Jump to content

User:Jéské Couriano/ArbCaseSum/06/Jan-Mar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How to read the sections

[edit]
  • Decided: The calendar date (in UTC) when the case was decided. If the case did not reach a decision, it will be Closed instead. If the case involved an administrator "retiring", it will be "Deopped" instead.
  • Abbrev.: A shorthand abbreviation of the casename. See ArbCaseAbv for more details.
  • Type: The type of case it is:
  • Admin: A case centred around the conduct of one or more administrators.
  • Dispute: A case that examines an intractible dispute between two or more editors directly.
  • Editor: A case about the (non-administrative) misconduct of an editor.
  • Functionary: A case centred around misuse of Suppressor or Checkuser permissions.
  • Omnibus: A case about misconduct in a topic area writ large.
  • Other: Any case that doesn't fall into one of the categories above.
  • Scope: The overall scope of the case.
  • CT?: An indication of whether or not a case includes or included a discretionary sanctions or contentious topic remedy.
  • Remedy name: The name of the remedy (or a description of it, for earlier cases which did not have sectioned remedies).
  • Remedy (in modern terms): Basically my best attempt to explain, in plain English and modern understanding, what the remedy means.
  • If this section has a coloured background, the colour indicates its status or origin:
  • Yellow (#FFFF00) is a temporary injunction issued mid-case.
  • Blue (#00BFFF) is a post-close amendment or motion.
  • Red (#CD5C5C) is a remedy that has since been rescinded or otherwise is wholly reliant on previous remedies that are themselves rescinded.
  • Green (#32CD32) is a remedy whose wording was amended post-close, either due to an amendment/motion or due to changes in process (such as Discretionary Sanctions to Contentious Topic).
  • Brown (#D2691E) is suspended or in abeyence, usually as part of a period where a remedy has been appealed.
  • Amended/Enacted: If a remedy was added or amended post-close, this will be the calendar date (in UTC) when the remedy was modified or took effect.
  • Rescinded: If a remedy was terminated, this will be the calendar date (in UTC) when the remedy was ended.
  • Enforceable?: Indicates whether a given remedy can be invoked at WP:AE. Any remedy that predates April 2006 and was not still in force by then predates AE entirely.
  • Sup/Opp/Abs/Rcs: The vote totals for a remedy (Support, Oppose, Abstain, Recused).

Any case that has been courtesy-blanked or closed without action will be given a very brief description and nothing further.

