake Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

v. Answer:

leaving them personalized messages when they make a mistake in good faith (templates could also work but a typed message feels better sometimes) Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

vi. Answer:

Giving them tons of WP:Wikilove Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

vii. Answer:

Making the Teahouse and other methods of getting help (help me template, irc, discord) known Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

viii. Answer:

Don't tag newcomer's pages with a lot of templates, or when tagging leave a decently kind note Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

ix. Answer:

Consider alternatives to deletion such as improvement especially when dealing with pages by newcomers Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

x. Answer:

Being more tonally friendly when leaving messages Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

3. In you own words, provide 10 ways to avoid biting the newcomers.

i. Answer:

Avoid using too much of the language specific to Wikipedia that they might have not yet gotten familiar with Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

ii. Answer:

Avoid assuming bad faith, especially to new users Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

iii. Answer:

Read and understand requests fully before trying to respond to them Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

iv. Answer:

Avoid templates when users are acting in good faith Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

v. Answer:

Avoid tonally negative words Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

vi. Answer:

Avoid excessive critique Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

vii. Answer:

Avoid deletion and always consider other alternatives Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

viii. Answer:

Avoid sarcasm Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

ix. Answer:

Giving out Wikilove Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

x. Answer:

Stepping away to avoid acting on emotions Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

4. Place 5 different welcome templates on 5 different newcomers. (Pls provide user talk page links)

i. Answer:

Special:Diff/1140053683

ii. Answer:

Special:Diff/1140054563

iii. Answer:

Special:Permalink/1140054592

iv. Answer:

Special:Permalink/1140054975

v. Answer:

Special:Diff/1140055586

5. List 5 uncivil behaviors and explain how you would duel with them.

i. Answer:

Personal attacks - At first, notify the user of the policy with a warning depending on the situation, reporting them if the problem persists or directly depending on the situation. Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

ii. Answer:

Legal threats - Mostly the same with personal attacks, first with a warning then reporting or directly depending on the situation Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

iii. Answer:

Biting newcomers - With a written note if it is an issue Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

iv. Answer:

Doxxing - IRC or Email for oversight and then perhaps trip to some noticeboard like ANI Justiyaya 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

v. Answer:

(General) Rudeness - Quite similar to the first two, reminding the user that it's wrong and reporting them if necessary Justiyaya 06:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

A token of appreciation

We reward Wikipedia editors for their hard work and due diligence by awarding them barnstars as a token of appreciation, encouragement and make its recipient feel good of their contributions. The choice of banstar given should be fair and appropriate, which will help prevent over-use. There are many different type of banstars, kindly read Wikipedia:Barnstars, Wikipedia:Personal user awards

5. Give 5 different banstars to 5 different editor and do provide relevant text as to why you are awarding them. (Pls provide links)

i. Answer:

ii. Answer:

iii. Answer:

iv. Answer:

v. Answer:

---

Justiyaya See assignment 7 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 08:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll try to do a lot faster than before Justiyaya 12:36, 7 February 2023 (UTC)