  • Decided: Jan. 25, 2006
  • Abbrev.: WCX
  • Type: Dispute
  • Scope: Addressing a culture of bad faith and unneccessary deletionism in the webcomics topic area
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Aaron Brenneman admonished Aaron Brenneman is admonished to be respectful of consensus in creating and altering Wikipedia policy.[...] Predates AE 7 0 0 1
All parties cautioned to remain civil Every named party to the case is cautioned to remain civil even in stressful situations. Predates AE 7 0 0 1
  • Decided: Jan. 27, 2006
  • Abbrev.: AdK
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: AndriyK's disruptive page moves in the Ukraine topic area
  • CT?: No[i]
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Restrictions on AndriyK's editing Until such time as a consensus has been reached as to a naming convention for Ukrainian geographical locations, AndriyK is topic-banned from edits about, and page moves involving, that topic area. Note that a large chunk of the problem that led to this case was AndriyK moving pages and then editing the redirect left behind to prevent non-admins from reversing his moves. Yes 7 0 0 0
AndriyK banned AndriyK is sitebanned 1mo. Predates AE 7 0 0 0
Andrew Alexander, AndriyK, and MaryMaidan warned about copyright violations AndriyK, Andrew Alexander, and MaryMaidan are warned not to plagiarise content from elsewhere or interfere in the removal of copyright violations. Predates AE 7 0 0 0
Ghirlandajo warned Ghirlandajo is warned to avoid incivility or personal attacks. Predates AE 7 0 0 0
Reversal of irreversible page moves Administrators working at WP:Requested moves may summarily undo irreversible page moves as if they were technical move requests without any further discussion. N/A 7 0 0 0
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Gibraltarian placed on personal attack parole Assuming he's ever unblocked/unbanned, Gibraltarian may from then on be summarily blocked for up to 1w if he makes an edit judged to be a personal attack. Yes 7 0 0 0
Gibraltarian placed on probation " " " "/", for the first year afterwards Gibraltarian may be summarily topic-banned from any article in what would become the GBT topic area at administrator discretion. This remedy may be reset or extended if there is a consensus to do so amongst at least three uninvolved administrators. Yes 7 0 0 0
Gibraltarian placed on general Probation " " " ", Gibraltarian may be summarily banned from Wikipedia for up to 1yr or restricted/banned from any non-Gibraltar page he disrupts by consensus of at least three uninvolved administrators. Each ban issued this way is to be logged on the case page. (Gibraltarian was indefinitely sitebanned via this remedy May 04, 2007.) Yes 7 0 0 0
No action on indefinite block As Gibraltarian was indefinitely blocked during and independent of the case, the remedies above will take effect only if he is unblocked. Any unblock is conditional on him accepting those sanctions. N/A 7 0 0 0
Sockpuppets and reverts Any unregistered or newly-registered user that behaves in the same manner as Gibraltarian will share his sanctions. N/A 8 1 0 0
  • Decided: Jan. 31, 2006
  • Abbrev.: RB1
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: Robert I's conduct with regards to Gregory Lauder-Frost
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Robert I banned pending resolution of legal issues Owing to an orgy of on-wiki evidence that Robert I is British right-wing figure Gregory Lauder-Frost (or at the very least is working directly under him) and has threatened legal action, he is sitebanned as long as legal action remains outstanding and/or he keeps issuing legal threats. (The diffs used to support this in the relevant finding of fact are deleted.) Yes 6 0 0 0
Robert I to use one account Assuming his ban is ever lifted, Robert I must use the Robert I account and no other. Yes 6 0 0 0
Robert I banned for one year from editing articles relating to Gregory Lauder-Frost " " " " " ", for the first year after Robert I is topic-banned from the Gregory Lauder-Frost topic area. Yes 6 0 0 0
Robert I placed on probation " " " " " ", Robert I may be summarily topic-banned from any article he disrupts at administrator discretion. All such bans are to be logged on the case page. Yes 6 0 0 0
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Temporary Injunction Copperchair is sitebanned save for his userspace and this Arbitration as long as it is active. Predates AE 7 0 0 0
Copperchair banned from Star Wars Copperchair is indefinitely topic-banned from the Star Wars topic area. Yes 8 0 0 0
Copperchair banned from War on Terrorism " " " "-" " " War on terror topic area. Yes 6 1 1 0
Copperchair placed on probation Copperchair may be summarily topic-banned from any article he disrupts at administrator discretion, and may be given a wider topic-ban or a siteban by consensus of at least three uninvolved administrators. All bans issued under this remedy are to be logged on the case page. Yes 8 0 0 0
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Domninion of Melchizedek semi-protected Articles in the Dominion of Melchizedek topic-area are to be semi-protected, though admins are free to adjust the protection levels at their discretion. Johnski (who had been indefinitely blocked in the week before the case closed for constant edit-warring in the topic area) and sockpuppets of same (apparent or otherwise) are to be blocked on discovery. Yes 7 0 0 0
  • Decided: Feb. 03, 2006
  • Abbrev.: WSI
  • Type: Dispute
  • Scope: Persistent edit-warring (and resultant full-protection) of Winter Soldier Investigation
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
TDC: Banned from Winter Soldier Investigation TDC is topic-banned from Winter Soldier Investigation for 1yr. Yes 7 0 0 0
(IPv4 address starting in 165.)[iii]: Banned from Winter Soldier Investigation The person behind the IPv4 address is topic-banned from Winter Soldier Investigation for 1yr. Yes 7 0 0 0
Good behavior Provided they have not breached their topic-bans, TDC and the user behind the IPv4 may appeal them after 3 months. (The remedy is written oddly, due to 1RR being offered up as a remedy against both TDC and the IPv4 and failing in both cases.) N/A 7 0 0 0
  • Decided: Feb. 04, 2006
  • Abbrev.: XD2
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: Xed's conduct since XED
  • CT?: No[iv]
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enacted Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Xed warned regarding personal attacks Xed is reminded that he is still under his personal attack parole from XED. -- Predates AE 8 0 0 0
Xed warned regarding citing unreliable sources Despite the name of the remedy, Xed is warned against citation fraud (i.e. citing a source that doesn't support the claim it's cited for). -- Predates AE 8 0 0 0
Viriditas commended Viriditas is commended for continuing to work with the article substantially improving it while maintaining a courteous attitude towards the difficult user Xed.[links added] -- Predates AE 8 0 0 0
Xed placed on indefinite personal attack parole Xed's recently-lapsed personal attack parole is reinstated indefinitely - Xed may be summarily blocked for up to 1w if he makes an edit judged to be a personal attack. Apr. 22, 2006 Yes 5 0 0 0

(Some remedies here refer to "The problem NLP editors", which refer to users AliceDeGrey, Comaze, DaveRight, HeadleyDown, and JPLogan collectively.)

Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Rescinded Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Probation Any editor disrupting pages in the neuro-linguistic programming topic area may be summarily topic-banned from those pages at administrator discretion. All such bans are to be logged on the case page and the offending user's talk page. (This remedy was rescinded as superseded by PS' DS regime.) Oct. 30, 2015 Yes 9 0 0 0
Adequate sourcing The problem NLP editors are warned to thoroughly cite their sources. -- Predates AE 9 0 0 0
NPOV The problem NLP editors are warned that any claims and quotes must be attributed. -- Predates AE 9 0 0 0
Discuss reverts Barring obvious vandalism, each of the problem NLP editors are required to explain any reverts they perform at neuro-linguistic programming on the article's talk page. Breaches are to be met with blocks, capped at 1w for the first five aqnd 1yr thereafter. -- Yes 7 2 0 0
Mentorship Neuro-linguistic programming is placed under a mentorship of three to five administrators who are authorised to summarily topic-ban users from it or from related pages. Any such bans are to be logged on the case page and the offending user's talk page. (This remedy contains a review and rescission clause that, based on when it was finally rescinded, had been forgotten about.) Feb. 03, 2022 No 8 1 0 0
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Benjamin Gatti placed on probation For the next year, Benjamin Gatti may be summarily topic-banned from any page he disrupts at administrator discretion. All such bans are to be logged on the case page. This probation may explicitly be extended as per the remedy below. Yes 7 0 0 0
Benjamin Gatti placed on general probation Benjamin Gatti may be summarily sitebanned for 1yr, may have his probation above extended 1yr, or be restricted/banned from any page he disrupts by a consensus of at least three administrators. Each ban and probation extension issued this way must be logged on the case page. Yes 7 0 0 0
  • Decided: Feb. 06, 2006
  • Abbrev.: DCV
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: Deeceevoice's uncommunicativeness and combativeness
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Non-escalating personal attack parole Deeceevoice may be summarily blocked for up to 1w if she makes an edit judged to be a personal attack. Yes 7 1 0 0
Reminder regarding core Wikipedia policies Deeceevoice is warned to adhere to Wikipedia's central content/sourcing policies and guidelines. Predates AE 8 0 0 0
Counseling regarding offense Deeceevoice is warned to assume good faith towards those opposing her arguments. Predates AE 8 0 0 0
Offensive user page prohibition Deeceevoice is banned from using subpages in her userspace to host offensive essays, polemics, and screeds. Breaches are to be met with the summary deletion of the page and (if she attempts to restore pages deleted this way) a block, capped at 1w for the first five and 1yr thereafter. Yes 7 1 0 0
Friday cautioned Friday is cautioned to avoid suggesting to users who are the subject of Arbitration proceedings that they abandon Wikipedia. (Friday was one of two users who were deemed to be harassing Deeceevoice, but compared to Jim Apple their transgressions are incredibly tame.) Predates AE 5 2 0 0
Jim Apple cautioned Jim Apple is cautioned to avoid suggesting to users who are the subject of Arbitration proceedings that they abandon Wikipedia. In other words, ArbCom is failing to treat proven extensive harassment with the gravitas it deserves. Predates AE 6 1 0 0
Deeceevoice placed on probation Deeceevoice may be summarily topic-banned from any page she disrupts at administrator discretion, and may be sitebanned for up to 1yr by consensus of at least three administrators. Any such sanctions issued this way are to be logged. Yes 8 0 0 0

Beckjord

[edit]
  • Decided: Feb. 07, 2006
  • Abbrev.: BJ

(This case has been courtesy-blanked for the privacy of its participants and their estates. All remedies still in force were terminated June 22, 2008 after Beckjord passed away. This case has Enforcement threads.)

  • Decided: Feb. 07, 2006
  • Abbrev.: FK
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: EffK's POV-pushing in re Catholic Church
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
EffK banned from Catholicism articles EffK is indefinitely topic-banned from all articles in the Catholicism topic area. Breaches are to be met with blocks, capped at 1w for the first five and 1yr thereafter. Yes 8 0 0 0
EffK banned EffK is sitebanned 1yr. Yes 8 0 0 0
EffK to be banned from articles that he disrupts EffK may be summarily topic-banned from editing any page he disrupts for up to 3mo at administrator discretion. Breaches of such topic-bans are to be met with blocks, capped at 1w for the first five and 1yr thereafter. Yes 8 0 0 0

(This case was forcibly opened via deus ex Jimbo due to the situation, and lasted only 112h from start to finish. Several administrators had been wheel-warring over two paedophilia userboxes (one of which was earnest and the other more inflammatory), prompting Jimbo to emergency-desysop all of them after his attempts to block the lot of them were themselves wheel-warred by Karmafist.)

  • Decided: Feb. 10, 2006
  • Abbrev.: UWW
  • Type: Admin
  • Scope: Wheel-warring over a succession of pro-paedophilia userboxes
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Temporary injunction Dschor is sitebanned save for his userspace and this Arbitration as long as it is active. Predates AE 6 0 0 0
El C El C's emergency desysop is reversed and his administrative rights are restored. ArbCom specifically noted his overall role in the situation was minor, and he had been unjustifiably blocked by Carnildo. N/A 10 2 0 0
BorgHunter BorgHunter's emergency desysop is kept for two more days, after which his administrator rights will be restored. ArbCom noted his role in the case amounted to antagonising David Gerard, for which he would issue a mea culpa. N/A 12 0 0 0
Paroxysm Paroxysm is sitebanned 72h for re-creating the original, earnest paedophilia userbox after it had been deleted by David Gerard. Predates AE 12 0 0 0
Carnildo For his incredibly poor judgment in summarily blocking three established users on a sketchy-at-best "hate speech" claim, Carnildo's emergency desysop is made permanent. They may only regain the tools through a new, successful request for adminship, and may not file one for two weeks after the case's close. N/A 11 1 0 0
Ashibaka Ashibaka's emergency desysop is kept for two more weeks, after which his administrator rights will be restored. ArbCom noted that Ashibaka restored the two userbox templates a total of five times between the two. N/A 13 0 0 0
Dschor Dschor is sitebanned 2mo for intentionally creating a more inflammatory version of the original paedophilia userbox. Afterwards, he may be summarily topic-banned from any page he disrupts or summarily blocked for said disruption at administrator discretion. Provided he has not breached it, Dschor may appeal this probation after 2mo. Yes 11 0 0 0
Karmafist For wheel-warring against Jimbo Wales, Karmafist's emergency desysop is made permanent. They may only regain the tools through a new, successful request for adminship, and may not file one for two weeks after the case's close. N/A 10 0 1 0
Dschor and Paroxysm enjoined from userboxes Dschor and Paroxysm are both indefinitely topic-banned from creating or modifying userboxes. They may still put pre-made userboxen onto their userpages as long as they don't modify them. Yes 12 0 0 0
Reprimands Carbonite, El C, and BorgHunter are reprimanded for inappropriate use of their administrator tools, and are instructed to exercise more caution in using them in the future. Predates AE 10 0 0 0
SPUI SPUI is sitebanned 10d for creating yet another paedophilia-related userbox. Afterwards, he may be summarily topic-banned from any page he disrupts or summarily blocked for said disruption at administrator discretion. Provided he has not breached it, SPUI may appeal this probation after 2mo. Yes 11 0 0 0

(Reddi 1 does not exist as a case; it's a draft Arbitration request that was never formally filed.)

  • Decided: Feb. 11, 2006
  • Abbrev.: RDI
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: Reddi's edit-warring on cosmology articles
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Reddi placed on revert parole For the next year, Reddi is on 1RR/week and is required to explain all reverts he makes (excepting obvious vandalism) on the talk page of the affected article. Yes 6 0 0 0
Reddi placed on probation For the next year, Reddi may be summarily topic-banned from any article he disrupts at administrator discretion. Any such bans must be logged on the case page, the affected article's talk page, and Reddi's talk page. Yes 6 0 0 0
Extensions of parole or probation Either or both remedies above may be extended on a year-by-year basis by consensus of three uninvolved administrators. No 8 0 0 0
  • Decided: Feb. 12, 2006
  • Abbrev.: FSF
  • Type: Admin
  • Scope: Freestylefrappe's misuse of administrator tools
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enacted Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Freestylefrappe desysopped with immediate reentitlement Freestylefrappe's administrator rights are revoked. He may only regain them through a new successful request for adminship. -- N/A 8 0 0 0
Freestylefrappe restricted to one account Freestylefrappe must pick one account he controls. Once he does, he can edit from that account and no other. Sep. 10, 2006 Yes 6 0 0 0
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enacted Rescinded Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Carl Hewitt banned from autobiographical editing Carl Hewitt is indefinitely topic-banned from the Carl Hewitt topic area. -- -- Yes 7 0 0 0
Carl Hewitt placed on probation Carl Hewitt may be summarily topic-banned from any article outside of the Carl Hewitt topic area he disrupts at administrator discretion. -- Apr. 19, 2016 Yes 7 0 0 0
Post-case clarification This amendment sets the scope of the Carl Hewitt topic area (Carl Hewitt, his students, any research area they are active in, theoretical computer science, logic programming, and Actor model and related articles), affirms that Carl Hewitt's topic-ban is indefinite, and explicitly allows for the use of page-level sanctions to enforce the topic-ban to limit collateral damage. Oct. 16, 2007 -- Yes (in re page-level sanctions) 6 0 0 0
  • Decided: Feb. 17, 2006
  • Abbrev.: RJT
  • Type: Dispute
  • Scope: Factionalism on the Rajput article
  • CT?: No[v]
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enacted Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Shivraj Singh banned from Rajput Shivraj Singh is indefinitely topic-banned from the Rajput topic area. -- Yes 8 0 0 0
DPSingh banned from Rajput DPSingh " " "-" " " " " ". -- Yes 8 0 0 0
Gurkhaboy banned from Rajput Gurkhaboy " " "-" " " " " ". -- Yes 8 0 0 0
"Hindus only side" users banned from Rajput All users listed as the "Hindus only side" at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rajput/Evidence#involved_users are banned from editing Rajput and related articles.[link in original] (Discounting the already-sanctioned Shivraj Singh and DPSingh, this remedy affects Indologist, Kinsman of the Sun[vi], shonan, Sisodia, Son of Kurus, Ss india, Suryabandhu[vi], and a small handful of IPv4 addresses.) -- Yes 8 0 0 0
NPOV reminder All editors involved who have not otherwise been sanctioned are warned to adhere to Wikipedia policy, particularly neutrality. -- Predates AE 8 0 0 0
DPSingh banned DPSingh is sitebanned 1yr. Apr. 25, 2006 Yes 6 0 0 0
  • Decided: Feb. 18, 2006
  • Abbrev.: KDR
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: KDRGibby's aggressiveness
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
KDRGibby placed on personal attack parole KDRGibby may be summarily blocked if he makes an edit judged to be a personal attack or if he uses his userspace to host personal attacks. Blocks are capped at 1w for the first five and 1yr thereafter. Yes 8 0 1 0
KDRGibby placed on probation KDRGibby may be summarily topic-banned from any page or topic-area he disrupts at administrator discretion. All such bans must be logged on the case page and his userpage. Yes 10 0 0 0
KDRGibby placed on general probation KDRGibby may be sitebanned for up to 1yr by consensus of at least three administrators. Any such bans must be logged on the case page. Yes 9 0 0 0
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
RJII placed on personal attack parole RJII may be summarily blocked for up to a week if he makes an edit judged to be a personal attack. Yes 6 0 0 0
RJII cautioned regarding POV editing RJII is warned not to use Wikipedia to push original research or a POV. Predates AE 6 0 0 0
RJII placed on probation RJII may be summarily topic-banned for up to a year from any article he disrupts at administrator discretion. Any such bans are to be logged on the case page. Yes 6 0 0 0
RJII placed on general probation RJII may be sitebanned for up to 1 year by consensus of at least three administrators. All such bans must be logged on the case page. Yes 6 0 0 0
Firebug Firebug is reminded that Arbitration is the final step in dispute resolution, not the first, and that perfectionism makes an enemy of the good. Firebug quit Wikipedia mid-case, precluding hard sanctions. predates AE 6 0 0 0
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Temporary injunction Theodore7 is sitebanned save for his userspace and this Arbitration as long as it is active. Predates AE 5 0 0 0
Six-month ban from editing content on astrology, astronomy, and related subjects For the next six months, Theodore7 is topic-banned from the astrology and astronomy topic areas. Breaches are to be met with blocks, the first capped at 1w and all subsequent ones having no limit. Provided it has not lapsed and he has not breached it, he may appeal this sanction every two months. Yes 9 0 0 0
One-year personal attack parole For the next year, Theodore7 may be summarily blocked if he makes an edit judged to be a personal attack, with the same caps as above. Yes 9 0 0 0
Required edit summaries For the next six months, Theodore7 is required to leave a descriptive and accurate edit summary whenever he makes an edit. Breaches are to be met with blocks, with the same caps as above. Yes 10 0 0 0
  • Decided: Feb. 25, 2006
  • Abbrev.: STN
  • Type: Dispute
  • Scope: Sortan and Jguk's interactions
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Jguk banned from editing with respect to era notation Jguk's existing ban from era notations is expanded to a blanket topic-ban on the era notation topic area. Yes 7 0 0 0
Sortan warned regarding stalking Sortan is warned regarding stalking Jguk. He is welcome to make independent edits, but not follow Jguk around. (The softball remedy is because Sortan up and quit the project in responce to this case being accepted; he has not returned since to my knowledge.) Predates AE 6 1 0 0
  • Decided: Feb. 26, 2006
  • Abbrev.: TST
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: Tommstein's overall conduct
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Temporary injunction Tommstein is sitebanned save for his userspace and this Arbitration as long as it is active. Predates AE 6 0 0 0
Tommstein banned by the community The Arbitration Committee acknowledges and endorses the community's banning of [Tommstein]. Tommstein would be community-banned during the case after the evidence showed a long-term pattern of harassment and aggression from him. No 6 0 0 0
Central placed on personal attack parole For the next year, Central may be summarily blocked if he makes an edit judged to be a personal attack. Blocks are capped at 1w for the first five and 1yr thereafter. Yes 8 0 0 0
Central placed on Probation For the next year, Central may be summarily topic-banned from any page he disrupts at administrator discretion. Any such bans are to be logged on the case page and his talk page. Yes 8 0 0 0
Duffer1 warned regarding incivility and edit-warring Duffer1 is warned not to edit-war or levy personal attacks. Predates AE 8 0 0 0
  • Decided: Feb. 27, 2006
  • Abbrev.: WMZ
  • Type: Dispute
  • Scope: Dispute over sexual abuse controversies about Min Zhu, his daughter, and his company WebEx
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Larvatus banned Larvatus is indefinitely topic-banned from articles in the WebEx and Min Zhu (entrepreneur) topic areas. (Two versions of this ban passed; the other one was limited to editing about the controversy involving Min Zhu and his daughter.) Yes 7 0 0 0
Larvatus placed on probation Larvatus may be summarily topic-banned from any article he disrupts at administrator discretion. Any such bans must be logged on the case page. Yes 7 0 0 0
FeloniousMonk admonished FeloniousMonk is warned against using his administrative tools in a dispute he's involved in. Predates AE 6 1 0 0
FCYTravis admonished FCYTravis is warned against misusing rollback in a content dispute. (At this point in time, rollback was exclusive to the administrator toolset, so this amounted to misuse of administrative tools.) Predates AE 6 1 0 0
Henryuzi banned Henryuzi is indefinitely topic-banned from articles in the WebEx and Min Zhu (entrepreneur) topic areas. Yes 7 0 0 0
Henryuzi placed on probation Henryuzi may be summarily topic-banned from any article he disrupts at administrator discretion. Any such bans must be logged on the case page. Yes 7 0 0 0
Sockpuppets and meatpuppets The remedies applied to Henryuzi shall be applied to any additional sockpuppets or meatpuppets which surface. (A finding of fact strongly implies the Arbitrators deduced that Henryuzi was a sockpuppet of Larvatus, thus this remedy exists to prevent him from evading sanctions on a different account.) N/A 7 0 0 0

(The Ruy Lopez case was merged into this one as the issues at play in both cases were identical and the underlying situations were similar.)

  • Decided: Mar. 02, 2006
  • Abbrev.: AVV
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: Ruy Lopez' sockpuppetry, which was noted/implicated while VeryVerily was filing an appeal
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Remedies vacated VeryVerily's 1RR from GKSV is rescinded. The revert-justification requirement remains in place. (All other remedies on VeryVerily from GKSV had since lapsed on their own terms.) N/A 7 0 0 0
Ruy Lopez sockpuppetry Suspected sockpuppets of Ruy Lopez may be summarily blocked indefinitely. Confirmed sockpuppets of Ruy Lopez may be summarily blocked indefinitely, and Ruy Lopez sitebanned 2mo for each one. Nyess (apparent socks only) 7 0 0 0
Ruy Lopez placed on Probation Ruy Lopez may be summarily topic-banned from any article he disrupts or attempts to push a POV on at administrator discretion. Yes 7 0 0 0
VeryVerily appeal option Provided he hasn't breached it, VeryVerily may appeal the revert-justification requirement via WP:ARCA in 4 months. No 6 1 0 0
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Temporary injunction Zeq and Ian Pitchford are each topic-banned from Palestinian exodus[viii] and 1948 Arab-Israeli War as long as this Arbitration is active. Predates AE 6 0 0 0
Zeq banned from articles he has disrupted and placed on Probation The temporary injunction is retained indefinitely with respect to Zeq. In addition, he may be summarily topic-banned from any article he disrupts at administrator discretion. Any such bans must be logged on the case page. Yes 10 0 0 0
Zeq and Heptor cautioned regarding sources Zeq and Heptor are warned not to use obvious propaganda as a source for claims. Predates AE 10 0 0 0
Zeq cautioned regarding removal of well sourced information Zeq is warned not to blindly revert/remove well-sourced material just because he does not agree with it. Predates AE 10 0 0 0
Others cautioned Everyone else not named in the remedies above is warned to follow standard dispute resolution practices. Predates AE 10 0 0 0
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
T-man, the Wise Scarecrow banned for six months Assuming his mentorship fails, T-man will be sitebanned 6mo from that point. Yes 8 0 0 0
T-man... placed on personal attack parole For the next year, T-man may be summarily blocked if he makes an edit judged to be a personal attack. Blocks are capped at 1w for the first five and 1yr thereafter. Yes 10 0 0 0
Dyslexic Agnostic placed on personal attack parole " " " ", Dyslexic agnostic " " " " " " " " " " " " " " ". " " " " " " " " " " " " " ". Yes 10 0 0 0
T-man... placed on Probation For the next year, T-man may be summarily topic-banned from any page he disrupts at administrator discretion. All such bans are to be logged on the case page. Yes 10 0 0 0
Dyslexic Agnostic placed on Probation " " " ", Dyslexic agnostic " " " "-" " " " " " " " ". " " " " " " " " " " ". Yes 10 0 0 0
T-man... placed under Mentorship T-man is placed under the mentorship of a few administrators in good standing for one year. These mentors are primarily responsible for enforcing T-man's other sanctions and guiding him to become a better editor. As long as the mentorship is ongoing, T-man's siteban is held in abeyence. (The mentorship was deemed to have failed July 31, 2006.) No 9 0 0 0
  • Decided: Mar. 07, 2006
  • Abbrev.: LYS
  • Type: Dispute
  • Scope: Flame war between Danteferno and Leyasu
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Revert parole...on Leyasu For the next year, Leyasu is under 1RR and required to clearly label their reverts as such. Breaches are to be met with blocks, capped at 1w for the first 5 and 1yr thereafter. Yes 8 0 0 0
Revert parole...on Danteferno " " " ", Danteferno " " " " " " " " " " " ". " " " " " " ", " " " " " " " " " " " ". Yes 8 0 0 0
Leyasu placed on personal attack parole For the next year, Leyasu may be summarily blocked if he makes an edit judged to be a personal attack. Blocks are capped as the 1RR's. Yes 8 0 0 0
Leyasu placed on probation Leyasu may be summarily topic-banned from any page he disrupts at administrator discretion. Any such bans must be logged on the case page. Yes 8 0 0 0
Danteferno warned Danteferno is warned not to engage in incivility or personal attacks. Predates AE 8 0 0 0
  • Decided: Mar. 20, 2006
  • Abbrev.: B443
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: Boothy443's edit-warring and personal attacks
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Personal attack parole without a year ban after five blocks Boothy443 may be summarily blocked for up to 1w if he makes an edit judged to be a personal attack. Yes 8 0 0 0
  • Decided: Mar. 20, 2006
  • Abbrev.: IN3
  • Type: Other
  • Scope: Review/re-examination of IN2
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Rescinded Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Restrictions on Instantnood Instantnood's existing ban is given an additional enforcement provision allowing for blocks for up to 1yr and a logging requirement for each block. -- Yes 8 0 0 0
Restrictions on Huaiwei Huaiwei is limited to making one proposed move, straw poll, or policy proposal on how to name articles in the China topic area per week. Anything beyond this is to be met with a block of up to 1yr, and all blocks are to be logged on the case page. (At the time this case was closed, WP:Naming conventions (Chinese) was worded to discourage the use of "China" without qualifiers.) -- Yes 8 0 0 0
Instantnood placed on Probation Instantnood's recently-lapsed probation is reinstated indefinitely. As before, any bans are to be logged on the case page. -- Yes 8 0 0 0
Instantnood placed on general probation Instantnood may be sitebanned for any length of time by consensus of at least three uninvolved administrators. All such bans are to be logged on the case page. -- Yes 8 0 0 0
Huaiwei placed on Probation Huaiwei's recently-lapsed probation is reinstated indefinitely. As before, any bans are to be logged on the case page. Sep. 06, 2007 Yes 8 0 0 0
Huaiwei placed on general probation Huaiwei may be sitebanned for any length of time by consensus of at least three uninvolved administrators. All such bans are to be logged on the case page. Sep. 06, 2007 Yes 8 0 0 0

Jason Gastrich

[edit]
  • Decided: Mar. 21, 2006

(This case has been courtesy-blanked. Jason Gastrich[vi] was temporarily sitebanned and placed under a laundry list of editing restrictions.)

  • Decided: Mar. 21, 2006
  • Abbrev.: KF
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: Karmafist's inappropriate new-user welcomes pointing such users to polemics in his userspace
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Karmafist's welcomes Karmafist is banned from welcoming users with anything other than {{welcome}} and must use a neutrally-worded and civil edit summary when welcoming users. Breaches are to be met with blocks, capped at 1w for the first five and 1yr thereafter. Yes 7 0 0 0
Karmafist placed on civility parole For the next year, Karmafist may be summarily blocked if he makes an edit judged to be incivil or a personal attack. Blocks are capped as above. Yes 7 0 0 0
  • Decided: Mar. 24, 2006
  • Abbrev.: LCR
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: Licorne's POV-pushing
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Licorne banned for a year Licorne is sitebanned 1yr. (This siteban would become an indefinite community ban the day after the case was decided, as Licorne's responce to the siteban was particularly extreme antisemitic remarks on multiple editors.) Yes 7 0 0 0
Probation Assuming his community ban is ever lifted, Licorne may be summarily topic-banned from any page he disrupts at administrator discretion. Any such ban must be logged on the case page. Yes 7 0 0 0
Personal attack parole " " " " " " ", Licorne may be summarily blocked if he makes an edit judged to be a personal attack. Blocks are capped at 1w for the first five and 1yr thereafter. Yes 7 0 0 0
  • Decided: Mar. 25, 2006
  • Abbrev.: SHL
  • Type: Dispute
  • Scope: Intractible edit-warring over Shiloh Shepherd Dog
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Rescinded Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Temporary injunction Tina M. Barber and ShenandoahShilohs are topic-banned from Shiloh Shepherd Dog[ix] as long as this Arbitration is active. -- Predates AE 5 0 0 0
Tina M. Barber banned Tina M. Barber is sitebanned 1yr in part for doxxing her ideological opponents. -- Yes 7 0 0 0
Article-related Probation Any editor who disrupts Shiloh Shepherd Dog may be summarily topic-banned from it at administrator discretion. Breaches of a topic-ban issued this way are to be met with blocks, capped at 1w for the first five and 1yr thereafter. Feb. 03, 2022 Yes 7 0 0 0
Meatpuppets banned Any user suspected to be a sock- or meatpuppet that disrupts any discussions or articles about the Shiloh dog breed may be summarily indefinitely blocked. -- Yes 7 0 0 0
Editors warned Every other editor participating in discussions about the dog breed are warned to stay civil during heated discussions. -- Predates AE 7 0 0 0
  • Decided: Mar. 28, 2006
  • Abbrev.: CD4
  • Type: Editor
  • Scope: -Ril-'s conduct since CD3.
  • CT?: No
Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
-Ril- blocked indefinitely -Ril- is a confirmed sockpuppet of CheeseDreams and is therefore indefinitely blocked to enforce her account restriction. N/A 6 0 0 2
CheeseDreams ban extended CheeseDreams' currently-active siteban is reset to Mar. 28, 2007. This would be rendered moot after CheeseDreams intentionally exposed her account password again a month after this case, leading it to be indefinitely blocked as compromised. Yes 6 0 0 2

Tony Sidaway

[edit]
  • Decided: Mar. 30, 2006

(This case has been courtesy-blanked. Tony Sidaway was placed on an admin-tools-only version of 1RR, and another user was both banned from userboxes and placed on probation.)

Remedy name Remedy (in modern terms) Enforceable? Sup Opp Abs Rcs
Gnetwerker cautioned regarding discourtesy Gnetwerker is cautioned regarding discourtesy. Predates AE 7 0 0 1
Gnetwerker cautioned regarding original research Gnetwerker is cautioned to avoid using unpublished material as a source. Predates AE 7 0 0 1
IronDuke cautioned regarding unsourced material IronDuke is warned not to add material to articles that doesn't have adequate sourcing, doubly so if the material is derogatory. Predates AE 7 0 0 1

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ Locus of case falls entirely in the EE area
  2. ^ Locus of case falls entirely in the GBT area
  3. ^ As the unregistered user uses multiple IPs in a range, they are identified with their ISP and the first two octets of their IPv4 addresses in the case proper.
  4. ^ Locus of case is entirely in the PIA area
  5. ^ Locus of the case falls wholly within the South Asian social strata contentious topic.
  6. ^ a b c User has invoked their right to vanish
  7. ^ Locus of the case falls entirely into the PIA area.
  8. ^ An article on a specific Palestinian exodus was not specified, but it can be assumed to be the 1948 one from context
  9. ^ At the time of this Arbitration, the status of the breed was uncertain, with Tina and Shenandoah being two dog breeders who independently claimed to have created the breed.